Abstract
Two methods widely used in agrometeorogical simulation models for describing field soil water regimes are compared and evaluated based on their ability to predict experimental data from a single field study. The first method is based on a numerical solution to the Richards' equation for describing water movement in the soil profile, while the second method is based on soil-water capacity terms. The evaluation of the performance of the two methods is based on goodness-of-fit statistics and graphical analysis. Results indicate that the first method is more accurate for both the upper and the lower soil zones; the second method, despite its low performance in the upper soil zone can adequately describe soil moisture conditions in the lower soil zones. Recommendations are made for model use based on comparison results, the intended model use, and the difficulty in the acquisition of required model inputs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambrose, R. B. and Roesch, S. E.: 1982, Dynamic Estuary Model Performance, J. of Environ. Engin. Div. ASCE 108(EE1), 51–71.
Baier, W. and Robertson, G. W.: 1986, A new versatile soil moisture budget, Can. J. Plant Sci. 46, 299–315.
Belmans, C.: 1985, SWATRER Reference Manual, Laboratory of Soil and Water Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 114 pp.
Belmans, C., Wesseling, J. G. and Feddes, R. A.: 1983, Simulation model of the water balance of a cropped soil, J. Hydrol. 63, 271–286.
Carsel, R. F., Mulkey, L. A., Lorber, M. N. and Baskin, L. B.: 1985, The pesticide root zone model (PRZM): A procedure for evaluating pesticide leaching threats to ground water, Ecol. Modelling 30, 49–69.
Elmaloglou, S.: 1992, Contribution to the Mathematical Simulation of the Water Balance in Soil Covered by Prairie, in Proceedings of the Hellenic Hydrotechnical Association Symposium, November 1992, Larisa, Greece, pp. 3–10.
Feddes, R. A., Kowalik, P. J. and Zaradny, H.: 1978, Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Simulation Monograph, PUDOC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 189 pp.
Fitzpartick, E. A. and Nix, H. A.: 1969, A model for simulating soil water regime in alternating fallow-crop systems, Agric. Meteorol. 6, 303–319.
Haverkamp, R., Vauclin, M., Touma, J., Wierenga, P. J. and Vachaud, G.: 1977, A comparison of numerical simulation models for one-dimensional infiltration, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 41, 285–294.
Jansson, P.-E.: 1991, Soil water and heat model, Technical description, Swedish University of Agric. Sciences, Div. of Hydrotechnics, Report No. 165, Upssala, 72 pp.
Jansson, P.-E. and Halldin, S.: 1979, Model for the Annual Water and Heat Flow in a Layered Soil, in S. Halldin (ed.), Comparison of Forest and Energy Exchange Models, Int. Soc. For. Ecol. Modelling, Copenhagen, pp. 145–163.
Leonard, R. A., Knisel, W. G. and Still, D. A.: 1987, Groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems, Trans. ASAE 30(5), 1403–1418.
Lhomme, J. P. and Katerji, N.: 1991, A simple modelling of crop water balance for agrometeorological applications, Ecol. Modelling 57, 11–25.
Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J.: 1972, On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Monthly Weather Review 100, 81–92.
Wagenet, R. J. and Hutson, J. L.: 1989, Leaching estimation and chemistry model, Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
World Meteorological Organization: 1975, Intercomparison of conceptual models used in operational hydrological forecasting, Operational Hydrol, Report No. 7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsiros, J.X., Elmaloglou, S. & Ambrose, R.B. A Comparative Study of Two Methods for Modeling Soil Water Regime in Agricultural Fields. Water Resources Management 12, 285–293 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008073824019
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008073824019