Advertisement

Virus Genes

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 303–305 | Cite as

Strawberry Vein Banding Virus—Definitive Member of the Genus Caulimovirus

  • Karel PetrzikEmail author
  • Vladimir Beneš
  • Ivan Mráz
  • Jana Honetšlegrová-Fránová
  • Wilhelm Ansorge
  • Josef Špak
Article

Abstract

The complete DNA sequence (7876 nucleotides) of strawberry vein banding virus (SVBV) has been determined. Seven open reading frames are detected that potentially code for proteins of calculated weight 37.8; 18.3; 16.6; 56.0; 81.1; 59.0 and 12.6 kDa, respectively. Their position on the viral genome is the same as that of the corresponding proteins on the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) genome. Phylogenetic analysis based on the amino acid sequence of this protein shows a closer relationship of SVBV with CaMV, figwort mosaic virus and carnation etched ring virus than with other caulimoviruses.

complete DNA sequence phylogenetic relationship protein comparison strawberry vein banding virus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frazier N.W., Phytopathology 45, 307-312, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frazier N.W. and Morris T.J., in Converse R.H. (ed.) Virus diseases of small fruits. US Department of Agriculture, Corvallis, Oregon, 1987, pp. 16-20.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frazier N.W. and Converse R.F., Description of Plant Viruses, CMI and AAB, Kew, Surrey, England, 1980, No. 219.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morris T.J., Mullin R.H., Schlegel D.E., Cole A., and Alosi M.C., Phytopathology 70, 156-160, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Honetšlegrová J., Mráz I., and Špak J., Acta Horticulturae 385, 29-32, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stenger D.C., Mullin R.H., and Morris T.J., Phytopathology 78, 154-159, 1988.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brunt A.A., Crabtree K., Dallwitz M.J., Gibbs A.J., Watson L., and Zurcher E.J. (eds) Plant Viruses Online: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database, 1996, Version: 16th January 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sneath P.H.A. and Sokal R.R., Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hull R., Sadler J., and Longstaff M., EMBO J 5, 3083-3090, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franck A., Guilley H., Jonard G., Richard K., and Hirth L., Cell 21, 285-294, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Richins R.D., Scholthof H.B., and Shepherd R.J., Nucleic Acids Res 15, 8451-8466, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mesnard J.-M., Kirchherr D., Wurch T., and Lebeurier G., Virology 174, 622-624, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hay J.M., Jones M.C., Blakebrough M.L., Dasgupta I., Davies J.W., and Hull R., Nucleic Acids Res 19, 2615-2621, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hasegawa A.J., Verver A., Shimada A., Saito M., Goldbach R., Van Kammen A., Miki K., Kameya-Iwaki M., and Hibi T., Nucleic Acids Res 17, 9993-10013, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fütterer J., Kiss-Laszlo Z., and Hohn T., Cell 73, 789-802, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karel Petrzik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vladimir Beneš
    • 2
  • Ivan Mráz
    • 1
  • Jana Honetšlegrová-Fránová
    • 1
  • Wilhelm Ansorge
    • 2
  • Josef Špak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Virology, Institute of Plant Molecular BiologyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic, E-mail
  2. 2.EMBLHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations