Skip to main content
Log in

Competency Pay for Professionals and Managers in Business: A Review and Implications for Teachers

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes the use of a form of pay for knowledge and skills used for professional workers in the private sector known as competency-based pay. The definition of competencies, their assessment, and their link to pay are discussed, along with the relation of competencies to organizational performance and human resource management strategy. The relatively small amount of existing empirical research is reviewed, and two case studies of the use of competency-based pay are presented. The article concludes by summarizing lessons for education from private-sector experience, which include the need to link the competencies paid for to the capabilities the organization needs to fulfill its mission, the importance of measuring competencies in behavioral and observable terms, and the need to integrate competencies into all phases of the human resources management process, including staffing and development as well as compensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Compensation Association (1996). Raising the Bar. Scottsdale, AZ: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, R.A., Levine, E.L., & Sistrunk, F. (1983). The role of jobs and job-based methods in personnel and human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 1, 45–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11, 656–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, W.C., & Brush, D.H. (1993). More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements. Human Performance, 6, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., & Sager, C.E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman (eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capelli, P., & Crocker-Hefter, A. (1996). Distinctive human resources are firms' core competencies. Organizational Dynamics (Winter), 7–22.

  • Cofsky, K.M. (1993). Critical keys to competency-based pay. Compensation and Benefits Review (November-December), 46–52.

  • Cohen, D., & Heneman, R.L. (1994). Ability and effort weights in pay level and pay increase decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 8, 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, S., & Odden A. (1995). Linking teacher compensation to teacher career development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.S., & Holley, W.H. (1982). The relationship of performance appraisal characteristics to verdicts in selected employment discrimination cases. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 392–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finegold, D., Lawler, E.E., III, & Ledford, G.E., Jr. (In press). Competencies, capabilities, and strategic organization design. In S.A. Mohrman, J. Galbraith & E.E. Lawler III (eds.), Tomorrow's organization: Creating winning competencies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Flanagan, J.L. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B.A., & Cornelius, E.T. III (1976). Effect of rater participation in scale construction on the psychometric characteristics of two rating scale formats, Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 210–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, N., Ledford, G.E., Jr., Jenkins, G.D., Jr., & Doty, D.H. (1992). Survey-based prescriptions for skillbased pay. ACA Journal, 1(1), 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, R.L. (1986). The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 811–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, R.L. (1992). Merit pay: Linking pay to performance ratings. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, R.L., & Thomas, A.L. (1997). The Limited, Inc.: Using strategic performance to drive brand leadership. Compensation and Benefits Review, 27(6), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, R.L., & von Hippel, C. (1996). The assessment of job performance: Focusing attention on context, process, and group issues. In D. Lewin, D.J.B. Mitchell & M.A. Zaidi (eds.), Handbook of human resource management (pp. 587–617). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofrichter, D.A., & Spencer, L.M., Jr. (1996). Competencies: The right foundation for effective human resource management. Compensation and Benefits Review (November-December), 20–26.

  • Jenkins, G.D., Jr., Ledford, G.E., Jr., Gupta, N., & Doty, D.H. (1992). Skill-based pay: Practices, payoffs, pitfalls, and prospects. Scottsdale, AZ: American Compensation Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). The personnel evaluation standards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, C. (1997). Teacher compensation and organization. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A.A., & Wilson, M.L. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19, 699–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G.P., & Wexley, K.N. (1994). Increasing through performance appraisal (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E.E., III. (1994). From job-based to competency-based organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E.E., III. (1996). Competencies: A poor foundation for the new pay. Compensation and Benefits Review (November-December), 20–26.

  • Lawler, E.E., III, & Ledford, G.E., Jr. (1992). A skill-based approach to human resource management. European Management Journal, 10, 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, P. (1997). Mass customization: A reward mosaic for the future? ACA Journal, Spring, 16–31.

  • Ledford, G.E., Jr. (1995a). Designing nimble reward systems. Compensation and Benefits Review, 27(4), 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, G.E., Jr. (1995b). Paying for the skills, knowledge, and competencies of knowledge workers. Compensation and Benefits Review, 27(4), 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, G.E., Jr., & Bergel, G. (1991). Skill-based pay case number 1: General Mills. Compensation and Benefits Review, 23(2), 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, G.E., Jr., Tyler, W.R., & Dixey, W.B. (1991). Skill-based pay case number 3: Honeywell ammunition assembly plant. Compensation and Benefits Review, 23(2), 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longnecker, C.O., Sims, H.P., & Gioia, D.A. (1987). Beyond the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorant, R., (1992, June 27). Mechanic sues Sears for firing. Wisconsin State Journal. p. B1.

  • Marino, K.E. (1996). Developing consensus on firm competencies and capabilities. Academy of Management Executive, 10, 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mericle, K., & Kim, D. (1996). Assessing correlates of pay satisfaction and skill acquisition under skill-based pay systems. Unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin.

  • Mohrman, A.M., Mohrman, S.A., & Odden, A.R. (1996). Aligning teacher compensation with systematic school reform: Skill-based pay and group-based pay performance rewards. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B., & Gerhart, B. (1997). An empirical analysis of a skill-based pay program and changes in organizational outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at San Antonio.

  • Norris, F. (1991, November 12). Look out for number one. New York Times, pp. A1, C5.

  • Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (1997). Paying teachers for what they know and do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review (May-June), 79–91.

  • Sibson & Co. (1997). Why link competencies to pay. Raleigh, NC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, S.B., & Wexley, K.N. (1984). Reactions of employees to performance appraisal interviews as a function of their participation in scale development, Personnel Psychology, 37, 703–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L.M., Jr. & Spencer, S.M. (1993). Competence at work. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G.M., McCall, M.W., Jr., & Mahoney, (1977). Early identification of international executive potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, S.A., & Cofsky, K.M. (1994). Competency-based pay on a banding platform. American Compensation Association Journal (Spring), 30–45.

  • Werner, J.M., & Bolino, M.L. (1997). Explaining U.S. Court of Appeals decisions involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness, and validation. Personnel Psychology, 50, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zingheim, P., Ledford, G.E., Jr., & Schuster, J. (1996). Competencies and competency models: One size fits all? ACA Journal, 5(1), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heneman, R.L., Ledford, G.E. Competency Pay for Professionals and Managers in Business: A Review and Implications for Teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 12, 103–121 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008076926413

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008076926413

Keywords

Navigation