Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biological control: Premises, ecological input and Mimosa pigra in the wetlands of Australia's Top End

  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adverse impacts of weeds on natural ecosystems, together with the inadequate outcomes from treating weeds as a symptom, have escalated interest in finding efficacious control methods. With the aim of protecting wetlands from invasive weeds, this contribution uses the woody shrub Mimosa pigra L. (mimosa) as a case history to examine the methodology of classical biological control and the reasons for the widely accepted 75% failure rate. Overall objectives are for all biocontrol agents to have the opportunity to fully express their potential and to insure that limited resources are spent wisely on attainable weed control. The three main conclusions were that (1) the premises on which biocontrol is based has restricted advancement of this method; (2) monitoring is the logical first step to improving the selection of agents and release sites; and (3) it may be more cost-effective to introduce fewer agents that have undergone agent/plant and host/home range pre- and post-release ecological studies. Weed control may remain elusive unless advantage is taken of every beneficial result. Innovative assistance to agents and the integration of different control methods may preserve a role for weed biological control and has the potential to be of great importance for future weed management. It is proposed that the climate in the Top End of the Northern Territory and the lack of competition on the floodplains has contributed to mimosa's invasiveness. Climate may also underly the difficulties faced by agents. Agents appear unable to impart effective control in the dry season because of low numbers which relates to mimosa's poor growth; nor in the wet season, when the impact from high numbers of agents is outstripped by mimosa's growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amor, R.L and Piggin, C.M. 1977. Factors influencing the establishment and success of exotic plants in Australia. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 10: 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingelli, P. 1996. A taxonomic, biogeographical and ecological overview of invasive woody plants. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 121–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossey, B., Malecki, R.A., Schroeder, D and Skinner, L. 1997. A biological weed control programme using insects against purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America. In: Moran, V.C. and Hoffman, J.H. (eds). pp. 351–355. Proceedings of the IX International symposium on biological control of weeds. Stellenbosch, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowmer, K.H. 1979. Management of aquatic weeds in Australian irrigation systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th Asian Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Sydney. pp. 219–222.

  • Bowmer, K.H. 1981. Nutrient enrichment eutrophication: Causes of problem plant growth – possibilities for regulation. In: Sainty. G.R and Jacobs, S.W.L. 1981. Waterplants of New South Wales. Water Resources Commission of NSW. Sydney. 550 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, C.M.F. 1996. A framework for designing a monitoring programme. In: Tomas-Vives, P., Finlayson, P.M., Goldsmith, F.B., Grillas, P and Rufino, R. (eds). pp. 25–34. Monitoring Mediterranean wetlands: A methodological guide. Wetlands International, Slimbridge, UK and ICN, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, C.M., Cullen, P., Mitchell, D. and Chick, A. 1986. An assessment of a natural wetland receiving sewage effluent. Aust. J. Ecol. 11: 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, C.M., Storrs, M.J. and Lindner, G. 1997. Degradation and monitoring of wetlands in the Alligator Rivers Region of northern Australia. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 5: 19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, G.J., Wilson, C.G. and Gillett, J.D. 1990. The abundance of native insects on the introduced weed Mimosa pigra in Northern Australia. J. Trop. Ecol. 6: 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevstad, F.S. 1997. Establishment of weed control agents under the influence of demographic stochasticity, environmental variability and Allee effects. In: Moran, V.C. and Hoffman, J.H. (eds). pp. 261–267. Proceedings of the IX International symposium on biological control of weeds. Stellenbosch, South Africa.

  • Harley, K., Gillet, J., Winder, J., Forno, W., Segura, R. Miranda, H and Kassulke, R. 1995. Natural enemies of Mimosa pigra and Mimosa berlandieri (Mimosaceae) and prospects for biocontrol of M. pigra. Environ. Entomol. 24: 1664–1678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. 1991. Classical biocontrol of weeds: its definition, selection of effective agents, and administrative – political problems. Can. Entomol. 123: 827–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, P.E. 1996. The effect of insect-fungus interactions on the autumn growth and over-wintering of Rumex crispus and R. obtusifolius seedlings. J. Ecol. 84: 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard, T.A., Segura, R., Martinez, M. and Forno, I.W. 1997. Biology and host range of the green seed weevil, Sibinia fastigiata for biocontrol of Mimosa pigra. Biocont. Sci. Tech. 7: 631–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R.L. 1997. Agent performance: synthesis of session 5. In: Moran, V.C. and Hoffman, J.H. (eds). pp. 423–426. Proceedings of the IX International symposium on biological control of weeds. Stellenbosch, South Africa.

  • Hobbs, R.J. 1991. Disturbance: a precursor to weed invasion in native vegetation. Plant Prot. Quart. 6: 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J. and Huennecke, L.F. 1992. Disturbance, diversity and invasion – implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 6: 324–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J. and Humphries, S.E. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol. 9: 761–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M.E. 1996. Consequences for host population levels of increasing natural enemy species richness in classical biocontrol. Amer. Nat. 147: 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J.H. 1990. Interactions between three weevil species in the biocontrol of Sesbania punicea (Fabaceae): the role of simulation models in evaluation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 32: 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J.H. 1991a. Introduction. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 37: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J.H. 1991b. (ed). Special Issue: Biological control of weeds in South Africa. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. volume 37. 255 pp.

  • Hoffmann, J.H. and Moran, V.C. 1991. Biological control of Sesbania punicea (Fabaceae) in South Africa. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 37: 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, M. and Rea, N. 1998. Biological control agents of Mimosa pigra L. and their release history. CSIRO Technical Publication No. 1000. Darwin.

  • Humphries, S.E., Groves, R.H. and Mitchell, D.S. 1991. Plant invasions of Australian ecosystems: a status review and management directions. Kowari. 2: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, G.C. and Beardsley, J.W. 1994. Big headed ants, Pheidolae megacephala: interference with the biological control of gray pineapple mealy bugs. In: Williams, D.F. (ed.). pp. 199–205. Exotic Ants. Westview Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, S. 1989. Implications of leaf longevity, leaf nutrient re-absorption and translocation for the resource economy of five evergreen plant species. Oikos. 56: 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, M.H. 1989. Biocontrol of weeds worldwide: trends, rates of success and the future. Biocontrol News and Information. 10: 300–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, M.H., Kerr, J.D. and Chan, R.R. 1984. Biocontrol of weeds: an evaluation. Prot. Ecol. 7: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P.M. 1983. Influence of vegetation structure on herbivore populations: resource concentration and herbivore movement. In: Denno, R. and McClure, M. (eds). pp. 259–289. Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J.H. 1985. Ecological theory and choice of biological control agents. In: Delfosse, E.S. (ed.). pp. 13–26. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Vancouver. Canada.

  • Lonsdale, W.M. 1988. Litterfall in an Australian population of Mimosa pigra, an invasive tropical shrub. J. Trop. Ecol. 4: 393–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, W.M. 1993a. Losses from the seed bank of Mimosa pigra: Soil microorganisms vs. temperature fluctuations. J. App. Ecol. 30: 654–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, W.M. 1993b. Rates of spread of an invading species – Mimosa pigra in northern Australia. J. Ecol. 81: 513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, W.M. and Abrecht, D.G. 1989. Seedling mortality in Mimosa pigra, an invasive tropical shrub. J. Ecol. 77: 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, W.M. and Segura, R. 1987. A demographic comparison of native and introduced populations of Mimosa pigra. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Australian Weeds Conference. Sydney. pp. 163–166.

  • Lonsdale, W.M. Harley, K.L.S. and Miller, I.L. 1985. The biology of Mimosa pigra L. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Australian Weeds Conference. Adelaide. pp.134–136.

  • Maron, J.L. and Connors, P.G. 1996. A native nitrogen-fixing shrub facilitates weed invasion. Oecologia. 105: 302–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, R. 1991. Evolution of resistance in plants to herbivores. Evol. Trends Plants 5: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, S., Ladiges, P.Y. and Adams, G. 1988. Plant species richness and invasion by exotics in relation to disturbance of wetland communities on the riverine plain. Aust. J. Ecol. 13: 361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D.S. 1978. Aquatic weeds in Australian inland waters. Australian Government Publishing Service. Canberra. 189 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, M.E. and Mack, R.N. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol. 25: 1009–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, C.M. and Fritz, R.S. 1996. Genetic and soil-nutrient effects on the abundance of herbivores on willows. Oecologia. 105: 388–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, P.L. and Polunin, N.V.C. 1986. From swamp to lake: recent changes in a lowland tropical lake. J. Ecol. 74: 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetta, F.D. 1993. A system of assessing proposed plant introductions for weed potential. Plant Prot. Quart. 8: 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panetta, F.D. and McKee, J. 1997. Recruitment of the invasive ornamental, Schinus terebinthifolius is dependent upon frugivores. Aust. J. Ecol. 22: 432–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pheloung, P.C. 1995. Determining the weed potential of new plant introductions to Australia. Agriculture Protection Board of Western Australia. Perth. 27 pp.

