Skip to main content
Log in

Increased Buyer Concentration and Its Effects on Profitability in the Manufacturing Sector

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article details the increase in buyerconcentration that has occurred throughout themanufacturing sector in recent years and explores itseffects on manufacturers' profitability. The articledevelops a new firm-level data set derived fromSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Form 10-Ksubmissions to explore this topic among 218 firms in19 industries. The article's econometric resultsconflict with economic theory's prediction thatgreater buyer concentration is likely to be associatedwith lower seller profits principally in oligopolisticindustries. To the contrary, the results suggest thatbuyer concentration reduces profitability primarily incompetitive rather than oligopolistic industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block, Sandra (1996) ‘There's a Right Time to Ax the Investment Axiom’, USA Today, International Edition, July 22, 6A.

  • Bradburd, Ralph M. (1982) ‘Price-Cost Margins in Producer Goods Industries and the “Importance of Being Unimportant” ‘, Review of Economics and Statistics, LXIV, 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, John M., Richard T. Rogers, and Vijay Bhagavan (1996) ‘Concentration Change and Countervailing Power in the U.S. Food Manufacturing Industries’, Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 473–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Economic Advisers (1998) Economic Report of the President 1998, Washington, D.C.

  • Cowley, Peter R. (1986) ‘Business Margins and Buyer/Seller Power’, Review of Economics and Statistics, LXVIII, 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards Board, SFAS No. 30: Disclosure of Information About Major Customers, August 1979.

  • Foroohar, Kambiz (1995) ‘A Tough Market Forces Dye Suppliers to Realign’, Chemical Week, 157, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth (1952) American Capitalism, The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William H. (1993) Econometric Analysis, 2nd edn. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William H. (1998) Limdep Version 7.0, User's Manual, Revised edition. Plainview, NY: Econometrics Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, Jan (1986) Elements of Econometrics, 2nd edn. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, Vincent (1979) The Impact of Buyer Concentration – An Extension, The Review of Economics and Statistics, LXVIII, 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, Alan, and Richard C. Shumway (1994) ‘Nonparametric Tests forMonopsonistic Market Power Exertion’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 1156–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustgarten, Steven H. (1975) ‘The Impact of Buyer Concentration in Manufacturing Industries’, Review of Economics and Statistics, LVII, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion, Bruce W., and Frederick E. Geithman (1995) ‘Concentration-Price Relations in Regional Cattle Markets’, The Review of Industrial Organization, 10, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marn, Michael (1997) ‘Inflation: The Rules Have Changed’, USA Today, Magazine, 125, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrowski, Jeff (1998) ‘Big Customers, Big Demands Landing a National Account Can Bring Plenty of New Hassles to a Small Business’, South Florida Business Journal, 18, 1B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael (1974) ‘Consumer Behavior, Retailer Power and Market Performance in Consumer Goods Industries’, Review of Economics and Statistics LVI, 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressler, Margaret Webb (1997) ‘The Fall of the House of Hechinger; Slow Reaction in the Market that it Created Led to Swift Decline’, Washington Post, July 21, F12.

  • Ravenscraft, David J. (1983) ‘Structure-Profit Relationships at the Line of Business and Industry Level’, Review of Economics and Statistics, LXV, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renstrom, Roger (1995) ‘OEMs Encourage Suppliers to Get On-Line’, Plastic News, May 1, 4.

  • Rogers, Richard T., and Richard J. Sexton (1994) ‘Assessing the Importance of Oligopsony Power in Agricultural Markets’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 1143–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Francisco Chronicle (The) (1995) ‘Top Executives Offer Views on Industry Trends’, February 2, D1.

  • Scherer, F. M., and David Ross (1990) Industrial Market Structure, 3rd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (1997) Form 10-K Submissions (for manufacturers in the study's sample).

  • Standard & Poor's (various issues) Industry Surveys.

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1994 and 1989) Census of Manufacturing, Concentration Ratios in Manufacturing, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1996 and 1993) Annual Survey of Manufactures. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh Kerri, and Robert Westervelt (1998) ‘Paintmakers Forced to Buy Market Share’, Chemical Week, June 3, 34.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, T., Gosman, M.L. Increased Buyer Concentration and Its Effects on Profitability in the Manufacturing Sector. Review of Industrial Organization 17, 41–59 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007870816171

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007870816171

Navigation