Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of fine-scale spatial pattern of a grassland from remotely-sensed imagery and field collected data

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important practical problem in the analysis of spatial pattern in ecological systems is that requires spatially-intensive data, with both fine resolution and large extent. Such information is often difficult to obtain from field-measured variables. Digital imagery can offer a valuable, alternative source of information in the analysis of ecological pattern. In the present paper, we use remotely-sensed imagery to provide a link between field-based information and spatially-explicit modeling of ecological processes. We analyzed one digitized color infrared aerial photograph of a serpentine grassland to develop a detailed digital map of land cover categories (31.24 m × 50.04 m of extent and 135 mm of resolution), and an image of vegetation index (proportional to the amount of green biomass cover in the field). We conducted a variogram analysis of the spatial pattern of both field-measured (microtopography, soil depth) and image-derived (land cover map, vegetation index, gopher disturbance) landscape variables, and used a statistical simulation method to produce random realizations of the image of vegetation index based upon our characterization of its spatial structure. The analysis revealed strong relationships in the spatial distribution of the ecological variables (e.g., gopher mounds and perennial grasses are found primarily on deeper soils) and a non-fractal nested spatial pattern in the distribution of green biomass as measured by the vegetation index. The spatial pattern of the vegetation index was composed of three basic components: an exponential trend from 0 m to 4 m, which is related to local ecological processes, a linear trend at broader scales, which is related to a general change in topography across the study site, and a superimposed periodic structure, which is related to the regular spacing of deeper soils within the study site. Simulations of the image of vegetation index confirmed our interpretation of the variograms. The simulations also illustrated the limits of statistical analysis and interpolations based solely on the semivariogram, because they cannot adequately characterize spatial discontinuities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, A.C. 1986. On the fractal dimensions of some transient soil properties, J. Soil Sci. 37: 641–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M.G., J.H. Burk, and W.D. Pitts. 1987. Terrestrial Plant Ecology (2nd ed.). Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo Park,CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondini, M.E. and C.E. Grygiel. 1994. Landscape distribution of organisms and the scaling of soil resources. Am. Nat. 143: 1026–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1983a. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. I. The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation. J. Soil Sci. 34: 577–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1983b. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. II. A non-Brownian fractal model and its application in soil survey. J. Soil Sci. 34: 599–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A.D. and J.K. Ord. 1981. Spatial Processes: Models andApplications. Pion, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffin, D. and W. Laurenroth. 1989. Disturbances and gap dynamics in a semiarid grassland: a landscapelevel approach. Land. Ecol. 3: 19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.B., T.A. Spies and G.A. Bradshaw. 1990. Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure. Remote Sens. Environ. 34: 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P.J. 1988. The semivariogram in Remote Sensing: an introduction. Remote Sens. Environ. 24: 493–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P.J. and J.L. Dungan. 1989. Estimation of signaltonoise: a new procedure applied to AVIRIS data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 27: 620–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, C.V. and A.G. Journel. 1992. GSLIB. Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P.J. 1983. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape Ecology. J.Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, R.C. and P. Wintz. 1977. Digital Image Processing. AddisonWesley: Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J. 1985. Harvester ant foraging and plant species distribution in annual grassland. Oecologia 67: 519–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J. and H.A. Mooney. 1985. Community and population dynamics of serpentine grassland annuals in relation to gopher disturbance. Oecologia 67: 342–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J. and V.J. Hobbs. 1987. Gophers and grassland: a model of vegetation response to patchy soil disturbance. Vegetatio 69: 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J. and H.A. Mooney. 1991. Effects of rainfall variability and gopher disturbance on serpentine annual grassland dynamics. Ecology 72: 59 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huenneke, L., S. Hamburg, R. Koide, H. Mooney and P. Vitousek. 1990. Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in californian serpentine grassland. Ecology 71: 478–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A.R., B.T. Milne and J.A Weins. 1992. Diffusion in fractal landscapes: simulations and experimental studies of tenbionid beetle movements. Ecology 73: 1968–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A.G. and C.J. Huijbregts. 1978. Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, D.L.B., A.H. Strahler and C.E Woodcock. 1988a. Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. I. Basic theory. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 26: 463–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, D.L.B., A.H. Strahler and C.E. Woodcock. 1988b. Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. II. Simple image models. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 27: 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koide, R.T., L.F. Huenneke and H.A Mooney. 1987. Gopher mound soil reduces growth and affects ion uptake of two annual grassland species. Oecologia 72: 284–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, A., Y.T. Prairie and Y. Bergeron. 1994. Fractal dimension esimates of a fragmented landscape: sources of variability. Land. Ecol. 9: 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. and R.T. Paine. 1974. Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proc. Nat. Ac. Sci. U.S.A. 71: 2744–2747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, A. 1997. Image segmentation and discriminant analysis for the identification of landscape units in ecology. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. (forthcoming)

  • Lobo, A., N. Chiariello and K. Moloney. (In press). Finescale mapping of a grassland from digitized aerial photography: an approach using image segmentation and discriminant analysis. Int. J. Remote Sensing.

  • Mandelbrot, B.B. 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G. 1965. La Théorie des variables régionalisées et ses applications. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D.M. and P.B. Aronson. 1984. Scaledependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces: An empirical investigation, with applications in geomorphology and computer mapping. Math. Geol. 16: 671–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S.J. 1968. Structure and function in California grasslands. Ecology 49: 962–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T. 1991. Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In QuantitativeMethods in Landscape Ecology, pp. 199–235. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. SpringerVerlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T. 1992. Spatial aggregation and neutral models in fractal landscapes. Am. Nat. 139: 32–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T., K.M. Johnston and R.T.T. Forman. 1989. Scale dependent proximity of wildlife habitat in a spatiallyneutral Bayesian model. Land. Ecol. 2: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, K.A. 1993. Determining process through pattern: reality or phantasy? In Patch Dynamics. pp. 61–69. Edited by S.A. Levin, T. Powell and J. Steele. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics nb. 96, SpringerVerlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, K.A. and S.A. Levin. 1996. The effects of disturbance architecture on landscape level population dynamics. Ecology (in press).

  • Moloney, K., A Morin and S.A. Levin. 1991. Interpreting ecological patterns generated through simple stochastic processes. Land. Ecol. 5: 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, D.D. and P.R. Erlich. 1989. Conservation biology of California's remnant grasslands. In Grassland Structure and Function: California Annual Grassland. pp. 201–211. Edited by L.F. Huenneke and H. Mooney. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M.A. and R. Webster. 1986. Semivariograms for modelling the spatial pattern of landform and soil properties. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 11: 491–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R.V., B.T. Milne, M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. 1988. Resource utilization scales and landscape pattern. Land. Ecol. 2: 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.W. 1988. Fractal geometry: a tool for describing spatial patterns of plant communities. Vegetatio 75: 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.W. 1990. Spatial scale and patterns of species-environment relationships in hardwood forest of the North Carolina piedmont. Coenoses 5: 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.W. 1992. The coexistence of species in fractal landscapes. Am. Nat. 139: 375–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • PardoIguzquiza, E. and M. ChicaOlmo. 1993. The Fourier integral method: an efficient spectral method for simulation of random fields. Math. Geol. 25: 177 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. and W.M. Post. 1988. Response of northern forests to CO2induced climate change. Nature 334: 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. 1978. Evolutionary Ecology (Second ed.). Harper & Row, Publishers, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J.C. and W.C. Bausch. 1995. Leaf area index estimation from visible and nearinfrared reflectance data. Remote Sens. Environ. 52: 55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramstein, G. and M. Raffy. 1989. Analysis of the structure of radiometric remotelysensed images. Int. J. Remote Sensing 10: 1049–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R.A., R.K. Peet, M.W. Palmer and P.S. White. 1993. Scale dependence of vegetation-environment correlations: a case study of a North Carolina piedmont woodland. J.Veg. Sci. 4: 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J.A. 1993. Remote sensing digital image analysis. An introduction. SpringerVerlag, Heidelberger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B.D. 1981. Spatial Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G.P. 1987. Geostatistics in ecology: interpolating with known variance. Ecology 68: 744–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G.P., M.A. Huston, F.C. Evans and J.M. Tiedje. 1988. Spatial variability in a successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability. Ecology 69: 1517–1524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, R.E., D.J. Mulla, A.G. Journel and E.H. Franz. 1992. Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependencedependence. Ecol. Monog. 62: 277–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saupe, D. 1988. Algorithms for random fractals, In The Science of fractal images. pp. 71–136. Edited by H.O. Peitgen and D. Saupe. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Sciences 1993. SPLUS Programmer's Manual, Version 3.2, Seattle: StatSci, a division of MathSoft, Inc. 1993.

  • Steele, J.H. 1978. Some comments on plankton patchiness. Spatial patterns in plankton communities. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, R. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1987. Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. SpringerVerlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1989. Landscape Ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 20: 171–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S.J., R.V. O'Neill, W. Conley, M.R. Conley and H.C. Humphries. 1991. Pattern and Scale: Statistics for Landscape Ecology. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. pp. 17–50. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. SpringerVerlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, G.J.G. and B. Fingleton. 1985. Spatial Data Analysis by Example, Volume 1: Point Pattern and Quantitative Data. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D.L., R.V. O'Niell and H.H. Shugart. 1987. Landscape Ecology. BioScience 37: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1991. GRASS 4.0 User's Regerence Manual. U.S. Army Contruction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, Illinois. 513 pp.

  • Voss, R.F. 1988. Fractals in nature: From characterization to simulation. In The Science of fractal images. pp 21–70. Edited by H.O. Peitgen and D. Saupe. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B. 1954. The ecology of serpentine soils: II. Factors affecting plant growth on serpentine soils. Ecology 35: 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, A.S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. J. Ecol. 35: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R., P.J. Curran and J.W. Munden. 1989. Spatial correlation in reflected radiation from the ground and its implications for sampling and mapping by ground-based radiometry. Remote Sens. Environ. 29: 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R. and M.A. Oliver. 1990. Statistical methods in soil and land resource survey. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems, 2d ed. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. and S.A. Levin. 1977. The role of mosaic phenomena in natural communities. Theor. Pop. Biol. 12: 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, C.E., A.H. Strahler and D.L.B. Jupp. 1988a. The use of variograms in Remote Sensing: I. Scene models and simulated images. Remote Sens. Environ. 25: 323–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, C.E., A.H. Strahler and D.L.B. Jupp. 1988b. The use of variograms in Remote Sensing: II. Real digital images. Remote Sens. Environ. 25: 349–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. and S.A. Levin. 1994. A spatial patch dynamic modeling approach to pattern and process in an annual grassland. Ecol. Monog. 64: 447–464.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut de Ciències de la Terra (CSIC), Martí Franqués s/n, 08028, Barcelona, Spain

    Agustín Lobo

  2. Department of Botany, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011-10220, USA

    Kirk Moloney

  3. Institut de Ciències del Mar, P. Juan de Borbón s/n, 08039, Barcelona, Spain

    Oscar Chic

  4. Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA

    Nona Chiariello

Authors
  1. Agustín Lobo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kirk Moloney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oscar Chic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nona Chiariello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lobo, A., Moloney, K., Chic, O. et al. Analysis of fine-scale spatial pattern of a grassland from remotely-sensed imagery and field collected data. Landscape Ecology 13, 111–131 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007938526886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007938526886

Search

Navigation