Abstract
Private on-site sewage systems serve residential development in rural landscapes throughout the United States. In the State of Wisconsin, three major types of private sewage systems facilitate residential development on sites that span gradients in slope, soil permeability, depth to bedrock, and depth to water-table. Conventional soil-absorption sewage treatment systems are constructed on sites with minimal physiographic constraints; more highly engineered alternative sewage treatment systems are installed on sites with moderate to severe constraints; holding tanks provide no on-site sewage treatment and are employed on sites with the most severe physiographic limitations. An environmental impact statement (EIS), prepared in 1979 on the proposed widespread use of alternative private sewage systems, suggested that alternative systems might facilitate in-fill development on poor sites near existing cities and lead to compact, higher density development patterns.
The research reported in this paper tested the validity of this EIS scenario by comparing development patterns associated with a sample of conventional systems, alternative systems, and holding tanks installed during the 1980s in Ozaukee County, Wisconsin. Land use data, soils data, and other site attribute data were assembled and analyzed in a vector geographic information system (GIS). Because each type of private sewage system has a unique set of siting criteria, the three sets of sampled systems are located in significantly different physiographic regions within the County. Collectively, installations of all three systems facilitated scattered residential development throughout the rural landscape. This development consists of relatively small residential patches dispersed within an agricultural matrix. Wastewater management technology, if not constrained by public policies or other socioeconomic factors, can be an important anthropogenic factor influencing both the process and pattern of landscape change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christaller, W. 1966. Central Places in Southern Germany. (translated from Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland, 1933, by C.W. Baskin). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Cochrane, W.W. 1979. TheDevelopment ofAmerican Agriculture: a Historical Analysis. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Comeleo, R.L., J.F. Paul, P.V. August, J. Copeland, C. Baker, S.S. Hale and R.W. Latimer. 1996. Relationship between watershed stressors and sediment contamination in Chesapeake Bay estuaries. Landscape Ecology, 11(5): 307-319.
Converse, J.C. and E.J. Tyler. 1987. On-site wastewater treatment using Wisconsin mounds on difficult sites. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 30(2): 362-368.
Dandekar, H.C. 1994. Farm Type in theAmericanMidwest: a Reflection of Government Policy. In Ordering Space: Types in Architecture and Design. pp. 97-116. Edited by K.A. Franck and L.H. Schneekloth. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Engels, T.M. and C.S. Sexton. 1994. Negative correlation of blue jays and golden-cheeked warblers near an urbanizing area. Conservation Biology, 8(1): 286-290.
Forman, R.T.T. 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology, 10(3): 133-142.
Fuguitt, G.V., D.L. Brown and C.L. Beale. 1989. Rural and Small Town America. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Fuguitt, G.V. and D.L. Brown. 1990. Residential preferences and population redistribution: 1972-1988. Demography, 27(4): 589–600.
Garson, G.D. and R.S. Biggs. 1992. Analytic Mapping and Geographic Databases. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-087. Sage, Newbury Park, California.
Glantz, S.A. 1992. Primer of Biostatistics, 3rd Ed. McGrawHill, New York.
Goudie, A. 1994. The Human Impact on the Natural Environment, 4th Ed. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Hanson, M.E. and H.M. Jacobs. 1989. Private sewage system impacts inWisconsin: implications for planning and policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, (Spring): 169-180.
Holland, C.C., J. Honea, S.E. Gwin and M.E. Kentula. 1995.Wetland degradation and loss in the rapidly urbanizing area of Portland, Oregon. Wetlands, 15(4): 336-345.
Johnson, E.A.J. 1970. The Organization of Space in Developing Countries. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kamada, M. and N. Nakagoshi. 1996. Landscape structure and the disturbance regime at three rural regions in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. Landscape Ecology, 11(1): 15-25.
Kellog, R.L., G.W. TeSelle and J.J. Goebel. 1994. Highlights from the 1992 National Resources Inventory. Journal of the Soil and Water Conservation Society, 49(6): 521-527.
LaGro, J.A., Jr. 1994. Population growth beyond the urban fringe: implications for rural land use policy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28: 143-158.
LaGro, J.A., Jr. 1996. Designing without nature: unsewered residential development in rural Wisconsin. Landscape and Urban Planning, 35: 1-9.
Levy, P.S. and S. Lemeshow. 1991. Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Loesch, A. 1954. The Economics of Location. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
McDonnell, M.J. and S.T.A. Pickett (Editors). 1993. Humans as Components of Ecosystems. SpringerVerlag, New York.
Medley, K.E., S.T.A. Pickett and M.J. McDonnell. 1995. Forest-landscape structure along an urban-to-rural gradient. Professional Geographer, 47(2): 159-168.
Naiman, R.J. 1996.Water, society and landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 11(4): 193-196.
Nassauer, J.I. 1995. Culture and changing landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, 10(4): 229-327.
Pimentel, D., R. Harman, M. Pacenza, J. Pecarsky and M. Pimentel. 1994. Natural resources and an optimum human population. Population and Environment, 15: 347-369.
Popper, F.J. 1981. Unshaping growth. American Land Forum, 2(2): 8-14.
SoutheasternWisconsin Regional PlanningCommission. 1966. Soils of Southeastern Wisconsin. Planning Report No. 8. Waukesha, Wisconsin.
Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission. 1991. Land Use Classifications and Codes. Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Land Use Inventory – 1990. Waukesha, Wisconsin.
Turner, M.G. and D.H. Dale. 1991. Modeling landscape disturbance. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. pp. 232-351. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner.SpringerVerlag, New York.
US Bureau of the Census. 1983. 1980 Census of Population. Vol I. Characteristics of the Population. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
US Bureau of the Census. 1993. 1990 Census of Population. Vol I. Characteristics of the Population. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
US Department of Agriculture. 1970. Soil Survey: Ozaukee County, Wisconsin. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Vitousek, P.M. 1994. Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology, 75(7): 1861-1876.
Wardwell, J.M. 1980. Toward a theory of urbanruralmigration in the developed world. In New Directions in UrbanRural Migration. pp. 71-114. Edited by D.L. Brown and J.M. Wardwell. Academic Press, New York.
Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services. 1979. Final Environmental Impact Statement for Three Alternate Systems (Mounds) for On-Site Individual Wastewater Disposal in Wisconsin. Madison, Wisconsin.
Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations. 1990. Onsite Sewage Systems: Plan Submittal Manual. Madison, Wisconsin.
Zonneveld, I.S. and R.T.T. Forman (Editors). 1990. Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective. SpringerVerlag, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LaGro, J.A. Landscape context of rural residential development in southeastern Wisconsin (USA). Landscape Ecology 13, 65–77 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007943304840
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007943304840