Skip to main content
Log in

The Elasticity of Franchising

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper creates a model to test whether franchising functions as product differentiation and estimates its elasticity. Using data on the average franchisee in thirty restaurant chains, the elasticity of franchising is measured at 0.252, which is similar in magnitude to values found in previous research for the elasticity of advertising of consumer product goods. The results suggest that, at least for some franchisees, the franchise system is providing product differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asbill, R. M., 1997, ‘From Franchising Boom, A Stream of Controversial Issues’, National Law Journal 19(49) (August 4), C6.

  • Assmus, G., J. U. Farley and D. R. Lehmann, 1984, ‘How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta Analysis of Econometric Results’, Journal of Marketing Research 21, 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T., 1995a, ‘A Comparison of Franchise and Independent Small Business Survival Rates’, Small Business Economics 7, 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T., 1995b, ‘Analysis of Survival Rates Among Franchise and Independent Small Business Startups’, Journal of Small Business Management 33(2), 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T., 1998, ‘Survival Patterns among Newcomers to Franchising’, Journal of Business Venturing 13, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. and W. F. Murphy, 1976, ‘Franchising: Firms, Markets, and Intangible Assets’, Southern Economic Journal 42(April), 572–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E., 1986, ‘Information Structures of Product Markets’, Economic Inquiry 24, 95–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dnes, A. W., 1996, ‘The Economic Analysis of Franchise Contracts’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 152, 297–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, R. and P. O. Steiner, 1954, ‘Optimal Advertising and Optimal Quality’, American Economic Review 44, 826–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Franchise Annual, 1993, Lewiston, NY: INFO Franchise News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, G., 1997, Franchising, New York: Matthew Bender.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F., 1988, ‘Capital Intensity and the Firm's Cost of Capital’, Review of Economics and Statistics 52, 587–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D. J., 1991, ‘The Franchise Sale Process: Earnings Claims and Advertising’, New York Law Journal 205(72) (16 April), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, Francine, 1992, ‘Agency Theory and Franchising: Some Empirical Results’, Rand Journal of Economics 23, 263–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, F., and K.L. Shaw (1996), “The Dynamics of Franchise Contracting: Evidence from Panel Data,” NBER Working Paper 5585.

  • Lafontaine, F. and K. L. Shaw, 1998, ‘Franchisor Growth and Franchisor Entry and Exit in the U.S. Market: Myth and Reality’, Journal of Business Venturing 13, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, K., 1992, ‘The Battle Against Claims of Presale Misrepresentations and Allegations of Guaranteed Success’, Franchise Law Journal 11(3) (Winter), 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, K. A., J. Dienelt and L. Becnel, 1995, ‘Earnings Information as Basis for Claims’, Franchise Law Journal 14(3) (Winter), 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, J. J., 1976, Advertising, Competition and Market Conduct in Oligopoly over Time, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. L., 1988, Earnings Claim Study, Washington, DC: Duncan, Weinberg, Miller and Pembroke, monograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. L., 1991, Franchises: Dollars and Sense, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G. L., P. Kotler and K. S. Moorthy, 1992, Marketing Models, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancuso, J. and D. Boroian, 1993, How to Buy and Manage a Franchise, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. E. and R. T. Justis, 1993, ‘Franchising, Liquidity Constraints, and Entry’, Applied Economics 25, 1269–1277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, S. C. and H. J. Moore, 1995, ‘Returns to Franchising’, Journal of Corporate Finance: Contracting, Governance, and Organization 2, 133–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R., 1981, ‘Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications’, Bell Journal of Economics 12(Autumn), 380–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugel, T. A., 1980, ‘Profitability, Concentration, and the Interindustry Variation in Wages’, Review of Economics and Statistics 62, 248–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P. H., 1978, ‘The Theory of the Firm and the Structure of the Franchise Contract’, Journal of Law and Economics 21(April), 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R., 1989, ‘Interindustry Studies of Structure and Performance’, in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., 1996, ‘Hybrid Organizational Arrangements and Their Implications for Firm Growth and Survival: A Study of New Franchisors’, Academy of Management Journal 39, 216–234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michael, S.C. The Elasticity of Franchising. Small Business Economics 12, 313–320 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008019418231

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008019418231

Keywords

Navigation