Marketing Letters

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 113–124 | Cite as

The Effect of Implicit versus Explicit Comparisons on Temporal Pricing Claims

  • John T. Gourville

Abstract

Existing research has investigated the "pennies-a-day" strategy of reframing an "aggregate" expense as a "per day" expense (Nagle & Holden, 1995; Price 1995; Gourville 1998). This paper extends this research by considering the incremental impact on compliance of explicitly comparing the cost of a transaction to a specific petty cash expense (e.g., a cup of coffee). We show that in the presence of a ‘per day’ framing of price (e.g., $1 per day), an explicit comparison provides little added value. However, we also show that in the presence of an ‘aggregate’ framing of price (e.g., $350), an explicit comparison to a petty cash expense is sufficient to generate a "pennies-a-day" perspective. We conclude that it is not the ‘per day’ framing, per se, which drives "pennies-a-day" effectiveness, but the petty cash comparisons that such a framing either implicitly or explicitly generates.

Pennies-a-day strategy pricing temporal framing consumer choice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dodds, William B., Kent B. Monroe and Dhruv Grewal. (1991). “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research 28 (August), 307–319.Google Scholar
  2. Gourville, John T. (1998). “Pennies-a-Day: The Effect of Temporal Reframing on Transaction Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research 24 (March), 395–408.Google Scholar
  3. Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe and R. Krishnan. (1998). “The Effects of Price Comparison Advertising on Buyer's Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing 62(2), 46–59.Google Scholar
  4. Kahneman, Daniel and Dale T. Miller. (1986). “Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to its Alternatives,” Psychological Review 93, 136–153.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, Michael D. (1984). “Consumer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable Alternatives,” Journal of Consumer Research 11 (December), 741–753.Google Scholar
  6. Nagle, Thomas T. and Reed K. Holden. (1995). The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing, 2nd Ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Payne, John W., James R. Bettman and Eric J. Johnson. (1993). The Adaptive Decision Maker, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Price, Paul C. (1994). “Installment Framing: The Mental Aggregation and Disaggregation of Monetary Cost Over Time,” poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, St. Louis, MO, November 13, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. Rosch, Eleanor and Carolyn Mervis. (1975). “Family Resemblences: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories,” Cognitive Psychology 7 (October), 573–605.Google Scholar
  10. Schwarz, Norbert and Herbert Bless. (1992). “Constructing Reality and Its Alternatives: An Inclusion/Exclusion Model of Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Social Judgment,” in Leonard L. Martin and Abraham Tesser (eds.) The Construction of Social Judgments; Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Thaler, Richard H. (1985). “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science 4(3), 199–214.Google Scholar
  12. Tversky, Amos. (1977). “Features of Similarity,” Psychological Review 84(4), 327–352.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • John T. Gourville
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Business AdministrationHarvard UniversityBoston

Personalised recommendations