Landscape Ecology

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 263–268 | Cite as

Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient

  • James P. Gibbs
Article

Abstract

Understanding how changes in land-use affect the distribution and abundance of organisms is an increasingly important question in landscape ecology. Amphibians may be especially prone to local extinction resulting from human-caused transformation and fragmentation of their habitats owing to the spatially and temporally dynamic nature of their populations. In this study, distributions of five species of woodland amphibians with differing life histories were surveyed along a 10 km, spatially continuous gradient of forest fragmentation in southern Connecticut, U.S.A. Redback salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) and northern spring peepers (Pseudacris c. crucifer) occupied available habitat along the gradient's length. Wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) and spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) were absent from portions of the gradient where forest cover was reduced to below about 30%. Red-spotted newts (Notophthalmus v. viridescens) did not persist below a forest cover threshold of about 50%. Correlations between species' biological traits and their fragmentation tolerance imply that low density, population variability, and high mobility coupled with restricted habitat needs predispose woodland amphibians to local extinction caused by habitat fragmentation. These patterns are in contrast to the widely held notion that populations of the best dispersers are those most tolerant of habitat fragmentation.

amphibians fragmentation disturbance salamanders frogs Plethodon cinereus Ambystoma maculatum Notophthalmus v. viridescens Pseudacris c. crucifer Rana sylvatica 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355–366.Google Scholar
  2. Berven, K.A. 1990. Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71: 1599–1608.Google Scholar
  3. Berven, K.A. and Grudzien, T.A. 1990. Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44: 2047–2056.Google Scholar
  4. Blair, R.B. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6: 506–519.Google Scholar
  5. Blaustein, A.R., D.B. Wake and W.P. Sousa. 1994. Amphibian declines: judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions. Cons. Biol. 8: 60–71.Google Scholar
  6. Bolger, D.T., A.C. Alberts and M.E. Soulé. 1991. Occurrence patterns of bird species in habitat fragments: sampling, extinction, and nested species subsets. Am. Nat. 137: 155–156.Google Scholar
  7. Brodie, E.D. 1968. Investigations on the skin toxin of the redspotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens viridescens. Am.Midl. Nat. 80: 276–280.Google Scholar
  8. Burgman, M.A., Ferson, S. and Akçakaya, H.R. 1993. Risk assessment in conservation biology. Chapman Hall, London.Google Scholar
  9. Burton, T.M. and G.E. Likens. 1975. Salamander populations and biomass in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Copeia 1975: 541–546.Google Scholar
  10. Cooke, A.S. 1988. Mortality of toads (Bufo bufo) on roads near a Cambridgeshire breeding site. Brit. Herpetol. Soc. 26: 29–30.Google Scholar
  11. DeGraaf, R.M. and D.D. Rudis. 1990. Herpetofaunal species composition and relative abundance among three New England forest types. For. Ecol. Manage. 32: 155–165.Google Scholar
  12. Eastman, J.R. 1992. IDRISI. Clark University, Graduate School of Geography, Worcester, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. Fahrig, L. and G. Merriam. 1994. Conservation of fragmented populations. Cons. Biol. 8: 50–59.Google Scholar
  14. Fahrig, L., J.H. Pedlar, S.E. Pope, P.D. Taylor and J.F. Wegner. 1995. Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biological Conservation 73: 177–182.Google Scholar
  15. Forman, R.T.T. and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Gascon, C. 1991. Population-and community-level analysis of species occurrences of central Amazonian rainforest tadpoles. Ecology 72: 1731–1746.Google Scholar
  17. Gill, D.E. 1978. The metapopulation ecology of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque). Ecol. Mono. 48: 145–166.Google Scholar
  18. Heatwole, H. 1962. Environmental factors influencing local distribution and activity of the salamander, Plethodon cinereus. Ecology 43: 460–472.Google Scholar
  19. Kareiva, P. and U. Wennergren. 1995. Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373: 299–302.Google Scholar
  20. Klemens, M.W. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles of Connecticut and adjacent regions. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut Bulletin 112.Google Scholar
  21. Laan, R. and B. Verboom. 1990. Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biol. Conserv. 54: 251–262.Google Scholar
  22. Lubchenko, J., Olson, A.M., Brubaker, L.B., Carpenter, S.R., Holland, M.M., Hubbell, S.P., Levin, S.A., MacMahon, J.A., Matson, P.A., Melillo, J.M., Mooney, H.A., Peterson, C.H., Pulliam, H.R., Real, L.A., Regal, P.J. and Risser, P.G. 1991. The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology 72: 371–412.Google Scholar
  23. McCarthy, M.A., D.B. Lindenmayer and M. Drechsler. 1997. Extinction debts and risks faced by abundant species. Conservation Biology 11: 221–226.Google Scholar
  24. Monmonier, M.S. 1974. Measures of pattern complexity for chloropleth maps. The American Cartographer 2: 159–169.Google Scholar
  25. Opdam, P., Van Apeldoorn, R., Schotman, A. and Kalkhoven, J. 1993. Population responses to landscape fragmentation. pp. 147–171 In Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment. Edited by C.C. Vos and P. Opdam. Chapman Hall, London.Google Scholar
  26. Pechmann, J.H.K., D.E. Scott, R.D. Semlitsch, J.P. Caldwell, L.J. Vitt and J.W. Gibbons. 1991. Declining amphibian populations: the problem of separating human impacts from natural fluctuations. Science 253: 892–894.Google Scholar
  27. Sjogren, P. 1991. Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42: 135–147.Google Scholar
  28. van Gelder, J.J. 1973. A quantitative approach to the mortality resulting from traffic in a population of Bufo bufo L. Oecologia 13: 93–95.Google Scholar
  29. Whitcomb, R.F., Robbins, C.F., Lynch, J.F., Whitcomb, B.L., Klimkiewicz, M.K. and Bystrak, D. 1981. Effects of forest fragmentation on the avifauna of eastern deciduous forest. pp. 125–205. In Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes. Edited by R.L. Burgess and D. Sharpe. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Wilbur, H.M. 1980. Complex life cycles. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 67–93.Google Scholar
  31. Wyman, R.L. 1990. Multiple threats to wildlife: climate change, acid precipitation and habitat fragmentation. pp. 134–155. In Global Climate Change and Life on Earth. Edited by R.L. Wyman. Routledge, Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Wyman, R.L. and Hawksley-Lescault, D. 1987. Soil acidity affects distributions, behavior, and physiology of the salamander Plethodon cinereus. Ecology 68: 1819–1827.Google Scholar
  33. Yahner, R.H. 1988. Changes in wildlife communities near edges. Cons. Biol. 2: 333–339.Google Scholar
  34. Zimmerman, B.L. and Bierregaard, R.O. 1986. Relevance of the equilibrium theory of island biogeography with an example from Amazonia. J. Biogeography 13: 133–143.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • James P. Gibbs
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations