Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Special diets are used to mitigate many human diseases. When these diets require changes in carbohydrate content, then sweetness becomes an important characteristic. The range of low-calorie sweeteners available to the food industry is expanding. It is essential to have an exact knowledge of the relative sweetness of various sweeteners in relation to different sucrose concentrations. The objective of this study was to determine the variation on the relative sweetness of aspartame (APM), stevia [Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni] leaf extract (SrB) and the mixture cyclamate/saccharin – two parts of cyclamate and one part of saccharin – (C/S) with the increase in their concentrations, and in neutral and acid pH in equi-sweet concentration to 10% sucrose, using magnitude estimation. Sweetness equivalence of SrB in relation to sucrose concentrations of 20% or higher and of APM and C/S to sucrose concentrations of 40% or higher could not be determined, because a bitter taste predominated. The potency of all sweeteners decreased as the level of sweetner increased. In equi-sweet concentration of sucrose at 10%, with pH 7.0 and pH 3.0, the potency was practically the same for all sweeteners evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanger LY, Lotz A, Lepeniotis S (1996) Descriptive profiles of selected high intensity sweeteners (IRS) HIS blends and sucrose. J Food Sci 61(2): 456–864.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Higginbotham JD (1982) L'état présent des aspartame. stévioside et autres édulcorants. La Sucrerie Belge 101: 235.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crosby GA (1976) New sweeteners. CRC in Food Sci Nutr Jun: 297.

  4. Homler BE (1988) In Birch CG, Lindle MG (eds), Low calorie products. London: Elsevier Applied Science.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cloningert MR, Baldwin RE (1974) L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester (aspartame) as a sweetener. J Food Sci 39: 347.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tunaley A, Thomson DMH, McEwan JA (1987) Determination of equi-sweet concentrations of nine sweeteners using a relative rating technique. Int J Food Sci Tech 22(6): 627.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Redlinger PA, Setser CS (1987) Sensory quality of selected sweeteners: aqueous and lipid model systems. J Food Sci 52: 45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wie SG, Beyts PK (1992) Sensory characteristics of sucralose and other high intensity sweeteners. J Food Sci 57(4): 1014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baldwin RE, Korschgen BM (1979) Intensification of fruit flavors by aspartame. J Food Sci 44: 938.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bakal AI, O'Brien Nabors L (1986) In O'Brien Nabors L, Gelardi RC (eds), Alternative sweeteners. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DuBois E (1981) Diterpenoid sweeteners: Syntesis and sensory evaluation of stevioside analogues nondegradable to steviol. J Med Chem 24: 1269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kinghorn AD, Soejarto DD (1985) Economic and medicinal plant research. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Soejarto DD, Kinghorn AD, Farnsworth NR (1982) Potential sweetening agents of plant origin. III. Organoleptic evaluation of stevia leaf herbarium samples for sweetness. J Nat Prod 45: 590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamaguchi S, Yoshikawa T, Ikeda S, Ninomyia T (1970) Studies on the taste of some sweet substances part I. Inter-relationships among them. Agric Biol Chem 34: 181.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ennis DM (1990) Chemical Senses 14(4): 597.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stone H, Oliver SM (1969) Measurement of the relative sweetness of selected sweeteners and sweetener mixtures. J Food Sci 34: 215.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Giovanni ME, Pangborn RM (1983) Measurement of taste intensity and degree of linking of beverages by graphic scales and magnitude estimation. J Food Sci 48: 1175.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wiseman JJ, McDaniel MR (1991) Modification of fruit flavors by aspartame and sucrose. J Food Sci 56: 1668.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moskowitz HR (1970) Ratio scales of sugar sweetness. Percep Psychoph 7(5): 315.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bartoshuk LM, Renert K, Rodin J, Stevens C (1982) Effects of temperature on the perceived sweetness of sucrose. Physiol Behav 28: 905.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hashimoto Y, Moriyasu M(1978) Determination of sweet components in Stevia rebaudiana by high-perfomance liquid chromatograph. Ultraviolet detection. Shoyakugaku Zasshi 32 (2): 209.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stevens SS (1957) On the psychophysical law. Psychol Rev 64: 153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gremby TH (1991) Intense sweeteneres for the food industry: an overview. Trends Food Sci Tech jan 1991: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Isima N, Kakayama 0 (1976) Sensory evaluation of stevioside as a sweetener. Rep Nat Food Res Inst 31: 80.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Inglett GE (ed) (1974) Symposium: Sweeteners. Westport, CT: AVI Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beck CI (1974) Sweetness, character, and applications of aspartic acid-based sweeteners. In Inglett GE (ed), Symposium: Sweeteners. Westport, CT: AVI Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harrison SK, Bernhardt RA (1984) Time-intensity sensory characteristics of sacharin, xylitol and galactose and their effect on the sweetness of lactose. J Food Sci 49: 780.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food and Nutrition, FCF-UNESP, CP 502, CEP 14801-902, Araraquara, SP, Brazil

    H.M.A.B. Cardello

  2. Department of Food Technology, FEA-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil

    M.A.P.A. Da Silva

  3. Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos –, C.S.I.C., Burjassot, Valencia, Spain

    M.H. Damasio

Authors
  1. H.M.A.B. Cardello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M.A.P.A. Da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M.H. Damasio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardello, H., Da Silva, M. & Damasio, M. Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 54, 119–129 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008134420339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008134420339

Search

Navigation