Skip to main content
Log in

Cattani, Adelino (1995). Discorsi Ingannevoli: argomenti per difendersi, attaccare, divertisrsi. Padova: Edizioni GB, 208 pp.

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Boudon, R.: 1986, L'idéologie. L'origine des idées reçues. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1987, 'Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective', Argumentation 1(3), 283–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectal Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F. H van, R. Grootendorst, and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans: 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo Cascio, V.: 1991, Grammatica dell'Argomentare. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo Cascio, V.: 1998, Gramática de la argomentación. Translation of Grammatica dell'Argomentare. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pera, M.: 1991, Scienza e Retorica [Science and Rhetoric]. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pera, M.: 1994, The Discourse of Science. Translation of Scienza e retorica. Chicago/London The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, A.: 1818–1830, Eristische Dialektik. In: A. Hübscher (Ed.), Der Handschriftliche Nachlass. Band III (pp. 666–695). Frankfurt am Main: Berliner Manuskripte, Waldemar Kramer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cascio, E.L. Cattani, Adelino (1995). Discorsi Ingannevoli: argomenti per difendersi, attaccare, divertisrsi. Padova: Edizioni GB, 208 pp.. Argumentation 14, 475–480 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007882823509

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007882823509

Navigation