The Effects of Setting Deposit Insurance Premiums to Target Insurance Fund Reserves

Abstract

A common feature of many insurance systems is that they are “backed” by an insurance fund and insurance premiums are adjusted to target this fund's reserves. This study analyzes the fund targeting policy of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). It examines the distortions to banks' cost of deposit financing that result from setting premiums in this manner. The study's framework is a multiperiod, multibank contingent claims model where the stochastic rates of return on individual banks' assets are assumed to be correlated and match the actual empirical distribution of a sample of U.S. banks. The model identifies factors that are likely to exacerbate distortions due to insurance mispricing. The relative merits of a targeting policy and a flat-rate insurance policy are discussed, and the real effects of insurance mispricing are estimated. A method for valuing a government subsidy under a reserve targeting policy is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. A.M. Best Company. Best's Insolvency Study: Property/Casualty Insurers 1969–1990. Oldwick, NJ: June 1991.

  2. Black, F., and M. Scholes. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy 81 (1973), 637-654.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyle, P. “Options Pricing: A Monte Carlo Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics 4 (1977), 323-338.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chan, Y.-S., S. Greenbaum, and A. Thakor. “Is Fairly Priced Deposit Insurance Possible?” Journal of Finance 47 (1992), 227-246.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooperstein, R., G. Pennacchi, and F.S. Redburn. “The Aggregate Cost of Deposit Insurance: A Multiperiod Analysis.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 4 (1995), 242-271.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, J., and S. Ross. “The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976), 145-166.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The First Fifty Years. Washington, DC: FDIC, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feldman, R. “When Should the FDIC Act Like a Private Insurance Company? When It Comes to Pricing, Not Reserves.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, The Region 12,no. 3 (1998), 43-50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Furlong, F. “Capital Regulation and Bank Lending.” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Economic Review 3 (1992), 23-33.

    Google Scholar 

  10. James, C. “The Losses Realized in Bank Failures.” Journal of Finance 46 (1991), 1223-1242.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marcus, A. “Deregulation and Bank Financial Policy.” Journal of Banking and Finance 8 (1984), 557-565.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marcus, A., and I. Shaked. “The Valuation of FDIC Deposit Insurance Using Option-Pricing Estimates.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 16 (1984), 446-460.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mehra, R., and E. Prescott. “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle.” Journal of Monetary Economics 15 (1985), 145-161.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merton, R.C. “The Theory of Rational Option Pricing.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4 (1973), 141-183.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Merton, R.C. “An Analytic Derivation of the Cost of Deposit Insurance and Loan Guarantees: An Application of Modern Option Pricing Theory.” Journal of Banking and Finance 1 (1977), 3-11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pennacchi, G. “Alternative Forms of Deposit Insurance: Pricing and Bank Incentive Issues.” Journal of Banking and Finance 11 (1987a), 291-312.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pennacchi, G. “A Reexamination of the Over-(or Under-) Pricing of Deposit Insurance.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 19 (1987b), 340-360.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rubinstein, M. “The Valuation of Uncertain Income Streams and the Pricing of Options.” Bell Journal of Economics 7 (1976), 407-425.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sheehan, K. “Capitalization of the Bank Insurance Fund.” Division of Research and Statistics, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Working Paper 98-1, 1998.

  20. Taur, R. “Re-estimation of Furlong's Capital Adjustment Process.” Memo, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, July 1997.

  21. U.S. General Accounting Office. Deposit Insurance: Overview of Six Foreign Systems. GAO/NSIAD-91-104, February 1991.

  22. U.S. General Accounting Office. Financial Audit: Resolution Trust Corporation's 1995 and 1994 Financial Statements. GAO/AIMD-96-123, July 1996.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pennacchi, G.G. The Effects of Setting Deposit Insurance Premiums to Target Insurance Fund Reserves. Journal of Financial Services Research 16, 153–180 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008188308504

Download citation

  • deposit insurance
  • FDIC