  • Price, P.W. 1991. The plant vigour hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos. 62: 244–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, N. and Ganf, G.G. 1994. How emergent plants experience water regime in a Mediterranean-type wetland. Aquat. Bot. 49: 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, N. and Storrs, M.J. 1998. Preventing weed invasions in the wetlands of Australia's Top End. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. (in press).

  • Rejmanek, M. and Richardson, D.M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecol. 77: 1655–1661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringold, P.L, Alegria, J., Czaplewski, R.L., Mulder, B.S., Tolle, T. and Burnett, K. 1994. Adaptive monitoring design for ecosystem management. Ecol. App. 6: 745–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Room, P.M., Julien, M.H. and Forno, I.W. 1989. Vigorous plants suffer most from herbivores: latitude, nitrogen and biological control of the weed Salvinia molesta. Oikos. 54: 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.K. 1993. Comparison of the ecology of bitou bush and boneseed (Chrysanthemoides monilifera) in South Africa and Australia. Proceedings of the 10th Australian and 14th Asian-Pacific Weeds Conference. Brisbane. 1: 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. and Stiling, P. 1996. How risky is biological control? Ecol. 77: 1965–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.S. and Wilson, C.G. 1995a. Effect of an artificial diet on Carmenta mimosa Eichlin and Passoa (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae), a biocontrol agent for Mimosa pigra L. in Australia. J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 34: 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.S. and Wilson, C.G. 1995b. Close to the edge: microhabitat selection by Neurostrota gunniella Busck (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) a biocontrol agent for Mimosa pigra. L. in Australia. J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 34: 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule, M.E. 1990. The onslaught of alien species and other challenges in the coming decades. Conserv. Biol. 4: 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, B. 1995. Adaptive allocation of resources and lifehistory trade-offs in aphids relative to plant quality. Oecologia. 102: 246–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storrs, M.J. 1996. A weed management strategy for Kakadu National Park 1996-2001. Unpublished report to the Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Jabiru. 88 pp.

  • Storrs, M.J. and Julien, M.H. 1996. Salvinia: A handbook for the integrated control of Salvinia molesta in Kakadu National Park. Northern Landscapes Occasional Papers, Paper No. 1. ANCA. Darwin. 58 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.A. and Tulloch, D. 1985. Rainfall in the wet-dry tropics: extreme events at Darwin and similarities between years during the period 1870–1983 inclusive. Aust. J. Ecol. 10: 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. 1990. Constraints and trade-offs: towards a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos. 58: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage, J.K. and Mills, N.J. 1992. Biological Control. In: Crawley, M.J. (ed). pp. 412–430. Natural Enemies. Blackwell Scientific. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J.B. and O'Hop, J. 1985. Life on a fast pad: water lily leaf beetle impact on water lilies. Ecol. 66: 1534–1544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapshere, A.J. 1985. Effectiveness of biological control agents for weeds: present quandaries. Agric Ecosyst. Environ. 13: 261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, G.L. and Cobb, N.S. 1992. The impact of plant stress on herbivore population dynamics. In: Bernays, E.A. (ed.) pp. 167–226. Insect–Plant Interactions. vol IV. CRC Press. Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C.G. 1989. Post dispersal seed predation of an exotic weed, Mimosa pigra L., in the Northern Territory. Aust. J. Ecol. 14: 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. 1960. A review of the biocontrol of insects and weeds in Australia and Australian New Guinea. Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control Technical Communication No.1. Canberra.

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. N. Rea

    Present address: Mulga Data Services, P.O. Box 567, Palmerston, NT, Australia, 0831

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tropical Ecosystems Research Centre, CSIRO Entomology, P.M.B. 44, Winnellie, NT, Australia, 0822

    N. Rea

Authors
  1. N. Rea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rea, N. Biological control: Premises, ecological input and Mimosa pigra in the wetlands of Australia's Top End. Wetlands Ecology and Management 5, 227–242 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008232603892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008232603892

Search

Navigation