Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Molecular Similarity Index Analysis (CoMSIA) to study hydrogen-bonding properties and to score combinatorial libraries

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparative molecular field analysis has been applied to a data set of thermolysin inhibitors. Fields expressed in terms of molecular similarity indices (CoMSIA) have been used instead of the usually applied Lennard-Jones- and Coulomb-type potentials (CoMFA). Five different properties, assumed to cover the major contributions responsible for ligand binding, have been considered: steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen-bond donor or acceptor properties. The statistical evaluation of the field properties by PLS analysis reveals a similar predictive potential to CoMFA. However, significantly improved and easily interpretable contour maps are obtained. The features in these maps intuitively suggest where to modify a molecular structure in terms of physicochemical properties and functional groups in order to improve its binding affinity. They can also be interpreted with respect to the known structural protein environment of thermolysin. Most of the highlighted regions in the maps are mirrored by features in the surrounding environment required for binding. Using the derived correlation model, different members of a combinatorial library designed for thermolysin inhibition have been scored for affinity. The results obtained demonstrate the prediction power of the CoMSIA method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Müller, K., Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 3 (1995) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cramer III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thibaut, U., In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, pp. 661–696.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klebe, G., Abraham, U. and Mietzner, T., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 4130.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Folkers, G., Merz, A. and Rognan, D., In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, pp. 583–618.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stahle, L. and Wold, S., Prog. Med. Chem., 25 (1988) 292.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cramer III, R.D., De Priest, S.A., Patterson, D.E. and Hecht, P., In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, pp. 443–485.

    Google Scholar 

  8. DePriest, S.A., Mayer, D.C.B. and Marshall, G.R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115 (1993) 5372.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, D.A., Bermate, J.C., Burkoth, T.S. and Patel, D.V., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117 (1995) 5381.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martin, Y.C., Bures, M.G., Danaher, E.A., De Lazzer, J., Lico, I. and Pavlik, P., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7 (1993) 83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Program DISCO is available from Tripos Ass., St. Louis, MO, USA.

  12. Allen, F.H., Kennard, O. and Taylor, R., Acc. Chem. Res., 16 (1983) 146.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klebe, G., J. Mol. Biol., 237 (1994) 212.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dewar, M.J.S., Zoebisch, E.G., Healy, E.F. and Stewart, J.J.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107 (1985) 3902.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K., Revankar, G.R. and Robins, R.K., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29 (1989) 163.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sybyl Molecular Modeling System (Version 6.1), Tripos Ass., St. Louis,MO, USA.

  17. Kearsley, S.K. and Smith, G.M., Tetrahed. Comput. Meth., 3 (1990) 615.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klebe, G., Mietzner, T. and Weber, F., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 751.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bartlett, P.A. and Marlowe, C.K., Biochemistry, 26 (1987) 8553.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morihara, K. and Tsuzuki, H., Eur. J. Biochem., 15 (1970) 374.

    Google Scholar 

  21. We have to admit that is hardly possible to document by blackand-white drawings the graphical advantage of the CoMSIA maps that become obvious using an interactive computer terminal.

  22. Morgan, B.P., Scholtz, J.M., Ballinger, M.D., Zipkin, I.D. and Bartlett, P.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113 (1991) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tronrud, D.H., Holden, H.M. and Matthews, B.W., Science, 235 (1987) 571.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bartlett, P.A. and Marlowe, C.K., Science, 235 (1987) 569.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bash, U.C., Singh, P.A., Brown, F.K., Langridge, R. and Kollman, P.A., Science, 235 (1987) 574.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klebe, G., Abraham, U. Comparative Molecular Similarity Index Analysis (CoMSIA) to study hydrogen-bonding properties and to score combinatorial libraries. J Comput Aided Mol Des 13, 1–10 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008047919606

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008047919606

Navigation