Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: Which Factors Matter?

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the explanation of variations in the growth between New Technology-based Firms (NTBFs) and non-innovative firm foundations. Based on theoretical models explaining the growth of firms, hypotheses on potential determinants are derived. The regression results indicate strong correlations between the growth rate on the one hand and firm-specific, founder-specific as well as external factors on the other. These factors influence the growth rates of innovative and non-innovative young firms in different ways. Furthermore, based on the results of multivariate regressions, NTBFs achieve on average higher growth rates than non-innovative firm foundations. Moreover, the net employment effect of those NTBFs founded in 1989/90 is positive. This does not hold for non-innovative young firms, in which the number of jobs destroyed by closures and shrinking firms is larger than the number of new jobs in growing and expanding firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H., U. Staber and C. Zimmer, 1990, 'Minimalism and Organizational Mortality: Patterns of Disbanding Among U.S. Trade Associations', 1900–1983, in J. V. Singh (ed.), Organizational Evolution, New bury Park.

  • Almus, M. and E. Nerlinger, 1998, 'Beschaeftigungsdynamik in jungen innovativen Unternehmen: Ergebnisse fuer West-Deutschland', ZEW Discussion-Paper98–09, Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., 1994, 'Business Survival and the Decision to Exit', Journal of Business Economics 1, 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., 1995a, Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., 1995b, 'Innovation, Growth and Survival', International Journal of Industrial Organization 13, 441–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndts, P. and D.-M. Harmsen, 1985, Technologieorientierte Unternehmensgruendungen in Zusammenarbeit mit staatlichen Forschungseinrichtungen, Koeln.

  • Birch, D. L., 1979,The Job Generation Process, M.I.T. Program on Neighbourhood and Regional Change, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMBF (Bundesministerium fuer Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie), 1996, Bundesbericht Forschung1996, Bonn.

  • Breheny, M. J. and R. McQuaid, 1988, 'Introduction', in M. J. Breheny and R. McQuaid (eds.), The Development of High Technology Industries: An international Survey, New York.

  • Bruederl, J., P. Preisendoerfer and A. Baumann, 1991, 'Determinanten der Ueberlebens-chancen neugegruendeter Kleinbetriebe', Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung 24, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruederl, J., P. Preisendoerfer and R. Ziegler, 1992, 'Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations', American sociological Review 57, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruederl, J., P. Preisendoerfer and R. Ziegler, 1996, Der Erfolg neugegruendeter Betriebe: Eine empirische Studie zu den Chancen und Risiken von Unternehmensgruendungen, Berlin.

  • Butchart, R. L., 1987, 'A New U.K. Definition of the High Technology Industries', Economic Trends 400, 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G., 1984, 'Organizational Ecology', Annual Review of Sociology 10, 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E., 1998, 'Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms', Journal of Economic Literature 36, 1947–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and J. G. MacKinnon, 1993, Estimation and Inference in Econometrics, New York.

  • Davis, S. J., J. Haltiwanger and S. Schuh, 1996, Job Creation and Destruction, Boston.

  • Eisenhardt, K. and C. Schoonhoven, 1990, 'Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978–1988', Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 504–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. and A. Pakes, 1995, 'Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work', Review of Economic Studies 62, 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S., 1987a, 'Test of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth', Journal of Political Economy 95, 657–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evens, D. S., 1987b, 'The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries', Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 567–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., 1990Arbeitsplatzentwicklung in Industriebetrieben, Berlin.

  • Frank, M. Z., 1988, 'An Intertemporal Model of Industrial Exit', Quarterly Journal of Economics 103, 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke, B. and H. Grupp, 1994, 'Innovationspotential und Hochtechnologie, Technologische Position Deutschlands im internationalen Wettbewerb', Schriftenreihe des Fraunhofer-Instituts fuer Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Hannover.

