Skip to main content
Log in

Regulation and Cost Inefficiency

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The well known Averch Johnson effect states thatrate-of-return regulation will induce costinefficient production. This paper examinesregulation induced inefficiency in broad set ofenvironments including arbitrary regulatorymechanisms, multiple outputs/inputs, uncertainty,time dynamics, price discrimination, and more. Ishow that the Averch Johnson effect appliesthroughout a wide variety of settings. Despite thegenerality of framework, my analysis is trulyelementary and does not rely on Kuhn–Tucker analysisor three dimensional graphics. I also provideresults and discussion which clarifies the limits toAverch and Johnson-like insights in practicalapplications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averch, Harvey, and Leland L. Johnson (1962)‘Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint’ American Economic Review, 52, 1052–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Elizabeth E. (1973) Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J., and Alvin K. Klevorick (1970)‘Input Choices and Rate-of-Return Regulation: An Overview of the Discussion’ Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1, 162–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, Dennis W., and Jeffrey M. Perloff (1999) Modern Industrial Organization, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley-Longman.

  • Klevorick, Alvin K. (1966)‘The Graduated Fair Return: A Regulatory Proposal’ American Economic Review, 56, 477–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Roger (1972)‘The Rate-of-Return Regulated Public Utility Firm is Schizophrenic’ Applied Economics, 4, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Roger (1985)‘The Averch and Johnson Analysis of Public Utility Regulation Twenty Years Later’ Review of Industrial Organization, 2, 178–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, Kenneth E. (1991) Optimal Regulation: The Economic Theory of Natural Monopoly. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, John M. Vernon, and Joseph E. Harrington Jr. (1996 ) Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfield, Fred M. (1965)‘Regulation and Conspiracy’ American Economic Review, 55, 424–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. E. (1970)‘A Geometric Treatment of Averch-Johnson's Behavior of the Firm Model’ American Economic Review, 60, 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolpin, V. Regulation and Cost Inefficiency. Review of Industrial Organization 18, 175–182 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007823231402

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007823231402

Navigation