Skip to main content
Log in

State Accountancy Regulations, Audit Firm Size, and Auditor Quality: An Empirical Investigation

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends the literature on occupational licensing by examining the effect of states' licensing requirements for Certified Public Accountants (CPAs). We related variations in licensing requirements across states to CPA firm based assessments of service quality. Based upon prior research, we also examined the relationship between service quality and a market generated quality indicator: CPA firm size. The results show no association between audit quality and variations in regulatory strictness. However, a positive relationship was found between audit quality and firm size, suggesting that market forces, rather than governmental intervention, is effective in addressing the information asymmetry that can exist between CPAs and their clients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, Alan. 1984. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, George A. 1970. “The Market for 'Lemons': Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(August): 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of CPAs. 1996. The Supply Of Accounting Graduates And The Demand For Public Accounting Recruits. New York: AICPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of CPAs and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy. 1995. Uniform Accountancy Act And Uniform Accountancy Act Rules. New York: AICPA/NASBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of CPAs and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy. 1997. Final Report From The AICPA/NASBA Joint Committee On Regulation Of The Profession. New York: AICPA/NASBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Yorman. 1982. “Measurement Cost And The Organization Of Markets.” Journal of Law and Economics 25: 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrol, Sidney L., and Robert J. Gaston. 1981. “Occupational Restrictions and The Quality Of Service Received: Some Evidence.” Southern Economic Journal 47(4): 959–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, Gary, and Dennis Murray. 1998a. “The Association Between States' Educational Requirements And CPA Exam Pass Rates.” Research in Accounting Regulation 12: 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, Gary, and Dennis Murray. 1998b. “The Association Between Auditor Quality And Auditor Size: An Analysis Of Small CPA Firms.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance. 13(2): 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, Gary J., and Terrence B. O'Keefe. 1995. “Compliance with GAAS Reporting Standards: Evidence from A Positive Enforcement Program.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 14 (Fall): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. S. 1991. The LOGIT Model: An Introduction for Economists. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craswell, Allen T., Jere R. Francis, and Stephen L. Taylor. 1995. “Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specialization.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (December): 297–322.

  • Davidson, R., and D. Neu. 1993. “A Note on the Association Between Audit Firm Size And Audit Quality.” Contemporary Accounting Research 9: 479–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, Linda E. 1981. “Auditor Size and Audit Quality.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (December): 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deis, Donald R., Jr., and Gary A. Giroux. 1992. “Determinants of Audit Quality in The Public Sector.” The Accounting Review 67 (July): 462–479.

  • Fama, Eugene F., and Michael. C. Jensen. 1983. “Agency Problems and Residual Claims.” Journal of Law and Economics 26 (June): 327–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, Jere R. 1984. “The Effect of Audit Firm Size On Audit Prices: A Study of the Australian Market.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (August): 133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Management Admission Council. 1995. Profile of Graduate Admission Test Candidates: Five-Year Summary. Princeton, N.J.: GMAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael. C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs And Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October): 305–360.

  • Kleiner, Morris M., and Robert T. Kudrle, 1997. “Does Regulation Improve Outputs And Increase Prices?: The Case Of Dentistry.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper.

  • Leland, Hayne E. 1979. “Quacks, Lemons, And Licensing: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards.” Journal of Political Economy 87(December): 1328–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables In Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. 1991. “A Perspective on The Use Of Limited-Dependent And Qualitative Variables Models In Accounting Research.” The Accounting Review 66 (October): 788–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, Robert K. 1993. The Accountant's Guide to Peer and Quality Review. Westport: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Public Accountants. 1994. Synopsis of State Laws Regulating the Practice Of Public Accounting. New York: NAPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of State Boards of Accountancy. 1994. Digest Of State Accountancy Laws and State Board Regulations. New York: NASBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, Terrence B., and Peter J. Westort. 1992. “Conformance To GAAS Reporting Standards in Municipal Audits And the Economics of Auditing: The Effects of Audit Firm Size, CPA Examination Performance, and Competition.” Research in Accounting Regulation 6: 39–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna. 1986. “Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence.” Journal of Accounting Research 24 (Spring): 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna. 1988. “An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality.” The Accounting Review 63 (January): 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Carl. 1983. “Premiums for High Quality Products As Returns to Reputations.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98: 659–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Daniel T., and Jere R. Francis. 1988. “The Effects of Auditor Changes on Audit Fees: Tests of Price Cutting and Price Recovery.” The Accounting Review 63 (April): 255–269.

  • Simunic, Dan A., and Michael Stein. 1986. Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor Choice in The Market For Unseasoned New Issues. Research Monograph No. 13. Vancouver: The Canadian Certified General Accountants' Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1993. Statistical Abstracts of the United States: 1993. Washington: D.C.

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1997. 1992 Enterprise Statistics. Washington: D.C.

  • Watts, Ross L., and Jerold L. Zimmerman. 1983. “Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence.” Journal of Law and Economics 26: 613–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Ross L., and Jerold L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colbert, G., Murray, D. State Accountancy Regulations, Audit Firm Size, and Auditor Quality: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Regulatory Economics 16, 267–286 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008127022589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008127022589

Keywords

Navigation