Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Appraisal and Environmental Policy in the European Union

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Revisions to the European Treaty of Union require some form of environmental appraisal – primarily risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis – of regulatory initiatives by the European Commission. A retrospective look at the emergence of environmental appraisal also shows that, while the Commission has made great advances in introducing cost-benefit or cost-effectiveness appraisals in recent years, past environmental decisions and overall environmental policy have not been informed by systematic appraisal techniques. Nor is it clear what role is now being played by risk assessments. While it is impossible to gauge the extent to which systematic appraisal procedures will save on regulatory and compliance expenditures, some indications are provided of the costs of past neglect of these procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AEA Technology (1996), Economic Evaluation of the Draft Incineration Directive. Luxembourg: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, C (1993), The Cost of Quality: Establishing Willingness to Pay in a Regulated Monopoly. Birmingham: Office of Water Regulation (OFWAT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coopers and Lybrand, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), London and Norwich, and Economics for the Environment Consultancy, London (EFTEC) (1997), Cost Benefit Analysis of the Different Municipal Solid Waste Systems: Objectives and Instruments for the Year 2000. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSERGE, EFTEC and Warren Spring Laboratory (1993), Externalities from Landfill and Incineration. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1992), The Fifth Environmental Action Programme: Towards Sustainability. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council (1994), ‘EC Directive 94/62/EC On Packaging and Packaging Waste’, Official Journal of the European Communities L365, 37(31): December.

  • Georgiou, S., I. Langford, I. Bateman and K. Turner (1998). ‘Determinants of Individuals’ Willingness to Pay for Perceived Reductions in Environmental Health Risks: A Case Study of Bathing Water Quality’, Environment and Planning, A, 30, 577–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. and W. Krewitt (1997), Benefits of an Acidification Strategy for the European Union. Brussels: European Commission, DGXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • IVM (Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University of Amsterdam, NILU and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (IIASA), (1998), Economic Evaluation of Air Quality for Sulphur Dioxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, Fine and Suspended Particulate Matter and Lead. Luxembourg: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvan, D. (1994), Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of the Directive Proposal on the Emissions of Incineration Plants. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazurek, J. (1996), ‘The Role of Health Risk Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis in Environmental Decision Making in Selected Countries: an Initial Survey’, Resources for the Future Discussion Papers, 96-36, Washington DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schall, J. (1992), ‘Does the Solid Waste Management Hierarchy Make Sense?’ School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, Program on Solid Waste Policy. Working Paper No. 1, October.

  • SEMA Group (1994), Economic Assessment of Materials Recycling versus Incineration with Energy Recovery of Household Wastes. Brussels: European Commission, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOFRES Conseil, Technische Universität Berlin, Institut f+r Kunstoffverarbeitung, and Boustead, I. (1997), Elements for a Cost-Effective Plastic Waste Management in the European Union: Objectives and Instruments for the Year 2000. Luxembourg: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touche Ross Management (1994), Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Proposed Council Directive on the Landfill of Waste. Brussels: European Commission, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Department of the Environment (1995), A Guide to Risk Assessment and Risk Management for Environmental Protection. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government (1990), This Common Inheritance: Britain's Environmental Strategy. CM 1200. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK House of Lords, Select Committee on the European Communities, Session 1994–1995, 1st Report, Bathing Water, HL Paper 6-I; and Session 1994–1995, 7th Report, Bathing Water Revisited, HL Paper 6-I, London: HMSO.

  • UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1992), Sixteenth Report: Freshwater Quality, CM. 1966. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearce, D.W. Environmental Appraisal and Environmental Policy in the European Union. Environ Resource Econ 11, 489–501 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008207715184

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008207715184

Navigation