The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 26, Issue 1–2, pp 127–141 | Cite as

Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies

  • Stephen J. Franklin
  • Mike Wright
  • Andy Lockett
Article

Abstract

Universities have two options when they formulate policies to develop new technology-based start-ups. One approach is to encourage faculty members to engage in this activity. Another avenue is to encourage surrogate (external) entrepreneurs to assume a leadership role. Based on a survey of technology transfer/business development officers at 57 U.K. universities, we examine perceptions regarding the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. We also analyze whether there are significant differences in these attitudes between universities that have launched many start-ups and those that have been less active in this arena. Our results imply that the most significant barriers to the adoption of entrepreneurial-friendly policies are cultural and informational. We also find that universities that generate the most start-ups have more favorable attitudes towards surrogate entrepreneurs. It appears that a combination of academic and surrogate entrepreneurship might be the best approach for universities that wish to develop successful technology-transfer based start-up companies.

Keywords

Economic Growth Arena Faculty Member Industrial Organization Leadership Role 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bank of England, 1996, The Financing of Technology-based Firms, Bank of England, October.Google Scholar
  2. CBI, 1997, Tech Stars: Breaking the Growth Barriers for Technology-based SMEs, London: Confederation of British Industry, Feb.Google Scholar
  3. Chrisman, J.J., T. Hynes, and S. Fraser, 1995, 'Faculty Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: The Case of the University of Calgary', J. Business Venturing 10, 267–281.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, A.C., F.J. Gimeno-Gascon, and C.Y. Woo, 1994, 'Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance', Journal of Business Venturing 9, 371–395.Google Scholar
  5. Crisp, P. and G. Melling, 1988, 'Further and Higher Education: Accountability, Access... Anarchy?', Local Government Studies 14 1, 31–38.Google Scholar
  6. Daniels, G. and C. Hofer, 1993, 'Characteristics of Successful and Unsuccessful Entrepreneurial Faculty and Their Innovative Research Teams', in N. Churchill, S. Birley, W. Bygrave, J. Doutriaux, E. Gatewood, F. Hoy, and W. Wetzel eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College pp. 598–609.Google Scholar
  7. De Vaus, D.A., 1991, Surveys in Social Research, Third Edition, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Doutriaux, J., 1987, 'Growth Patterns of Academic Entrepreneurial Firms', Journal of Business Venturing 2, 285–297.Google Scholar
  9. Felsenstein, D., 1994, 'University-Related Science Parks - 'seedbeds' or 'Enclaves' of Innovation?', Technovation 14 2, 93–110.Google Scholar
  10. Hartmon, B., A. Ardishvili, R. Cardozo, T. Elder, J. Leuthold, J. Parshall, M. Raghian, and D. Smith, 1995, 'Mapping the University Technology Transfer Process', in W. Bygrave, B. Bird, S. Birley, N. Churchill, M. Hay, R. Keeley, and W. Wetzel eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, pp. 286–298, Wellesley: Babson College.Google Scholar
  11. Kanter, R.M., L. Richardson, J. North, and E. Morgan, 1991, 'Engines of Progress: Designing and Running Entrepreneurial Vehicles in Established Companies; the New Venture Process at Eastman Kodak', Journal of Business Venturing 6, 63–82.Google Scholar
  12. Kinsella, R. and V. McBrierty, 1997, 'Campus Companies and the Emerging Techno-Academic Paradigm: The Irish Experience', Technovation 17 5, 245–251.Google Scholar
  13. Mason, C. and R. Harrison, 1996, 'Informal Venture Capital: A Study of the Investment Process, the Post-Investment Experience and Investment Performance', Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 8, 105–125.Google Scholar
  14. McGee, J.E. and M.J. Dowling, 1994, 'Using R & D Co-Operative Arrangements to Leverage Managerial Experience: A Study of Technology-Intensive New Ventures', Journal Business Venturing 9 1, 33–48.Google Scholar
  15. Norusis, M.J., 1993, SPSS for Windows: Base System Users Guide Release 6.0, Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  16. Parker, D.D. and D. Zilberman, 1993, 'University Technology Transfers: Impacts on Local and US Economies', Contemporary Policy Issues 11 2, 87–99.Google Scholar
  17. Proctor, P., 1993, 'Universities Seek Role as Technology Transfer Catalysts', Aviation Week and Space Technology 139 13, 55–56.Google Scholar
  18. Radosevich, R., 1995, 'A Model for Entrepreneurial Spin-Offs from Public Technology Sources', Int. J. Technol. Management 10 (7/8), 879–893.Google Scholar
  19. Robbie, K., M. Wright, and M. Albrighton, 1999, 'High-tech Management Buy-outs', Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance 1 (3), 219–240.Google Scholar
  20. Samson, K.J. and M.A. Gurdon, 1993, 'University Scientists as Entrepreneurs: A Special Case of Technology Transfer and High Technology Venturing', Technovation 13 (2), 63–71.Google Scholar
  21. Siegel, D., D. Waldman, and A.N. Link, 1999, 'Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study', NBER Working Paper a7256, July 1999.Google Scholar
  22. Smilor, R.W., 1990, 'University Spin-Out Companies: Technology Start-Ups from UT-Austin', Journal of Business Venturing 5, 63–76.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, J., 1995, 'A Statistical Analysis of the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A 158, 241–261.Google Scholar
  24. Venkataraman, S., I. MacMillan, and R. McGrath, 1992, 'Progress in Research on Corporate Venturing', in D.L. Sexton and J. Kasarda eds., The State of the Art of Entrepreneurship, pp. 487–519, Boston: PWS-Kent.Google Scholar
  25. Westhead, P. and D.J. Storey, 1995, 'Links Between Higher Education Institutions and High Technology Firms', Omega, International Journal of Management Science 23 (4), 345- 360.Google Scholar
  26. Wright, M., K. Robbie, and C. Ennew, 1997, 'Venture Capitalists and Serial Entrepreneurs', Journal of Business Venturing 12 (3), 227–249.Google Scholar
  27. Wright, M. and K. Robbie, 1998, 'Venture Capital and Private Equity: A Review and Synthesis', Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 25 (5/6), 521–570.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Franklin
    • 1
  • Mike Wright
    • 2
  • Andy Lockett
    • 3
  1. 1.ANGLE Technology LimitedManchester
  2. 2.Center for Management Buy Out Research, Business School and Zeton Ltd.University of NottinghamNottingham
  3. 3.Center for Management Buy Out Research, Business SchoolUniversity of NottinghamNottingham

Personalised recommendations