REFERENCES
Boudon, R.: 1986, L'idéologie. L'origine des idées reçues. Paris: Fayard.
Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1987, 'Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective', Argumentation 1(3), 283–301
Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectal Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eemeren, F. H van, R. Grootendorst, and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lo Cascio, V.: 1991, Grammatica dell'Argomentare. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Lo Cascio, V.: 1998, Gramática de la argomentación. Translation of Grammatica dell'Argomentare. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.
Pera, M.: 1991, Scienza e Retorica [Science and Rhetoric]. Bari: Laterza.
Pera, M.: 1994, The Discourse of Science. Translation of Scienza e retorica. Chicago/London The University of Chicago Press.
Schopenhauer, A.: 1818–1830, Eristische Dialektik. In: A. Hübscher (Ed.), Der Handschriftliche Nachlass. Band III (pp. 666–695). Frankfurt am Main: Berliner Manuskripte, Waldemar Kramer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cascio, E.L. Cattani, Adelino (1995). Discorsi Ingannevoli: argomenti per difendersi, attaccare, divertisrsi. Padova: Edizioni GB, 208 pp.. Argumentation 14, 475–480 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007882823509
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007882823509