Abstract
By examining both price and the level of quality, this paper empirically determines the welfare implications of local franchise and other types of regulation that existed in the cable TV industry prior to federal deregulation (1987). Contrary to the popular belief that price regulation was effective but also lowered the quality of service, I find that prices were lower and the levels of service (measured by the number of imported distant channels and cable networks) were higher than the monopolistic ones. The paper also reveals some significant differences in the welfare improvements under the alternative regulatory regimes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Briely, S.A. 1981. “State Involvement in Cable TV and Other Communication Services.” In The Cable/Broadcast Communications Book 1980–1981, edited by M.L. Hollowell Washington, D.C.,: Communication Press.
Cable Television Information Center (CTIC). 1982. A Guide for Local Policy. Arlington, Virginia: CTIC.
Comanor, W.S. and Mitchell, B.M. 1971. “Cable Television and the Impact of Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics 2:154–212.
General Accounting Office. 1990. Telecommunications:Follow-up National survey of Cable Television Rates and Services. Washington, D.C.
Hazlett, T.W. 1991. “The Demand to Regulate Franchise Monopoly: Evidence from CATV Rate Deregulation in California. Economic Inquiry 29:275–296.
Hazlett, T.W. 1995. “Cable Television Rate Deregulation.” Department of Agriculture Economics, University of California, Davis.
Hechman, J.J. 1979, “Sample Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47:153–161.
International Thomason Communications, INC. 1984. CableFile. Denver,Colorado.
Knowledge Industry Pubsclication, INC. 1982. The Home Video and Cable Yearbook 1982–83. White Plains, New York.
Mayo, J.W. and Otsuka, Y. 1991. “Demand, pricing, and Regulation: Evidence from the Cable TV Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics, 22:396–410.
Noam, E.M. 1985. “Economies of Scale in Cable Television.” In Video Media Competition: Regulation, Economics, and Technology, edited by E. M. Noam. New York, New York: Columbia University Press.
Pacey, P.L. 1985. “Cable Television in a Less Regulated Market.” Journal of Industrial Economics, 34:81–91.
Park, R.E. 1972. “Prospects for Cable in the 100 Largest Television Markets.” Bell Journal of Economics 3:130–150.
Prager, R.A. 1990. “Firm Behavior in Franchise Monopoly Markets.” RAND Journal of Economics 21:211–225.
Rubinovitz, R.N. 1993. “Market Power and Price Increase for Basic Cable Service since Deregulation.” RAND Journal of Economics 24:1–18.
Senate Hearing. 1982. Cable Television Regulation. Hearing before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, 97th Congress, Second Session, 1982.
Television Digest, INC. 1987. Cable and Station Coverage Atlas. Washington D.C.
Television Digest, INC. 1982. Television and Factbook, Washington D.C.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1983. County and City Data Book. Washington D.C.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1982. Employment and Wages. Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1980. “General Social and Economic Characteristics, United States Summary.” Census of Population. Washington, D.C.
Webb, G.K. 1983. The Economics of Cable Television. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
Zupan, M.A. 1989. “The Efficacy of Bidding in the Case of CATV: Some Systematic Evidence.” Journal of Law and Economics 32:401–456.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Otsuka, Y. A Welfare Analysis of Local Franchise and Other Types of Regulation: Evidence from the Cable TV Industry. Journal of Regulatory Economics 11, 157–180 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007902215969
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007902215969