Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Poverty, Income Distribution and Policy Making

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the key distributional issues arising from the regulation of the environment and the management of natural resources. The paper is divided into a section dealing with poverty and a section dealing with broader income distribution effects. Although there is much discussion of the linkages of poverty to environmental degradation, empirical studies establishing these linkages are few. The relationship is critically dependent on the institutional structures in the countries concerned and how they respond to changing environmental pressures. On the broader distributional impacts, the papers focusses on the analysis of ganiers and losers from environmental regulations. The analysis is complex because the direct incidence is not the same as the final incidence. Much of the work has looked only at the former. In addition, the political economy of regulation needs to pay greater attention to impacts on key and vulnerable groups; more so than can be done by looking at broad income bands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1994), A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1991), Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Cambridge MA, USA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, K. and S. C. Gulati (1996), ‘Environmental Degradation and Population Movements: The Role of Property Right’, Environmental and Resource Economics 9(4), 383–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, K. and G. Kadekodi (1988), ‘Participatory Institutions: The Context of Common and Private Property Resource’, Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, K. M. and A. G. Schreiber (1994), Reversing the Spiral: The Population, Agriculture, and Environment Nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1995), ‘The Population Problem: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Economic Literature XXXIII, 1879–1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1996), ‘The Economics of the Environment’, Environment and Development 1, 387–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1996), Environmental and Resource Economics in the World of the Poor. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and K-G Mäler (1991), ‘The Environment and Emerging Development Issue’, Proceedings of the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, 1990 (Supplement to the World Bank Economic Review), 101–132.

  • Dorfman, R. (1977), ‘Incidence of the Benefits and Costs of Environmental Program’, American Economic Review 67, 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duraippah, A. (1996), Poverty and Environmental Degradation: A Literature Review and Analysis, CREED Working Paper Series No. 8. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland, G. S. and S. Devarajan (1996), Taxing Bads by Taxing Goods: Pollution Controls with Presumptive Charges. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D. L. Pritchett (1996), Environmental Degradation and the Demand for Children, Research Project on Social and Environmental Consequences of Growth-Oriented Policies, Working Paper No. 2. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, L. P., H. M. Peskin and E. Wolff (1979), ‘The Distributional Effects of Uniform Air Pollution’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 93, 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M. and A. B Krueger (1991), Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, Working Paper No. 3914. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. Jr. (1975), Who Pays for Clean Air? The Costs and Benefit Distribution of Automobile Emissions Standards. Cambridge MA, USA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. Jr. (1977), ‘Controlling Automotive Emissions: How to Save More Than $1 Billion Per Year and Help the Poor Too’, Public Policy 25(4), 527–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, W. (1981), The Distribution of Recreational Benefits from Improved Water Quality: A Micro-Simulation, Discussion Paper D-80, Quality of the Environment Division. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaganathan, V. N. (1989), Poverty, Public Policies and the Environment, Environment Working Paper No. 24. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, V., A. Markandya and R. Vossenaar (1998), Reconciling Trade and the Environment. Cheltenham: Elgar, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M. (1993), Do the Rich Pollute Less?, mimeo. New York: Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick, A. et al. (1996) ‘The Value of Health Benefits from Ambient Air Quality Improvements in Central and Eastern Europe’, Environmental and Resource Economics 7(4), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. K. and D. Hotchkiss (1988), Consequences of Deforestation for Women's Time Allocation, Agricultural Production and Nutrition in the Hills of Nepal, IFPRI Research Report No. 69. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1955), ‘Economic Growth and Income Inequality’, American Economic Review 45(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, R. (1992), ‘Environmental Degradation and Economic Openness in LDCs: The Poverty Linkage’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74, 1138–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, R. (1997), ‘Where Development Can or Cannot Go: The Role of Poverty-Environment Linkage’, Proceedings of the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, 1997. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markandya, A. (1994) ‘Criteria, Instruments and Tools for Sustainable Agricultural and Rural Development’, in A. Markandya, ed., Essays in Sustainable Development. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson (1986), Valuing Drinking Water Risk Reduction Using the Contingent Valuation Method: A Methodological Study of Risks from THM and Girardia. Report for the US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mink, S. D. (1993), ‘Poverty, Population and the Environment’, Environment Working Paper No. 189. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, M. (1989), ‘The Causes, Nature and Rate of Soil Degradation in the Northernmost States of Nigeria and an Assessment of the Role of Fertilizer in Counteracting the Process of Degradation’, Environment Working Paper No. 17, Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994), The Distributive Effects of Economic Instruments for Environmental Policy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankert, F. (1973), ‘Income Distribution and Different Levels of Development: A Survey of the Evidence’, International Labor Review.

  • Panayotou, T. (1993), Green Markets: The Economics of Sustainable Development. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1994), ‘Population: Delusion and Reality’, New York Review of Books XLI(15), 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (1995), ‘GreenTaxes and Charges: Policy and Practice in Britain and Germany. London: The Institute of Fiscal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, D. (1988), The Economics of Land Degradation in the Third World, Environment Working Paper No. 2. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D., M. Common and E. Barbier (1996), ‘Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Sustainable Development’, World Development 24(7), 1151–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. (1996), Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, H., O. Kuik and M. Benis (1995), Environmental Regulations as Trade Barriers for Developing Countries, CREED Working Paper No. 2. London: IIED.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992), World Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markandya, A. Poverty, Income Distribution and Policy Making. Environ Resource Econ 11, 459–472 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008209712672

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008209712672

Navigation