Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children

Abstract

Young children's reading comprehension skill is associated with their ability to draw inferences (Oakhill 1982, 1984). An experiment was conducted to investigate the direction of this relation and to explore possible sources of inferential failure. Three groups of children participated: Same-age skilled and less skilled comprehenders, and a comprehension-age match group. The pattern of performance indicated that the ability to make inferences was not a by-product of good reading comprehension, rather that good inference skills are a plausible cause of good reading comprehension ability. Failure to make inferences could not be attributed to lack of relevant general knowledge. Instead, the pattern of errors indicated that differences in reading strategy were the most likely source of these group differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Baker, L. & Stein, N. (1981). The development of prose comprehension skills. In: C. M. Santa & B. L. Hayes (eds.), Children's prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 7–43). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. (1996). The nature of the relation between comprehension skill and the ability to tell a story, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 14: 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V. & Bryant, P. E. (2000). Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12(2000), forthcoming.

  4. Casteel,M. A. & Simpson, G. B. (1991). Textual coherence and the development of inferential generation skills, Journal of Research in Reading 14: 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C. & Pintillie, D. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale. NFER-Nelson.

  6. Garner, R. & Kraus, C. (1981–1982). Good and poor comprehender differences in knowing and regulating reading behaviors, Educational Research Quarterly 6(4): 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garnham, A. (1985). Psycholinguistics: Central topics. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garnham, A. & Oakhill, J. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In: B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 313–339). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gates, A. I. & MacGinitie, W. H. (1965). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. New York: Columbia University Teachers' College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M. & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension, Psychological Review 101: 371–395.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd edn. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J. & Seely, M. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing, Journal of Experimental Psychology 20: 1245–1470.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J. & Seely, M. R. (1997). Individual differences in readers' sentenceand text-level representations, Journal of Memory and Language 36: 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Neale, M. D. (1989). The Neale analysis of reading ability-revised British edition. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oakhill, J. V. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders' memory for sentences, British Journal of Psychology 73: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oakhill, J. V. (1983). Instantiation in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35A: 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oakhill, J. V. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories, British Journal of Educational Psychology 54: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Omanson, R. C., Warren, W. M. & Trabasso, T. (1978). Goals, inferential comprehension and recall of stories by children, Discourse Processes 1: 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paris, S. G. & Lindauer, B. K. (1976). The role of inference in children's comprehension and memory for sentence, Cognitive Psychology 8: 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paris, S. G. & Upton, L. R. (1976). Children's memory for inferential relations in prose, Child Development 47: 660–668.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In: M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479–515). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stothard, S. E. & Hulme, C. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children: The role of language comprehension and working memory skills, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4: 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In: M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539–588). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yuill, N. & Joscelyne, T. (1988). Effect of organisational cues and strategies on good and poor comprehenders' story understanding, Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 152–158.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yuill, N. M. & Oakhill, J. V. (1988). Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension, Applied Cognitive Psychology 2: 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension.An experimental investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cain, K., Oakhill, J.V. Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing 11, 489–503 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205

Download citation

  • Causal relations
  • General knowledge
  • Inference making ability
  • Reading comprehension
  • Young children