Natural Hazards

, Volume 21, Issue 2–3, pp 331–345 | Cite as

Earthquake Hazard for the Czech Republic, Poland andSlovakia – Contribution to the ILC/IASPEI Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program

  • V. Schenk
  • Z. Schenková
  • P. Kottnauer
  • B. Guterch
  • P. Labák


The cross-bordering earthquake hazard mapfor three Central European countries, the CzechRepublic, Poland and Slovakia (CZ-PL-SK) in thesense of the Global Seismic Hazard AssessmentProgram (GSHAP) was elaborated both in terms ofmacroseismic intensities and in terms of peak groundaccelerations (PGA). A new earthquake parametriccatalogue for CZ-PL-SK (Schenková et al., 1999)allows the source regions to be delineated withrespect to tectonic structures. Regions for Austriaand Germany were taken from the D-A-CH area withsome modifications in the border zone with the CzechRepublic and Poland. Regions of other surroundingcountries were defined with respect to nationalearthquake catalogues and geologico-geophysical dataof Central European countries. For each sourceregion earthquake data were normalised to obtain areliable annual recurrence graph and the maximumexpected earthquakes. Attenuation laws were definedto allow more advanced earthquake hazard maps to becalculated by the standard probabilistic McGuire's(1976) approach. The obtained GSHAP hazard maps forthe CZ-PL-SK area were calculated for the returnperiod of 475 years. Besides a comparison with thehazard values for the D-A-CH area (Grünthal etal., 1995, 1996; Grünthal, 1997), the map wasalso compared with the effective ground accelerationmap for Austria (Lenhardt, 1996) and in both cases avery good coincidence was found.

earthquake hazard macroseismic intensity peak ground acceleration Czech Republic – Poland – Slovakia GSHAP Program 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ambraseys, N. N., Simpson, K. A., and Bommer, J. J.: 1996, Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe, Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 25, 371–400.Google Scholar
  2. Cornell, C. A.: 1968, Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 58, 1583–1606.Google Scholar
  3. Giardini, D. and Basham, P.: 1993, The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP), Annali di Geofisica 36, 3–13.Google Scholar
  4. Grünthal, G.: 1996, Earthquake hazard map for Austria, Germany and Switzerland in terms of macroseismic intensities for the return period of 475 years, Private communication, GSHAP-Regional Centre 3, Potsdam, October.Google Scholar
  5. Grünthal, G.: 1997, Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program, Summary Report, GSHAP-Regional Centre 3, Potsdam.Google Scholar
  6. Lenhardt, W.: 1996, Earthquake hazard in Austria, Proc. and Activity Report 1992–1994, XXIV ESC General Assembly, University of Athens, Athens, pp. 1499–1507.Google Scholar
  7. McGuire, R. K.: 1976, FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis, Open-File Report 76–67.Google Scholar
  8. Sabetta, F. and Pugliese, A.: 1996, Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 337–352.Google Scholar
  9. Schenk, V.: 1983, On the problem of time-normalization of the magnitude-frequency relation, Ann. Geoph. 1, 439–442.Google Scholar
  10. Schenk, V.: 1988, Earthquake hazard calculation (in Czech), DrSc Thesis, Geophys. Inst., Czechosl. Acad. Sci.Google Scholar
  11. Schenk V. and Kottnauer P.: 1991, Probabilistic methods in maximum earthquake assessment, In: G. W. Borm (ed.), Proc. 5th Intern. Conf. on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Computational Mechanics Publications 110, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  12. Schenk, V., Schenková, Z., and Kottnauer P.: 1997, Categorisation and harmonisation of probabilistic earthquake hazard assessments with respect to statistic representation of input data, Natural Hazards 15, 121–137.Google Scholar
  13. Schenk, V., Schenková, Z., Kottnauer P., Guterch, B., and Labák, P.: 1996, Earthquake hazard assessment for the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia, Abstracts, XXV ESC General Assembly, Reykjavík, F1.07, p. 81.Google Scholar
  14. Schenk, V., Schenková, Z., Kottnauer P., Guterch, B., and Labák, P.: 1998, Earthquake hazard for the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia. Contribution to the Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program, Abstracts and Programme, 7th International Conference on Natural and Man-Made Hazards, Chania, p. 134.Google Scholar
  15. Schenk, V., Schenková, Z., Mantlík, F., Kottnauer, P., and Grünthal, G.: 1989, Seismic hazard assessment for Central Europe-version 1989, In: V. Schenk and Z. Schenková (eds), Proc. of the Inter. Symp. on the Analysis of Seismicity and Seismic Risk, Bechyně Castle, Czechoslovakia, September 4–9, 1989, Geophys. Inst., Czechosl. Acad. Sci., Prague, pp. 494–503.Google Scholar
  16. Schenková, Z., Schenk, V., Kottnauer P., Guterch, B., and Labák, P.: 1997, GSHAP earthquake hazard map for the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia, Abstracts, 29th IASPEI General Assembly, Thessaloniki, p. 385.Google Scholar
  17. Schenková, Z., Schenk, V., Kottnauer P., Guterch, B., and Labák, P.: 1998, Final version of the GSHAP map for the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia, Abstracts, XXVI ESC General Assembly, Tel Aviv, F2.01, p. 50.Google Scholar
  18. Schenková, Z., Schenk, V., Kottnauer, P., Guterch, B., and Labák, P.: 1999, Earthquake catalogue for the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia, manuscript prepared for Acta Montana, Series A. Google Scholar
  19. Spudisch, P., Fletcher, J. B., Hellweg, M., Boatwright, J., Sullivan, C., Joyner, W. B., Hanks, T. C., Boore, D. M., McGarr, A., Baker, L., and Lindth, A. G.: 1997, SEA96-A new predictive relation for earthquake ground motions in extensional tectonic regimes, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 190–198.Google Scholar
  20. Stucchi, M.: 1994, Recommendations for the compilation of a European parametric earthquake catalogue, In: P. Albini and A. Moroni (eds), Materials of the CEC project “Review of Historical Seismicity in Europe” CNR, IRRS Milano, 2, pp. 181–190.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Schenk
    • 1
  • Z. Schenková
  • P. Kottnauer
  • B. Guterch
    • 2
  • P. Labák
    • 3
  1. 1.Acad. Sci.Institute of Rock Structure and MechanicsPrague 8The Czech Republic
  2. 2.Polish Acad. Sci.Institute of GeophysicsWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Slovak Acad. Sci.Geophysical InstituteBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations