Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Industruct: A Scale for the Measurement of Perceptions of Industry Structure

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of INDUSTRUCT, an instrument designed to measure perceptions of industry structure based on Porter's five competitive forces formulation, is described. A seven-step procedure based on psychometric principles was used in the process. The results indicate that a valid five dimensional scale can be defined and an instrument developed to provide a satisfactory basis for implementation in future theory testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C. et al. (1997). “Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces,” Journal of Marketing, 61, 3, 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J.S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition: Their Character And Consequences In Manufacturing Industries, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T., and Fiske, D.W. (1959). “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix,” Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, C. (1984). COSAN: A Fortran program for the analysis of covariance structures. Armidale: Behavioural Studies, University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C. (1988). “Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves R.M. (1989). Survey Errors and Survey Costs, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J.A. (1981). “A four stage factor analystic approach to studying behavioural domains,” Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Li-tze, and Bentler P.M. (1999). “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives,” Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain S.C. (1990). Marketing Planning and Strategy (3rd ed.), Cincinnati: Southwestern Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1991). Marketing Management Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R.F., Laczniak, E.R. and Harris W.O. (1986). “Toward the Measurement of Competitive Structure: An Initial Assessment of Porter's Framework, in T.A. Shimp et al (eds), American Marketing Association Educators Proceedings, 2, 239–244.

  • Marsh, H.W. and Bailey, M. (1991). “Confirmatory factor analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: A Comparison of Alternative Methods,” Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. Balla, J. and McDonald, R.P. (1988). “Goodness-of-fit indices in comfirmatory factor analysis. The effect of sample size,” Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E.S. (1939). “Price And Production Policies Of Large Scale Enterprise”, American Economic Review, 29 (March Suppl), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar, P.P. (1993). “Performance Effects of Information Asymmetry and Economies of Scope in Diversified Service Firms,” Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1, 28–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecotich A., Laczniak G.R., Lusch R.F. and B. Carroll, “Perceptions of Future Competitive Structure: An Empirical Assessment of Porter's Framework,” in C.T. Allen et al (eds), Marketing Theory and Applications American Marketing Association Winter Educators Conference Proceedings, 177–188, January, 1992.

  • Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques For Analyzing Industries And Competitors, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1985). “The Competitive Advantage”, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R.P., Schendel Dan, and Teece, D.J. (1991). “Strategic Management and Economics,” Strategic Management Journal, 12, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. (1970). Industrial Market Structure And Economic Performance, Rand McNally College Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F.E. (Jr) (1979). Industrial Marketing Strategy, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, B.A. (1985). “Introduction To Special Issue On Competition In Marketing”, Journal Of Marketing Research, 22 (August), 229–236.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pecotich, A., Hattie, J. & Low, L.P. Development of Industruct: A Scale for the Measurement of Perceptions of Industry Structure. Marketing Letters 10, 403–416 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008174623201

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008174623201

Navigation