  • Gehrke, B. et al., 1997, Beitrag zur “Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfaehig-keit” im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums fuer Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie, Materialband, Hannover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, K. and J. Wagner, 1997, 'Analysen zur Nachfrageseite des Arbeitsmarktes mit Betriebspaneldaten aus Erhebungen der amtlichen Industriestatistik: Ein Ueberblick ueber Ansaetze und Ergebnisse fuer niedersaechsische Industriebetriebe', in J. Kuehl, M. Lahner and J. Wagner (eds.), Die Nachfrageseite des Arbeitsmarktes: 152 Matthias Almus and Eric A.Nerlinger Ergebnisse aus Analysen mit deutschen Firmenpaneldaten, Beitraege zur Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung 204, 11–82, Nuernberg.

  • Geroski, P. A., 1995, 'What Do We Know About Entry?', International Journal of Industrial Organization 13, 421–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerybadze, A., 1991, 'Marktwirtschaft und innovative Unternehmensgruendungen: Erfahrungen aus dem Modellversuch “Foerderung technologieorientierter Unternehmensgruendungen” (TOU)', in: P. Oberender, and M. E. Streit (eds.), Marktwirtschaft und Innovation, Baden-Baden, 123–157.

  • Gronau, R., 1974, 'Wage Comparisons: A Selectivity Bias', Journal of Political Economy 82, 1119–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., 1987, 'The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector', Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 583–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D. and K. Stahl, 1995, 'Unternehmens-und Beschaeftigungsdynamik in West-deutschland: Zum Einfluss von Haftungsregeln und Eigentuemerstruktur, in K. H. Oppen-laender', (ed.), Industrieoekonomik und Finanzmaerkte, ifo Studien 41, 17–50.

  • Harhoff, D. and F. Steil, 1997, 'Die ZEW-Gruendungspanels: Konzeptionelle Ueberlegungen und Analysepotential', in: D. Harhoff, (ed.), Unternehmensgruendungen-Empirische Analysen fuer die alten und neuen Bundeslaender 7, Nomos-Verlag, Baden-Baden.

  • Harhoff, D., K. Stahl and M. Woywode, 1998, 'Legal Form Growth and Exit of West-German Firms: Empirical Results for Manufacturing, Construction, Trade and Service Industries', Journal of Industrial Economics 46, 453–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J., 1974, 'Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor Supply', Econometrica 42, 679–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsdiek, D. and E. May-Strobl, 1986, Entwicklungslinien und Entwicklungsrisiken neugegruendeter Unternehmen, Schriften zur Mittelstandsforschung 9, Stuttgart.

  • Jovanovic, B., 1982, 'Selection and the Evolution of Industry', Econometrica 50, 649–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B. and G. McDonald, 1990, 'The Life Cycle of a Competitive Industry: Theory and Measurement', Journal of Political Economy 102, 322–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, R. K., 1988, 'Relation of Dominant Problems to Stages of Growth in Technology-Based New Ventures', Academy of Management Journal 31, 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulicke, M., 1987, Technologieorientierte Unternehmen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Strukturbildungs-und Wachstumsphase von Neugruendungen, Frankfurt.

  • Kulicke, M. et al., 1993, Chancen und Risiken junger Technologieunternehmen: Ergebnisse des Modellversuchs 'Foerderung technologieorientierter Unternehmens-gruendungen', Heidelberg.

  • Licht, G. and E. Nerlinger, 1997, 'New Technology-Based Firms in Germany: A Survey of the Recent Evidence', Research Policy 26, 1005–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, T., 1991, 'Does the Hazard Rate for New Plants Vary between Low-and High-Tech Industries?' Discussion Paper FS IV 91–28, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fuer Sozialforschung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A., P. Hall and A. Glasmeier, 1986, High Tech America: The What, How, Where, and Why of The Sunrise Industries, Boston.

  • Nerlinger, E., 1998, Standorte und Entwicklung junger innovativer Unternehmen: Empirische Ergebnisse fuer West-Deutschland 27, Baden-Baden.

  • North, D. and D. Smallbone, 1993, Employment Generation and Small Business Growth in Different Geographical Environment, Paper presented at the 'National Small Firms Policy and Research Conference', 17–19 November, Nottingham.

