Skip to main content
Log in

Canonical Decomposition of Steerable Functions

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a general mathematical formulation for the problem of constructing steerable functions. The formulation is based on Lie group theory and is thus applicable to transformations which are Lie groups, such as, rotation, translation, scaling, and affine transformation. For one-parameter and Abelian multi-parameter Lie transformation groups, a canonical decomposition of all possible steerable functions, derived using the Jordan decomposition of matrices, is developed. It is shown that any steerable function under Lie transformation groups can be described using this decomposition. Finally, a catalog of steerable functions for several common multi-parameter image transformation groups is also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Alvarez, F. Guichard, P. L. Lions, and J. M. Morel, “Axioms and fundamental equations of image processing,” Arch. Rational Mechanics, Vol. 123, No.3, pp. 199–257, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Amari, “Invariant structures of signal and feature spaces in pattern recognition problems,” RAAG Memoirs, Vol. 4, pp. 19–32, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Amari, “Feature spaces which admit and detect invariant signal transformations,” in Proc. 4th ICPR, 1978, pp. 452–456.

  4. A. Cohen, An Introduction to The Lie Theory of One-Parameter Groups; with Applications to the Solution of Differential Equations, D. C. Heath & Co.: Boston, New York, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Ferraro and T. Caelli, “Lie transformation groups, integral transforms, and invariant pattern recognition,” Spatial Vision, Vol. 8, No.1, pp. 33–44, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Fleet, “Computation of component image velocity from local phase information,” IJCV, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 77–104, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Fleet and A. Jepson, “Phase-based disparity measurement,” CVGIP-IU, Vol. 53, No.2, pp. 198–210, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Freeman and E. Adelson, “The design and use of steerable filters,” IEEE T-PAMI, Vol. 13, No.9, pp. 891–906, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Gotsman, “Constant-time filtering by singular value decomposition,” Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 13, No.2, pp. 153–163, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Granlund and H. Knutsson, Signal Processing for Computer Vision, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Hel-Or and P. Teo, “A common framework for steerability, motion estimation and invariant feature detection,” Technical Report STAN-CS-TN-96-28, Stanford University, 1996.

  12. M. Hu, “Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants,” IRE Trans. Information Theory, February, pp. 179–187, 1962.

  13. R. Lenz, Group Theoretical Methods in Image Processing, Springer-Verlag: Berlin; New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Liu, T. Hong, M. Herman, and R. Chellappa, “A reliable optical flow algorithm using 3-D hermite polynomials,” Technical Report CS-TR-3291, University of Maryland, 1994.

  15. R. Manduchi and P. Perona, “Pyramidal implementation of deformable kernels,” in Proc. IEEE ICIP, 1995, pp. 378–381.

  16. R. Manmatha, “A framework for recovering affine transforms using points, lines or image brightness,” in Proc. IEEE CVPR, Seattle, WA, 1994, pp. 141–146.

  17. M. Michaelis and G. Sommer, “A Lie group-approach to steerable filters,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 16, No.11, pp. 1165–1174, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Nimeroff, E. Simoncelli, and J. Dorsey, “Efficient re-rendering of naturally illuminated environments,” in 5th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 1994.

  19. P. J. Olver, G. Sapiro, and A. Tannenbaum, “Differential invariant signatures and flows in computer vision: A symmetry group approach,” in Geometry Driven Diffusion in Computer Vision, B. Romeny (Ed.), Kluwer: Boston, 1994, pp. 255–306.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. J. Olver, G. Sapiro, and A. Tannenbaum, “Invariant geometric evolutions of surfaces and volumetric smoothing,” SIAM J. of Appl. Math., Vol. 57, No.1, pp. 176–194, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Perona, “Deformable kernels for early vision,” IEEE T-PAMI, Vol. 17, No.5, pp. 488–499, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Romeny, Geometry Driven Diffusion in Computer Vision, Kluwer: Boston, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Segman, J. Rubinstein, and Y. Zeevi, “The canonical coordinate method for pattern deformation: theoretical and computational considerations,” IEEE T-PAMI, Vol. 14, No.12, pp. 1171–1183, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Simoncelli and H. Farid, “Steerable wedge filters,” in Proc. ICCV, Boston, MA, 1995, pp. 189–194.

  25. E. Simoncelli, W. Freeman, E. Adelson, and D. Heeger, “Shiftable multiscale transforms,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, Vol. 38, No.2, pp. 587–607, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Strang, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.: San Deigo, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Teo and Y. Hel-Or, “Design of multi-parameter steerable functions using cascade basis reduction,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, to be published.

  28. Y. Xiong and S. Shafer, “Moment and hypergeometric filters for high precision computation of focus, stereo and optical flow,” Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-94-28, Carnegie Mellon University, 1994.

  29. Y. Xiong and S. Shafer, “Moment filters for high precision computation of focus and stereo,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1995, pp. 108–113.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hel-Or, Y., Teo, P.C. Canonical Decomposition of Steerable Functions. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 9, 83–95 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008274211102

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008274211102

Navigation