Advertisement

Student Surveys for School Teacher Evaluation

  • Kenneth D. Peterson
  • Christine Wahlquist
  • Kathie Bone
Article

Abstract

Student's reports have the potential to add much useful information about school teacher quality. However, much research has centered on post secondary settings and many questions remain about the use of pupil surveys for K–12 teachers. The Davis County School District (Utah) uses pupil surveys as one teacher-chosen data source for teacher evaluation. The surveys of 9,765 students were analyzed for patterns of response. Item analysis suggests that pupils responded with reliability and validity. Some individual items are more defensible than others for conceptual and empirical reasons.

Keywords

School District School Teacher Individual Item Teacher Evaluation Item Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleamoni, L.M. (1981). Student ratings of instruction. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 110-145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Aleamoni, L.M. (1987). Student rating myths versus research facts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 111-119.Google Scholar
  3. Aleamoni, L.M. (1999). Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 153-166.Google Scholar
  4. Cangelosi, J.S. (1991). Evaluating classroom instruction. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Centra, J.A. (1975). Colleagues as raters of classroom instruction. Journal of Higher Education, 46, 327-337.Google Scholar
  6. Cook, M.A., & Richards, H.C. (1972). Dimensions of principal and supervisor ratings of teacher behavior. Journal of Experimental Education, 41(2), 11-14.Google Scholar
  7. Drake, T.L. & Roe, W.H. (1994). The principalship. (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan College Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Dwyer, C.A. (1995). Criteria for performance-based teacher assessments: Validity, standards, and issues. In A.J. Shinkfield & D. Stufflebeam (eds.), Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice (pp. 62-80). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Educational Research Service (1988). Teacher evaluation: Practices and procedures. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.Google Scholar
  10. Ellett, C.D. (1987). Emerging teacher performance assessment practices: Implications for the instructional supervision role of school principals. In W. Greenfield (Ed.), Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies (pp. 302-327). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  11. Epstein, J.L. (1985). A question of merit: Principals' and parents' evaluations of teachers. Educational Researcher, 14(7), 3-8.Google Scholar
  12. Glass, G.V. (1974). A review of three methods of determining teacher effectiveness. In H.J. Walberg (Ed.), Evaluating educational performance (pp. 11-32). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, S.M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jordan School District (1995). Jordan Performance Appraisal System. Sandy, UT: Jordan School District, Utah.Google Scholar
  16. Kauchak, D., Peterson, K., & Driscoll, A. (1985). An interview study of teachers' attitudes toward teacher evaluation practices. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19(1), 32-37.Google Scholar
  17. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Loup, K., Garland, J., Ellett, C., & Rugutt, J. (1996). Ten years later: Findings from a replication of a study of teacher evaluation practices in our 100 largest school districts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10, 203-226.Google Scholar
  19. McCoy, M.T. (1998). Reasons for teacher evaluation. Education Law Association, Spring Conference, Snowbird, Utah, March 24, p. 24.Google Scholar
  20. McGreal, T.L. (1983). Successful teacher evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  21. Millman, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (Eds.) (1990). The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Ostrander, L.P. (1995). Multiple judges of teacher effectiveness: Comparing teacher self-assessments with the perceptions of principals, students, and parents. Doctoral dissertation. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
  23. Peterson, K., Gunne, M., Miller, P., & Rivera, O. (1984). Multiple audience rating form strategies for student evaluation of college teaching. Research in Higher Education, 20, 309-321.Google Scholar
  24. Peterson, K.D. (1987). Teacher evaluation with multiple and variable lines of evidence. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 311-317.Google Scholar
  25. Peterson, K.D. (1989). Costs of school teacher evaluation in a career ladder system. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22(2), 30-36.Google Scholar
  26. Peterson, K.D. (2000). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  27. Peterson, K.D., & Chenoweth, T. (1992). School teachers' control and involvement in their own evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 6, 177-189.Google Scholar
  28. Peterson, K.D., & Stevens, D. (1988). Student reports for schoolteacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 259-267.Google Scholar
  29. Peterson, K.D., Stevens, D., & Driscoll, A. (1990). Primary grade student reports for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 165-173.Google Scholar
  30. Scriven, M. (1988). Duty-based teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 319-334.Google Scholar
  31. Shinkfield, A.J., & Stufflebeam, D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Stronge, J., & Ostrander, L. (1997). Client surveys in teacher evaluation. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 129-161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  33. Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  34. Wolf, R. (1973). How teachers feel toward evaluation. In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 156-168). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth D. Peterson
    • 1
  • Christine Wahlquist
    • 2
  • Kathie Bone
    • 2
  1. 1.Portland State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Davis School DistrictFarmington

Personalised recommendations