  • Oakey, R. P., 1993, 'High Technology Small Firms: A More Realistic Evaluation of Their Growth Potential', in C. Karlsson, B. Johannisson and D. J. Storey (eds.), Small Business Dynamics: International, National and Regional Perspectives, London.

  • Oakey, R. P., 1994, New Technology-based Firms in the 1990s, London.

  • Phillips, B. D., B. A. Kirchhoff and H. S. Brown, 1991, 'Formation, Growth and Mobility of Technology-based Firms in the US Economy', Entrepreneur & Regional Develoment 3, 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., U.-D. Laub and D. Schneider, 1989, Innovative Unternehmensgruendungen: Eine oekonomisch-empirische Analyse, Berlin.

  • Powell, J. L., 1994, 'Estimation of Semiparametric Models', in: R. F. Engle and D. McFadden (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, North-Holland.

  • Rees, J. and H. Stafford, 1986, 'Theories of Regional Growth and Industrial Location: Their Relevance for understanding High-Technology Complexes', in J. Rees, (ed.), Technology, Regions, and Policy, Totawa (NJ).

  • Reynolds, P. D., 1993, High Performance Entrepreneurship: What makes it Different?, Paper presented at the 'Babson Entrepreneurial Conference', University of Houston, March 24–27, Houston.

  • Roberts, E. B., 1991, Entrepreneurs in High Technology, New York.

  • Ronning, G., 1991, Mikroekonometrie, Heidelberg.

  • Scherer, F. M. and D. Ross, 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston.

  • Sternberg, R., 1988, Technologie-und Gruenderzentren als Instrument kommunaler Wirtschaftsfoerderung: Bewertung auf der Grundlage von Erhebungen in 31 Zentren und 177 Unternehmen, Dortmunder Vertrieb fuer Bau-und Planungsliteratur, Dortmund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. and A. Weiss, 1981, 'Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information', American Economic Review 71, 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L., 1965, 'Social Structure of Organizations', in J. G. March, (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago.

  • Stahl, H., 1991, 'Das Mannheimer Unternehmenspanel: Konzept und Entwicklung', Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung 28, 735–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J., 1994, Understanding the Small Business Sector, London.

  • Storey, D. J. and B. Tether, 1996, 'Review of the Empirical Knowledge and an Assessment of Statistical Data on the Economic Importance of New Technology-Based Firms in Europe', mimeo, Warwick Research Institute, Coventry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J. and B. Tether, 1997, 'Smaller Firms and Europe's High Technology Sectors: A Framework for Analysis and Some Statistical Evidence', Paper Presented at the 'Firm Dynamics and High Tech Industries-Conference, Zentrum fuer Europaeische Wirtschaftsforschung, June 9–10, Mannheim.

  • Sutton, J., 1997, 'Gibrat's Legacy', Journal of Economic Literature 35, 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Variyam, J. N. and D. S. Kraybill, 1992, 'Empirical Evidence on Determinants of Firm Growth', Economic Letters 38, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., 1992, 'Firm Size, Firm Growth, and Persistence of Chance: Testing Gibrat's Law with Establishment Data from Lower Saxony, 1978–1989', Journal of Small Business Economics 4, 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., 1994, 'Arbeitsplatzdynamik, Firmenwachstum und Betriebsgruendungen in der niedersaechsischen Industrie: Ergebnisse empirischer Untersuchungen mit Betriebsdaten', Neues Archiv fuer Niedersachsen: Zeitschrift fuer Landesforschung 1, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E., 1981, 'The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes', Journal of Economic Literature 19, 1537–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woywode, M., 1998, Determinanten der Ueberlebenswahrscheinlichkeit von Unternehmen: Eine empirische Ueberpruefung organisationstheoretischer und industrieoekonomischer Erklaerungsansaetze 25, Baden-Baden.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), P.O. Box 103443, D-68034, Mannheim, Germany

    Matthias Almus & Eric A. Nerlinger

Authors
  1. Matthias Almus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric A. Nerlinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almus, M., Nerlinger, E.A. Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: Which Factors Matter?. Small Business Economics 13, 141–154 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008138709724

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008138709724

Keywords

Search

Navigation