Abstract
Previous scholarship has focused on inductive and deductive patterns as the two predominant modes of reasoning. In this paper, we argue that there are many ways that people from diverse cultures organize their justificatory reasoning in conversation with others and that these patterns are connected, in part, to cultural beliefs and values. We report on a study of people who identify themselves as being in one of four cultural groups: African Americans, Asian Americans, Asians, and European Americans. The types of organization they used in their conversations included deductive, inductive, abductive, and narrative patterns. Abduction occurred as often as induction and deduction across groups. Narratives were used equally by all of the groups, but they occurred less frequently than the other types. Asian Americans used inductive patterns more than other types, and Asians were most likely to reason deductively. These choices did not appear to have an effect on partners' judgments, although Asians received the lowest appropriateness ratings, and both Asians and Asian Americans were given the lowest effectiveness ratings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bateson, G.: 1979, Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity, E. P. Dutton, New York.
Bauman, R.: 1986, Story, Performance, and Event: Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Borthwick, B. M.: 1967, 'The Islamic Sermon as a Channel of Political Communication', The Middle East Journal 21, 299–313.
Burgoon, M., J. P. Dillard, N. E. Doran and M. D. Miller: 1982, 'Cultural and Situational Influences on the Process of Persuasive Strategy Selection', International Journal of Intercultural Relations 6, 85–99.
Bybee, M. D.: 1991, 'Abduction and Rhetorical Theory', Philosophy and Rhetoric 24, 281–300.
Bybee, M. D.: 1996, 'Abductive Inferences and the Structure of Scientific Knowledge', Argumentation 10, 25–46.
Choi, Y. H.: 1988, 'Text Structure of Korean Speakers' Argumentative Essays in English', World Englishes 7, 129–142.
Collier, M. J.: 1996, 'Communication Competence Problematics in Ethnic Friendships', Communication Monographs 63, 314–336.
Connor, U.: 1996, Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second-language Writing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dolan, D.: 1998, The Communal Function of Reciprocal Personal Experience Storytelling, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Domino, B.: 1994, 'Two Models of Abductive Inquiry', Philosophy and Rhetoric 27, 63–65.
Eggington, W. G.: 1987, 'Written Academic Discourse in Korean: Implications for Effective Communication', in U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), Writing Across Languages: Analyses of L 2 Text, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 153–168.
Fitch, K. L.: 1994, 'A Cross-cultural Study of Directive Sequences and Some Implications for Compliance-gaining Research', Communication Monographs 61, 185–209.
Foss, S. K. and C. L. Griffin: 1995, 'Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric', Communication Monographs 62, 2–18.
Gilbert, M. A.: 1997, Coalescent Argumentation, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Glenn, E. S., D. Witmeyer, and K. A. Stevenson: 1977, 'Cultural Styles of Persuasion', International Journal of Intercultural Relations 1, 52–66.
Govier, T.: 1992, A Practical Study of Argument, 3rd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Gudykunst, W. B. and T. Nishida: 1994, Bridging Japanese/North American Differences, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Hinds, J.: 1990, 'Inductive, Deductive, Quasi-inductive: Expository Writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Thai', in U. Connor and A. M. Johns (eds.), Coherence in Writing: Research and Pedagogical Perspectives, TESOL, Alexandria, VA, 89–109.
Hirokawa, R. Y. and A. Miyahara: 1986, 'A Comparison of Influence Strategies Utilized by Managers in American and Japanese Organizations', Communication Quarterly 34, 250–265.
Johnstone, B.: 1986, 'Arguments with Khomeini: Rhetorical Situation and Persuasive Style in Cross-cultural Perspective', Text 6, 171–187.
Johnstone, B.: 1989, 'Linguistic Strategies and Cultural Styles for Persuasive Discourse', in S. Ting-Toomey and F. Korzenny (eds.), Language, Communication, and Culture: Current Directions, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 139–156.
Johnstone, B.: 1996, The Linguistic Individual: Self Expression in Language and Linguistics, Oxford University Press, New York.
Johnstone, B.: 1997, Language, Culture, and Self in Language Learning. Unpublished manuscript.
Jonsen, A. R. and S. Toulmin: 1988, The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Kane, M.: 1997, Wisdom of the Tale: Behavioral Modeling as Persuasive Style in Japanese Tea Stories. Unpublished manuscript.
Kaplan, R. B.: 1966, 'Cultural Thought Patterns in Inter-cultural Education', Language Learning 16, 1–20.
Kaplan, R. B.: 1987, 'Cultural Thought Patterns Revisited', in U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), Writing Across Languages: Analyses of L 2 Text, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 9–21.
Kinneavy, J. L.: 1971, A Theory of Discourse: The Aims of Discourse, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Krippendorff, K.: 1980, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Lautamatti, L.: 1990, 'Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse', in U. Connor and A. M. Johns (eds.), Coherence in Writing: Research and Pedagogical Perspectives, TESOL, Alexandria, VA, 29–40.
Li, X-M.: 1996, 'Good Writing' in Cross-cultural Context, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
Makau, J. M.: 1992, 'Revisioning the Argumentation Course', Women's Studies in Communication 15, 79–91.
Marwell, G. and D. R. Schmitt.: 1967, 'Dimensions of Compliance-gaining Behavior: An Empirical Analysis', Sociometry 30, 350–364.
McLaurin, P.: 1995, 'An Examination of the Effect of Culture on Pro-social Messages Directed at African-American At-risk Youth', Communication Monographs 62, 301–326.
O'Keefe, B. J. 1997, 'Variation, Adaptation, and Functional Explanation in the Study of Message Design', in G. Philipsen and T. L. Albrecht (eds.), Developing Communication Theories, SUNY Press, Albany, NY, 85–118.
Peirce, C. S.: 1932, Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. II, C. Hartshome and P. Weiss (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Perelman, C.: 1990, 'The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning', in P. Bizzell and B. Herzberg (eds.), The Rhetorical Tradition, St. Martin's, Boston, 1077–1103.
Rubin, R. B., P. Palmgreen, and H. E. Sypher (eds.): 1994, Communication Research Methods, Guilford, New York.
Van Dijk, T. A.: 1980, Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Walker, G. B.: 1989, 'Assessing Multicultural Argument in the Law of the Sea Negotiations: A Rationale and Analytical Framework', in B. E. Gronbeck (ed.), Spheres of Argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association/American Forensic Association, Annandale, VA, 599–607.
Walker, G. B.: 1990, July, The Law of the Sea Negotiations and International Communication Relations Research, Paper presented to the 25th Anniversary Conference of the International Peace Research Association, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wood, N. V.: 1998, Perspectives on Argument (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warnick, B., Manusov, V. The Organization of Justificatory Discourse in Interaction: A Comparison Within and Across Cultures. Argumentation 14, 381–404 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007832910904
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007832910904