Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic Framing: A Study of the Antecedents of Threat and Opportunity Perceptions

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model of the antecedents of managers' perceptions of market situations as threats or opportunities (strategic framing) is examined in order to explore possible explanations for managers' tendency to overlook threats and opportunities which arise due to changing market conditions. The results indicate that threat and opportunity are not polar opposites, as assumed in the literature, and that threat and opportunity perceptions have different causes. Implications of the findings for enhancing the responsiveness of firms to changing market conditions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Day, George S. (1986). Analysis for Strategic Market Decisions. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and Robin Wensley. (1988). “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority,” Journal of Marketing 52 (April), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, Jane E. (1993). “The Making of Organizational Opportunity: An Interpretive Pathway to Organizational Change.” In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 15, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 195–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———and Susan E. Jackson. (1987). “Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action,” Academy of Management Review, 12, 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, Jehoshua, Thomas S. Robertson, and Talia Rymon. (1991). “Marketing Signaling and Competitive Bluffing: An Empirical Study,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper #96–102.

  • Fredrickson, James W. (1985). “Effects of Decision Motive and Organizational Performance Level on Strategic Decision Processes,” Academy of Management Journal 28, 821–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, Jan B. and George John. (1990). “Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research 27, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, Oliver and Thomas S. Robertson. (1991). “Toward A Theory of Competitive Market Signaling,” Strategic Management Journal 12, 403–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Susan E. and Jane E. Dutton. (1988). “Discerning Threats and Opportunities,” Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 370–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. and D. Sorbum. (1989). LISREL 7. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Harold H. (1973). “The Process of Causal Attribution,” American Psychologist 28 (February), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip. (1997). Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, John, and Orville C. Walker, Jr. (1996). “Competency, Prior Performance, Opportunity Framing, and Competitive Response: Exploring Some Behavioral Decision Theory Perspectives,” Marketing Letters 7(2), 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, Barbara C. and John O. Summers. (1986). “Checking The Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments,” Journal of Marketing Research 23 (November), 317–326.

  • Porter, Michael. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, Venkatram, Hubert Gatignon, and David J. Reibstein. (1994). “Competitive Marketing Behavior in Industrial Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research 58 (April), 45–55.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Walter K. Koch Chair in Entrepreneurship

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullins, J.W., Bacon, D.R. Strategic Framing: A Study of the Antecedents of Threat and Opportunity Perceptions. Marketing Letters 9, 37–50 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007916019870

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007916019870

Navigation