Skip to main content
Log in

On the Efficiency of Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses how conditional heteroskedasticity models can be estimated efficiently without imposing strong distributional assumptions such as normality. Using the generalized method of moments (GMM) principle, we show that for a class of models with a symmetric conditional distribution, the GMM estimates obtained from the joint estimating equations corresponding to the conditional mean and variance of the model are efficient when the instruments are chosen optimally. A simple ARCH(1) model is used to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed estimation procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bollerslev, T. P., “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics 31, 309–328, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. P., “A Conditionally Heteroskedasticity Time Series Model for Security Prices and Rates of Return Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 542–547, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. P., R. Y. Chou and K. F. Kroner, “ARCH Modelling in Finance: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Econometrics 52, 5–69, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. P., R. F. Engle and D. B. Nelson, “ARCH Models.” in R. F. Engle and D. McMadden eds. The Handbook of Econometrics, Vol 4. Elsevier: Nort Holland, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. P. and J. M. Wooldridge, “Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Models With Time Varying Covariances.” Discussion Paper 505, Masachussetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 1988.

  • Chamberlain, G., “Asymptotic Efficiency in Estimation with Conditional Moment Restriction.” Journal of Econometrics 34, 305–334, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and J. G. MacKinnon, “Specification Tests Based on Artificial Regression.” International Economic Review 25, 485–502, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity With Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation.” Econometrica 50, 987–1007, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. and T. P. Bollerslev, “Modelling the Persistence of Conditional Variances.” Econometrics Review 5, 1–50, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. and G. Gonzales-Rivera, “Semiparametric ARCH Models.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 9, 345–360, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., D. F. Hendry and J. F. Richard, “Exogeneity.” Econometrica 51, 277–304, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., D. M. Lillien and R. P. Robins, “Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure.” Econometrica 55, 391–407, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, K. R., G. W. Schwert and E. F. Stambaugh, “Expected Stock Returns and Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics 19, 3–29, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, J., G. Moore and S. Schuh, “Estimating the Linear-Quadratic Inventory Model: Maximum Likelihood Versus Generalized Method of Moments.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 93-11, Federal Reserve Board, Wasihington, D. C., (April 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, A. R., D. Hsieh and G. Tauchen, “On Fitting a Recalcitrant Series: The Pound/Dollar Exchange Rate. 1974–83.” in W. A. Barnett, J. Powell and G. E. Tauchen eds. Nonparametric and Semiparametric Methods in Econometrics and Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. P., “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimator.” Econometrica 50, 1029–1054, (July 1982).

  • Hong, C., “Options, Volatilities and the Hedge Strategy.” unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at San Diego, Department of Economics, 1988.

  • Li, David X. and T. S. Wirjanto, “Estimating Functions and Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models, unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo, 1996.

  • Newey, W. K., “Efficient Instrumental Variables Estimation of Non-linear Moels.” Econometrica 58, 809–837, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagan, A. R and Y. Jung, “Understanding the Failure of Some Instrumental Variables Estimators.” Mimeo, Australian National University, (June 1993).

  • Rich, R., J. Raymond and J. S. Butler, “Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedastic Models.” Economics Letters 35, 179–185, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. M. “Asymptotically Efficient Estimation in the Presence of Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form.” Econometrica 55, 875–891, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, J. C. and J. Wigender, “Skewness Persistence in Common Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21, 335–341, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, D. and J. H. Stock, “Instrumental Variables Regressions With Weak Instruments.” National Bureau of Economic Research Technical Working Paper No. 151, (January 1994).

  • Weiss, A. A., “ARMA Models with ARCH Errors.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 15, 129–143, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. A., “Asymptotic Theory for ARCH Models: Estimation and Testing.” Econometric Theory 2, 107–131, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models.” Econometrica 50, 1–26, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirjanto, T. S., “On Asymptotically Efficient Estimation of a Class of Conditionally Heteroskedastic Nonlinear Regression Models.” Waterloo Economic Series. Working Paper No. 9115, University of Waterloo, (August 1991).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, T.Y., Wirjanto, T. On the Efficiency of Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 10, 21–37 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008244029475

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008244029475

Navigation