Skip to main content
Log in

Do Interest Rates Follow Unit-Root Processes? Evidence from Cross-Maturity Treasury Bill Yields

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abstract. It is widely reported in the literature that interest rates follow integrated processes. Many empirical studies have, in fact, taken this result as a maintained hypothesis. This article demonstrates that the failure to reject the hypothesis that interest rates contain a unit root may be due to the severe power problem of standard test procedures in small samples. We analyze a panel of cross-maturity Treasury-bill yield series by employing a panel-based test. This test exploits cross-maturity variations of the data to improve estimation efficiency and is more powerful than standard tests for unit roots. The critical values of the test statistics are computed by Monte Carlo simulations tailored to our samples. It is found that the null hypothesis that each yield series contains a unit root can be decisively rejected. Our findings cast some doubt on previous studies that rely on the nonstationarity assumption of interest rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradley, M.G., and S.A. Lumpkin, “The Treasury Yield Curve as a Cointegrated System.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27, 449–463, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.Y., and P. Perron, “Pitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know About Unit Roots.” In NBER Macroeconomic Annual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Campbell, J.Y., and R.J. Shiller, “Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models.” Journal of Political Economy 95, 1062–1088, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J.H., “A Critique of the Application of Unit Root Tests.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 15, 275–284, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, D.N., J.C. Nankervis, N.E. Savin, and C.H. Whiteman, “The Power Problems of Unit Root Tests in Time Series with Autoregressive Errors.” Journal of Econometrics 323–343, (1992).

  • Dickey, D.A., and W.A. Fuller, “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427–481, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D.A., and W.A. Fuller, “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427–431, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F., and C.W.J. Granger, “Cointegration and Error Correction Representation, Estimation and Testing.” Econometrica 55, 251–276, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engsted, T., and C. Tanggaard, “Cointegration and the U.S. Term Structure.” Journal of Banking and Finance 18, 167–181, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., and K. Lewis, “Do Stationary Risk Premia Explain It All? Evidence from the Term Structure.” Journal of Monetary Economics 33, 285–318, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., and R.R. Bliss, “The Information in Long-Maturity Forward Rates.” American Economic Review 77, 680–692, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M.R., and K. Ramaswamy, “A Test of the Cox, Ingersoll and Ross Model of the Term Structure.” Review of Financial Studies 6, 619–658, (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A.D., H.M. Anderson, and C.W.J. Granger, “A Cointegration Analysis of Treasury Bill Yields.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74, 117–126, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C., Analysis of Panel Data. Econometric Society Monograph No. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., and C. Lin, “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties.” Mimeo, University of California, San Diego, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J.G., “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests.” In R. F. Engle and C. W. J. Granger (eds.), Long-run Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F.S., “What Does the Term Structure Tell Us About Future Inflation?” Journal of Monetary Economics 25, 77–95, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C.R., and C.I. Plosser, “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series.” Journal of Monetary Economics 10, 139–162, (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron, P., “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Further Evidence from a New Approach.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 297–332, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron, P., “The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis.” Econometrica 55, 277–302, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.C.B., and P. Perron, “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression.” Biometrika 75, 335–346, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D., “International Patterns of Growth: I. Persistence in Cross-Country Disparities.” Mimeo, MIT, (1990).

  • Rose, A.K., “Is the Real Interest Rate Stable?” Journal of Finance 43, 1095–1112, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, S.E., and D.A. Dickey, “Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive Moving Average Models of Unknown Order.” Biometrica 71, 599–608, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, G.S., “Benchmarking the Expectations Hypothesis of the Interest-Rate Term Structure: An Analysis of Cointegration Vectors.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10, 347–366, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, H.K., and M.W. Watson, “Testing for Common Trends.” Journal of American Statistical Association 83, 1097–1107, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Zhang, H. Do Interest Rates Follow Unit-Root Processes? Evidence from Cross-Maturity Treasury Bill Yields. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 8, 69–81 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008244721492

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008244721492

Navigation