Skip to main content
Log in

Collusive Bidding: Lessons from the FCC Spectrum Auctions

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) spectrum auctions use a simultaneous ascending auction design. Bidders bid on numerous communication licenses simultaneously, with bidding remaining open on all licenses until no bidder is willing to bid higher on any license. With full revelation of bidding information, simultaneous open bidding allows bidders to send messages to their rivals, telling them on which licenses to bid and which to avoid. These strategies can help bidders coordinate a division of the licenses, and enforce the proposed division by directed punishments. We examine solutions to mitigate collusive bidding in the spectrum auctions, and then apply these ideas to the design of daily electricity auctions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ausubel, L. M., and P. Cramton. 1999. “The Optimality of Being Efficient.” Working Paper, University of Maryland.

  • Ausubel, L. M., and P. Cramton. 1996. “Demand Reduction and Inefficiency in Multi-unit Auctions.” Working Paper, University of Maryland.

  • Ausubel, L. M., P. Cramton, R. P. McAfee, and J. McMillan. 1997. “Synergies in Wireless Telephony: Evidence from the Broadband PCS Auctions.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 63: 497–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, L. M., and J. A. Schwartz. 1999. “The Ascending Auction Paradox.” Working Paper, University of Maryland.

  • Baldwin, L. H, R. C. Marshall, and J.-F. Richard. 1997. “Bidder Collusion at Forest Service Timber Sales.” Journal of Political Economy 105: 657–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J., and P. Klemperer. 1996. “Auctions vs. Negotiations.” American Economic Review 86: 180–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bykowsky, M. M., R. J. Cull, and J. O. Ledyard. 2000. “Mutually Destructive Bidding: The FCC Auction Design Problem.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: forthcoming.

  • Cramton, P. 1995. “Money Out of Thin Air: The Nationwide Narrowband PCS Auction.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4: 267–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, P. 1997. “The FCC Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 63: 431–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, P., J. McMillan, P. Milgrom, B. Miller, B. Mitchell, D. Vincent, and R. Wilson. 1997. Package Bidding for Spectrum Licenses. Report 1b, Charles River Associates and Market Design Inc.

  • Cramton, P., J. McMillan, P. Milgrom, B. Miller, B. Mitchell, D. Vincent, and R. Wilson. 1998. Simultaneous Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding. Report 2, Charles River Associates and Market Design Inc.

  • Cramton, P., and J. Schwartz. 1999. “Collusive Bidding in the FCC Spectrum Auctions.” Working Paper, University of Maryland.

  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., and C. M. Kahn. 1998. “Low Revenue Equilibria in Simultaneous Auctions.” Working Paper, University of Illinois.

  • Fudenberg, D., and E. Maskin. 1986. “The Folk Theorem in Two-person Repeated Games with Discounting and Incomplete Information.” Econometrica 54: 533–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D. A., and R. C. Marshall. 1987. “Collusive Bidder Behavior at Single-object Second-price and English Auctions.” Journal of Political Economy 95: 1217–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J. 1986. Elements of Econometrics. Second Edition, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailath, G. J., and P. Zemsky. 1991. “Collusion in Second Price Auctions with Heterogeneous Bidders.” Games and Economic Behavior 3: 467–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R. C., and M. J. Meurer. 1999. “The Economics of Bidder Collusion.” in Game Theory and Business Applications. Kalyan Chatterjee (ed), Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R P., and J. McMillan. 1996. “Analyzing the Airwaves Auction.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. 1994. “Selling Spectrum Rights.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. 2000. “Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction.” Journal of Political Economy 108: 245–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and R. J. Weber. 1982. “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding.” Econometrica. 50: 1089–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreton, P. S., and P. T. Spiller. 1998. “What's in the Air? Interlicense Synergies and Their Impact on the FCC's Broadband PCS License Auctions.” Journal of Law and Economics 41: 677–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, M. H., A. Pekec, and R. M. Harstad. 1998. “Computationally Manageable Combinatorial Auctions.” Management Science 44: 1131–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. J. 1997. “Making More from Less: Strategic Demand Reduction in the FCC Spectrum Auctions.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 63: 529–548.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cramton, P., Schwartz, J.A. Collusive Bidding: Lessons from the FCC Spectrum Auctions. Journal of Regulatory Economics 17, 229–252 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008174031940

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008174031940

Keywords

Navigation