Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Two Switched Current Differentiators at Extremely Low Current Level

  • Published:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We are presenting comparative studies on two switched current (SI)differentiators; one is a classical version, the other is a cumulativeversion. Both are applied to smart pixel time-domain differentiation. Inboth differentiators, the differentiation is calculated by subtracting theinstantaneous photocurrent from a previously sampled one. The key issue inthis case is to obtain accuracy even with an extremely low current level(from pA to nA). The operability of both SI memories is verified throughchip tests. Within an optical input dynamic range of five decades and aminimum level of 2 Lux (1pA in current), the maximum current reproductionerror rate is 10% for the first one and 6% for the second.Furthermore, the cumulability of the second version is also confirmed by ourtests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. J. Basel, “Active, Optical Range Imaging Sensor.”Machine Vision and Applications1(2), pp. 127–152.

  2. Y. Ni and al., “An Analog Spot Position Coding Retina for Active Obstacle Detection.”International Journal of Robotics & Automation8(2), pp. 77–83, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. J. Daubert, D. Vallanncourt, and Y. P. Tsividis, “Current copier cells.”Electronics Letters24(25), pp. 1560–1562, Dec. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Wegmann and E. Vittoz, “Analysis and Improvements of Accurate Dynamic Current Mirrors.”IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits25(3), pp. 699–706, June 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Eichenberger and W. Guggenbuhl, “On charge Injection in Analog MOS Switches and Dummy Switch Compensation Techniques.”IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems37(2), pp. 256–264, Feb. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Espejo, A. Rodriguez, R. Domonquez-Castro, and J. L. Huertas, “A Modified Dummy-switch Technique for Tunable Feedthrough Cancellation in Switched-current Circuits.” in Proceedings IEECIRC, Spain, 1993, pp. 270–273.

  7. S. M. Sze, “Physics of Semiconductor Device.” Wiley-Interscience Publication, J. Willey & Sons, 1981.

  8. E. A. Vittoz, “Analog VLSI Signal Processing: Why, Where and How.”J. of VLSI Signal Processing8, “Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing.” pp. 27–44, July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. J. V. Overstraeten, G. Declerck and G. L. Broux, “Inadquacy of the Classical Theory of the MOS Transistor Operating in Weak Inversion.”IEEE Trans. on Electron DevicesED-20(12) pp. 1150–1153, Dec. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. R. Troutman, “Subthreshold Design Considerations for Insulated Gate Field-Effect transistors.”IEEE J. Solid-State Circuitspp. 55–60, April 1974.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, C., Devos, F. & Ni, Y. A Comparison of Two Switched Current Differentiators at Extremely Low Current Level. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing 16, 35–45 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008217901525

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008217901525

Navigation