Skip to main content
Log in

Habit Persistence in Time Series Models of Discrete Choice

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide a framework for modelling habit persistence in choice that integrates vector auto-regressive and moving-average (VARMA) time-series models with random coefficient Multinomial Probit (MNP) models. We provide two classes of models. In the first we assume that the error in the utility function has a general VARMA structure, and in the second we assume that structure for the regression coefficients. We provide an interpretation of these two classes of models. As an illustration, we re-analyse the A.C. Nielsen Company 1986/1987 scanner panel data on ketchup purchases and compare our model with two alternative state dependence models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ailawadi, Kusum L. Karen Gedenk, and Scott A. Nestlin. (1998). ‘Heterogeneity and Purchase Event Feedback and in Choice Models: An Empirical Analysis with Implications for Model Building,’ International Journal of Research in Marketing 16(3), 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allenby, Greg M. and Peter J. Lenk. (1994). ‘Modeling Household Purchase Behavior with Logistic Normal Regression,’ Journal of the American Statistical Association 89(428), 1218–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagni, P.M. and John D.C. Little. (1983). ‘A Logit Model of Brand Choice,’ Marketing Science, 2 (Summer), 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajivassiliou, Vassilis A. (1993). ‘Simulation Estimation Methods for Limited Dependent Variable Models.’ In Maddala G.S. Rao C.R. and Vinod H.D. (eds.), Handbook of Statistics, Vol 11.

  • Hansens, Dominique M. Len J. Parsons, and Randy L.L. Schultz. (1994). Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis, Amsterdam: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James (1983). ‘Statistical Models for Discrete Panel Data.’ In: Charles Manski and Daniel McFadden (eds.), Structural analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 114–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Morgan J. and Jane T. Landwehr. (1988). ‘Removing heterogeneity Bias from Logit Model Estimation,’ Marketing Science, 7 (Winter), 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, Michael P. (1997). ‘Modeling Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Consumer Choice Behavior,’ Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 15 (July), 310–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, Daniel. (1989). ‘A Method of Simulated Moments for the Estimation of Discrete Response Models without Numerical Integration,’ Econometrica 57(5), 995–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papatla, Puroshottam and Lakshman Krishnamurthi. (1996). ‘Measuring the Dynamic Effects of Promotions on Brand Choice,’ Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (February) 20–36.

  • Schwartz, G. (1978). ‘Estimating the Dimension of the Model,’ Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haaijer, R., Wedel, M. Habit Persistence in Time Series Models of Discrete Choice. Marketing Letters 12, 25–35 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008163801995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008163801995

Navigation