Diuretic Downsides—But in Low Doses They Still Seem Among the Best Authenticated Antihypertensives

Abstract

Diuretics in low doses have the greatest support among current available antihypertensives in that they have been shown to reduce total mortality, coronary mortality, stroke, and congestive heart failure in an important meta-analysis by Psaty. Recently, Messerli has linked long-term diuretic use to renal cell carcinoma in women. In some patients, diuretic use leads to increasing blood cholesterol and blood sugar levels. Impotence is a recognized side effect, with rates rising about twofold with low-dose chlorthalidone and fourfold with a higher dose. Certain population groups such as younger (<60 years) white males often do not respond to low-dose diuretic therapy with an adequate blood pressure fall. In females of a similar age group, Messerli calculates that prolonged diuretic therapy will prevent only one stroke and no coronary events nor any deaths for every renal cell carcinoma that is provoked. Despite these evident problems, the outcome data on hard endpoints in trials with initial low-dose diuretic therapy remain valid and convincing. Thus, it is argued, low- but not high-dose diuretics retain their primacy in the ranking of antihypertensive therapy.