Skip to main content
Log in

Can a Wealthy Economy Gain from an EU Membership? Adjustment Costs and Long Term Welfare Effects of Full Integration—The Norwegian Case

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We employ a large scale macroeconometric model to study adjustment problems and long term welfare effects of a Norwegian EU-membership. Accession costs depend significantly on the country's level of GDP, the size of its agricultural sector and tariff and VAT revenues as these elements determine the net membership contribution. Without the transfers, integrating the economy into EU generates a small welfare gain. This result is strongly affected by a long period with under-utilisation of resources. With the net contribution included, we identify a welfare loss. This is especially so if fiscal policy is changed to maintain the public sector budgetary balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accession Treaty (1994) “Negotiations on Accession of Austria, Finland, Norway and Sweden to the European Union.” European Commission (Final version).

  • Antille, Gabrielle et al. (1993) “Switzerland and the European Economic Area: A General Equilibrium Assessment of Some Measures of Integration.” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 129(4), 643–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowitz, Einar et al. (1994) Norwegian Membership in the EU-A Macro Economic Study. Reports No. 25/94, Statistics Norway, Oslo. (In Norwegian only).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowitz, Einar and Ådne Cappelen (1994) Price formation and factor demand in Norwegian Industries. Social and Economic Studies 85, Statistics Norway, Oslo. (In Norwegian only).

    Google Scholar 

  • Börve, Knut et al. (1994) Evaluating the Consequences for Norwegian Agricultural Production of an EU Membership, Norsk Institutt for Landbruksøkonomisk Forskning. (In Norwegian only).

  • Cappelen, Ådne (1992) “A Macroeconometric Model of the Norwegian Economy.” In L. Bergman and Ø. Olsen (eds.), Economic Modelling in the Nordic Countries, Contributions to Economic Analysis. North Holland.

  • Cecchini, P., M. Catinat, and A. Jacquemin (1988) The European Challenge 1992-The Benefits of a Single Market. Bruxelles: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiskeb åtredernes Forbund (1994) “Negotiation results with the EU-A Fishing Solution South of the 62° North.” Document, Fiskeb åtredernes Forbund, Norway. (In Norwegian only).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flam, Harry and Håkan Nordstr öm (1995) Why do pre-tax car prices differ so much across European countries? Discussion Paper No. 1181. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fæhn, Taran et al. (1995) The Composition of Effective Assistance to Norwegian Industries in 1989 and1991. Reports No. 9/95, Statistics Norway, Oslo. (In Norwegian only)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland, Jan I. (1992) “Comparative Advantage, Terms of Trade and Welfare Effects of European Integration: Some Preliminary Assessments.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94(3), 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland, Jan I. (1994) “Norway: The Trade Effects of European Integration.” The World Economy 17, 683–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herin, Jan (1986) “Rules of Origin and Differences between Tariff Levels in EFTA and in the EC.” EFTA Occational Papers No. 13.

  • Holmøy, Erling, Gunnar Nordén, and Birger Strøm (1994) MSG-5. A Complete Description of the System of Equations. Reports No. 19/94. Statistics Norway, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuschnigg, Christian and Wilhelm Kohler (1995) “Dynamic Effects of Trade Liberalisation: An Intertemporal CGE Approach.” Review of International Economics 3(1), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, Ari (1994) “Sweden: Effects of EU membership on investment and growth.” The World Economy 17(5), 667–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercenier, Jean and Bernardin Akitoby (1993) On Intertemporal General Equilibrium Reallocation Effects of Europe's Move to a Single Market, Discussion Paper No. 87. Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

  • Mercenier, Jean (1995) “Can “1992” Reduce Unemployment in Europe? On Welfare and Employment Effects of Europe's Move to a Single Market.” Journal of Policy Modeling 17(1), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Marcus H. and John E. Spencer (1977) “The Static Economic Effects of the UK Joining the EEC: A General Equilibrium Approach.” Review of Economic Studies 44(1), 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Industry and Energy (1993–94) “Challenges and Perspectives on the Petroleum Activity on the Continental Ridge.” Stortingsmelding Nr. 26. (In Norwegian only)

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1993–94) “On membership in the European Union.” Stortingsmelding nr. 40. (In Norwegian only)

  • Norton, Roger D., Pasquale L. Scandizzo, and Linda W. Zimmerman (1986) “Portugals Entry Into the EEC: Aggregate and Distributional Effects Determined by Means of a General Equilibrium Model.” Journal of Policy Modeling 8(2), 149–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantelis, Capros, Pavlos Karadeloglou, and Gregory Mentzas (1991) “Market Imperfections in a General Equilibrium Framework: An Empirical Analysis.” Economic Modelling 8(1), 116–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, L. Alan (1992) “European trade and welfare after ‘1992’.” Discussion Paper, No. 678, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowitz, E., Fæhn, T., Grünfeld, L.A. et al. Can a Wealthy Economy Gain from an EU Membership? Adjustment Costs and Long Term Welfare Effects of Full Integration—The Norwegian Case. Open Economies Review 8, 211–231 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008286630510

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008286630510

Navigation