Landscape Ecology

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 373–382 | Cite as

Fire-driven dynamic mosaics in the Great Victoria Desert, Australia – I. Fire geometry

  • Daniel T. Haydon
  • John K. Friar
  • Eric R. Pianka


The dominant ground cover in the Great Victoria Desert is porcupine grass or spinifex, a fire-prone perennial grass that grows in hummocks or tussocks. Lightning sets hundreds of wildfires annually in inland arid Australia, generating an ever changing spatial-temporal patchwork of habitats that differ in their state of post-fire recovery. The spatial configuration of this patchwork is determined by the size, shape, frequency and inter-spatial relationships of fires, and is likely to play a vital role in the maintenance of the desert biota. Chronosequences of satellite imagery spanning the years 1972–1991 are used to extract and describe the geometry of over 800 fires from fire scars. In the imagery study area, an average of 43 fires occur annually, fire size frequency distributions are roughly log-normal with mild right skew, with average area of 28 km2, burning between 2 and 5% of the burnable landscape each year. Average fire return interval is estimated to be at least 20 years. These empirical findings are an important prerequisite for developing a more sophisticated understanding of the dynamics of the fire cycle in this ecosystem.

fire shape Great Victoria Desert habitat mosaics shape statistics succession wild fires 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allan, G.E. and Giffin, G.F. 1986. Fire ecology of the hummock grasslands of central Australia. pp. 126–129. In Proc. 4th Biennial Conference of the Australian Rangeland Society, Armidale, Australia, August 24–27, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, E.C. and Curtis, L.F. 1992. Introduction to Environmental Remote Sensing. Third edition, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  3. Burbidge, N.T. 1943. Ecological succession observed during regeneration of Triodia pungens after burning. J R Soc West Aust 28: 149–156.Google Scholar
  4. Burrows, N., Ward, B. and Robinson, A. 1991. Fire behaviour in spinifex fuels on the Gibson Desert Nature Reserve, Western Australia. J Arid Environ 20: 189–204.Google Scholar
  5. Eberhart, K.E. and Woodard, P.M. 1987. Distribution of residual vegetation associated with large fires in Alberta. Can J For Res 17: 1207–1212.Google Scholar
  6. Erdas-Imagine Version 8.2. Copyright 1995. ERDAS, Inc. Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  7. Gill, A.M., Groves, R.H. and Noble, I.R. 1981. Fire and the Australian Biota. Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  8. Gill, A.M., Burrows, N.D. and Bradstock, R.A. 1995. Firc modelling and fire weather in an Australian desert. CALMScience Suppl 4: 29–34.Google Scholar
  9. Greenslade, P. 1986. The Great Victoria Desert. Nature Conservation Society of South Australia Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Griffin, G.F. and Allan, G.E. 1984. Fire behaviour. pp. 55–68. In Anticipating the Inevitable: a Patch Burn Strategy for Fire Management at Uluru (Ayers Rock-Mt Olga) National Park. Edited by Saxon, E. CSIRO Australia, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  11. Griffin, G.F., Price N.F. and Portlock, H.F. 1983. Wildfires in the central Australian rangelands 1970–1980. J Environ Manage 17: 311–323.Google Scholar
  12. Griffin, G.F., Morton, S.R. and Allan, G.E. 1988. Fire-Created Patch-Dynamics for Conservation Management in the Hummock Grasslands of Central Australia. Proc. International Grasslands Symposium, Huhhot, China.Google Scholar
  13. Haydon, D.T., Friar, J.K. and Pianka, E.R. Fire-Driven Dynamic Mosaics in the Great Victoria Desert, Australia II: A Spatial and Temporal Landscape Model. Landscape Ecol, submitted.Google Scholar
  14. Kimber, R. 1983. Back lightning: Aborigines and fire in central Australia and the Western Desert. Archeology Oceania 18: 38–45.Google Scholar
  15. Masters, P. 1996. The effects of fire-driven succession on reptiles in spinifex grasslands at Uluru national Park, Northern Territory. Wild Res 23: 39–48.Google Scholar
  16. McAlpine, R.S. and Wotton, B.M. 1993. The use of fractal dimension to improve wildland fire perimeter predicitions. Can J for Res 23: 1073–1077.Google Scholar
  17. Pianka, E.R. 1969. Sympatry of desert lizards (Ctenotus) inWestern Australia. Ecology 50: 1012–1030.Google Scholar
  18. Pianka, E.R. 1986. Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards. Analyses of the Ecological Niche and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  19. Pianka, E.R. 1989. Desert lizard diversity: additional comments and some data. Am Nat 134: 344–364.Google Scholar
  20. Pianka, E.R. 1992. Fire Ecology. Disturbance, spatial heterogeneity, and biotic diversity: fire succession in arid Australia. Res Expl 8: 352–371.Google Scholar
  21. Pianka, E.R. 1994. Biodiversity of Australian desert lizards. pp. 259–281. In Biodiversity and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Edited by Peng C.-I. and Chou, C.H. Institute of Botany, Academica Sinica, Monograph Series No. 14Google Scholar
  22. Pianka, E.R. 1996. Long-term changes in lizard assemblages in the Great Victoria desert: Dynamic habitat mosaics in response to wildfires. pp. 191–21. In Long-Term Studies of Vertebrate Communities. Chapter 8. Edited by Cody, M.L. and Smallwood, J.A. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Pyne, S.J. 1991. Burning Bush: A Fire History of Australia. Holt.Google Scholar
  24. Ralph, W. 1984. Fire in the centre. Ecos: C.S.I.R.O. Environ Res 40: 3–10.Google Scholar
  25. Shephard, M. 1995. The Great Victoria Desert. Reed.Google Scholar
  26. Stoyan, D. and Stoyan, H. 1994. Fractals, Random Shapes and Point Fields: Methods of Geometrical Statistics. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York, p. 103.Google Scholar
  27. Wiens, J.A. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. pp. 43–60. In Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Edited by Hanski, I.A. and Gilpin, M.E. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Winkworth, R.E. 1967. The composition of several arid spinifex grasslands of central Australia in relation to rainfall, soil water relations, and nutrients. Aust J Bot 15: 107–130.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel T. Haydon
  • John K. Friar
    • 1
  • Eric R. Pianka
    • 2
  1. 1.`Widbrook'Brentwood, EssexUK
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations