Skip to main content
Log in

Amlodipine and Physiological Responses to Brisk Exercise in Healthy

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary. Recent studies have questioned the safety of calcium antagonists in general, and short-acting dihydropyridine derivatives in particular. Reasons include excessive catecholamine stimulation after stress. We therefore wanted to assess whether amlodipine, a second generation dihydropyridine with a prolonged plasma half-life, would show a more favourable haemodynamic and biochemical profile after strenuous exercise. For this purpose, we studied 9 healthy volunteers in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. After 10 days of amlodipine, 5mg orally daily or placebo therapy, volunteers performed a treadmill effort test; the sequence was repeated after a 2-week washout period. Amlodipine caused a significant increase in mean resting heart rate (HR) (from 65 ± 3 to 70 ± 3 beats/min, p < 0.05), without changing systolic or diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP). Post-exercise haemodynamic responses were similar while on amlodipine or placebo therapy. Amlodipine did not alter the normal profile of resting or exercise-induced metabolic [plasma glucose, serum K+, serum free fatty acid (FFA)] and hormonal [plasma cortisol, growth hormone, prolactin, insulin, epinephrine (EPI) and norepinephrine (NE)] responses—although plasma EPI concentrations dropped significantly lower (p < 0.05) at 5 min and 15 min post-exercise while on the calcium antagonist. We conclude that amlodipine has a largely neutral effect on the physiological profile after brisk exercise in healthy young subjects and that this may prove to be a useful property for a vasodilator drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chalmers J, Zanchetti A. The 1996 report of a World Health Organization expert committee on hypertension control. J Hypertens 1996;14:929–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Metha JL, Lopez LM. A double-blind evaluation of amlodipine in patients with chronic, stable angina: Sustained efficacy and lack of ‘withdrawal phenomenon’ upon abrupt discontinuation. Clin Cardiol 1994;17:17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joffe BI, Shires R, Lamprey JM, et al. Nifedipine does not impair the hormonal response to exercise in healthy subjects. Hormone Res 1985;21:88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agabiti-Rosei E, Muiesan ML, Romanelli G, et al. Similarities and differences in the antihypertensive effect of two calcium antagonist drugs, verapamil and nifedipine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:916–924.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klug EQ, Joffe BI, Panz VR, Meyer TE, Fine BJ, Seftel HC. Perindopril and physiologic responses to exercise. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994;23:864–868.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Psaty BM, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD, et al. The risk of myocardial infarction associated with antihypertensive drug therapies. JAMA 1995;274:620–625.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Opie LH. Calcium channel blockers for hypertension: Dissecting the evidence for adverse effects. Am J Hypertens 1997;10:565–577.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meredith PA, Elliot HL. Clinical pharmacokinetics of amlodipine. Clin Pharmacokinet 1992;22:22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shimizu S, Tani Y, Yamada H, Tabata M, Murachi T. Enzymatic determination of serum free fatty acids: A colorimetric method. Anal Biochem 1980;107:193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lau CP, Cheung BM. Relative efficacy and tolerability of licidipine and amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: A randomised double-blind study. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1996;28:328–331.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kario K, Shimada K. Differential effects of amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients with different nocturnal reductions in blood pressure. Am J Hypertens 1997;10:261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldsmith SR. Effect of amlodipine and felodipine on sympathetic activity and baroreflex function in normal humans. Am J Hypertens 1995;8:902–908.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vertovec GW, Plumb V, Epstein AE, Kay GN. Evaluation of the acute and electrophysiologic effects of intravenous amlodipine alone and in combination with a beta-blocker in patients with angina pectoris. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1993;22(Suppl):S29–S33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Esler M, Kaye D, Lambert G, Esler D, Jennings G. Adrenergic nervous system in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:7L–14L.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Phillips RA, Ardeljan M, Shimabukuro S. Normalization of left ventricular mass and associated changes in neurohormones and atrial natriuretic peptide after 1 year of sustained nifedipine therapy for severe hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:1595–1602.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leenen FH, Fourney A. Comparison of the effects of amlodipine and diltiazem on 24-hour blood pressure, plasma catecholamines and left ventricular mass. Am J Cardiology 1996;78:203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nazzaro P, Manzari M, Merlo M, et al. Antihypertensive treatment with verapamil and amlodipine. Their effect on the functional autonomic and cardiovascular stress responses. Eur Heart J 1995;16:1277–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hamada T, Watanabe M, Kaneda T, et al. Evaluation of changes in sympathetic nerve activity and heart rate in essential hypertensive patients induced by amlodipine and nifedipine. J Hypertens 1998;16:111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Irving MH, Britton BJ, Wood WG, Padgham C, Carruthers M. Effects of β adrenergic blockade on plasma catecholamines in exercise. Nature 1974;248:531–533.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klug EQ, Joffe BI. Physiological responses to brisk exercise and the impact of commonly used antihypertensive drugs. Hospital Update 1995;9:35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paolisso G, Gualdiero P, Manzella D, et al. Association of fasting plasma free fatty acid concentration and frequency of ventricular premature complexes in nonischemic non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:932–937.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Faulkner JK, McGibney D, Chasseaud LF, Perry JL, Taylor IW. The pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in healthy volunteers after single intravenous and oral doses and after 14 repeated oral doses given once daily. Br J Clin Pharmac 1986;22:21–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stankovic, S., Panz, V., Klug, E. et al. Amlodipine and Physiological Responses to Brisk Exercise in Healthy. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 13, 513–517 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007875603969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007875603969

Navigation