Abstract
Merging utilities are frequently required to share the economic benefits of a merger with ratepayers. These benefits are often measured using stock price movements at the time of the merger announcement. While event studies of this sort can be a powerful and appropriate tool, improper application and interpretation can lead to misleading conclusions. In this paper, we review the basic event study approach to merger evaluation and discuss some of the complicating factors. We describe both flawed and correctly done event studies submitted in the merger application of SBC Communications and Pacific Telesis and some additional case studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bradley, M., A. Desai, and E. Kim 1983. “The Rationale Behind Interfirm Tender Offers: Information or Synergy?” Journal of Financial Economics 11: 183–206.
Brealey, Richard A., and Stewart C. Myers 1995. Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. New York: McGraw Hill.
Cornell, Bradford, and R. Gregory Morgan 1990. “Using Finance Theory to Measure Damages in Fraud in the Market Cases.” UCLA Law Review 37: 883–912.
Dickey, Jonathan C., and Marcia Kramer Mayer 1996. “Effect on 10b-5 Damages of the 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act: A Forward-Looking Assessment.” Business Lawyer 51 (August).
Eckbo, B. Espen 1983. “Horizontal Mergers, Collusion, and Stockholder Wealth.” Journal of Financial Economics 11: 241–273.
Fama, Eugene F. 1965. “The Behaviour of Stock Market Prices.” Journal of Business 38: 34–105.
Fama, Eugene F., Lawrence Fisher, Michael Jensen, and Richard Roll 1969. “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information.” International Economic Review 10(1): 1–21.
Giaccotto, C., and Sfiridis, J. 1996. “Hypothesis Testing in Event Studies: The Case of Variance Changes.” Journal of Economics and Business 48: 349–370.
Gibson, Ronald J., and Bernard S. Black. 1995. The Law and Finance of Corporate Acquisitions. Foundation Press, 2d edition.
Joskow, P., and N. L. Rose. 1989. “Effects of Economic Regulation.” Handbook of Industrial Organization 2: 1450–1506.
Keim, D.B. 1986. “The CAPM and Equity Return Regularities.” Financial Analysts Journal 42: 19–34.
Malkiel, Burton G. 1987. “Efficient Market Hypothesis.” In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: MacMillan Press.
McLaughlin, Robert H., and H. Mehran 1995. “Regulation and the Market for Corporate Control: Hostile Tender Offers for Electric and Gas Utilities.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 8: 181–204.
McGuckin, Robert H., Peter Waldstein, and Frederick R. Warren-Boulton 1992. “The Use of Stock Market Returns in Antitrust Analysis of Mergers.” Review of Industrial Organization 7: 1–11.
Roberts, H. 1967. “Statistical versus Clinical Prediction of the Stock Market.” Unpublished manuscript. University of Chicago: Center for Research on Securities Prices.
Rose, N. L. 1985. “The Incidence of Regulatory Rents in the Trucking Industry.” Rand Journal of Economics 16: 299, 318.
Werden, G.J., and M.A. Williams. 1989. “The Role of Stock Market Studies in Formulating Antitrust Policy Towards Horizontal Mergers.” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 28: 3–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, A.J., Portes, J. Mergers in Regulated Industries: the Uses and Abuses of Event Studies. Journal of Regulatory Economics 14, 281–304 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008087424850
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008087424850