Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of the ARM Share of FHA and Conventional Lending

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loan-choice research has generally examined the determinants of fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) versus ARM lending in the single-family conventional market. Little attention has been paid to the significant differences in ARM lending between the GSE conforming and jumbo markets, as well as differences in the FHA market. For example, the ARM share of jumbo originations is generally two to three times that of the conforming market. This article extends past analysis by examining the determinants of ARM market share in the conventional conforming, jumbo, and FHA markets. Mortgage-pricing variables and the slope of the Treasury yield curve, a proxy for expectations of the time path of ARM indexes, were generally found to be significant. Further, the geographic shift in FHA lending toward the California market since 1992 was found to explain a significant part of the increase in the ARM share of FHA originations during the mid-1990s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brueckner, J. K., and J. R. Follain. (1988). ‘The Rise and Fall of the Arm: An Econometric Analysis of Mortgage Choice,’ Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 93-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterman, R. F., and J. E. Pearce. (1996). ‘The Effects of the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation on Conventional Fixed-Rate Mortgage Yields.’ In HUD, Studies on Privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (pp. 97-168). Washington, DC.

  • Dhillon, U., J. D. Shilling, and C. F. Sirmans. (1987). ‘Choosing Between Fixed-and Adjustable-Rate Mortgages,’ Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 19, 260-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. G., and A. J. Heuson. (1992). ‘Fixed Versus Variable Rate Financing: The Influence of Borrower, Lender, and Market Characteristics,’ Journal of Financial Services Research 6, 49-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, P. H., and J. D. Shilling. (1989). ‘The Impact of the Agencies on Conventional Fixed-Rate Mortgage Yields,’ Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2, 101-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICF, Incorporated. (1990). Effects of the Conforming Loan Limit on Mortgage Markets. Report prepared for HUD.

  • Nothaft, F. E., and G. H. K. Wang. (1992). ‘Determinants of the Arm Share of National and Regional Lending,’ Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 5, 219-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse LLP. (1996). An Actuarial Review for Fiscal Year 1995 of the Federal Housing Administration's Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund. Final Report. Washington, DC.

  • Price Waterhouse LLP. (1997). An Actuarial Review for Fiscal Year 1996 of the Federal Housing Administration's Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund. Final Report. Washington, DC.

  • Sa-Aadu, J., and C. F. Sirmans. (1995). ‘Differentiated Contracts, Heterogeneous Borrowers, and the Mortgage Choice Decision,’ Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27, 498-510.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berkovec, J.A., Kogut, D.J. & Nothaft, F.E. Determinants of the ARM Share of FHA and Conventional Lending. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22, 23–41 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007875225864

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007875225864

Navigation