Abstract
Because of the nature of assembly-line operations, one would expect technologies in manufacturing firms to differ in systematic ways from those in many other types of firms. Identifying such differences can therefore be useful in the formulation and testing of restrictions to flexible functional forms. In the present paper, I characterize a multiproduct manufacturing firm and use the characterization to formulate testable hypotheses about the firm's technology, cost function, and profit function. I argue that manufacturing enterprises exhibit a form of almost nonjointness in input quantities and prices in which the individual sub-technologies have quasi-fixed proportions. Substitution across product lines is responsible for the substitutability between material and value-adding inputs that we often observe in aggregate data. Neglecting the special structure of manufacturing technology can seriously bias estimates of aggregate productivity growth rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. J., L. Hurwicz, and H. Uzawa. (1961). “Constraint Qualifications in Maximization Problems.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 8, 175-191.
Diewert, W. E. (1971). “An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function.” Journal of Political Economy 79, 481-507.
Fare, R., and S. Grosskopf. (1996). “Productivity and Intermediate Products: A Frontier Approach.” Economics Letters 50, 65-70.
Griliches, Z., and F. Lichtenberg. (1984). “Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth: A Reexamination.” Review of Economics and Statistics 66, 324-329.
Gullickson,W., and M. J. Harper. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Personal communication.
Hall, R. E. (1973). “The Specification of Technology with Several Kinds of Output.” Journal of Political Economy 81, 879-892.
Jones, L. E. (1988). “The Characteristics Model, Hedonic Prices, and the Clientele Effect.” Journal of Political Economy 96, 551-567.
Jorgenson, D.W., F. M. Gollop, and B. Fraumeni. (1987). Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kohli, U. R. (1985). “Technology and Public Goods.” Journal of Public Economics 26, 379-400.
Lancaster, K. (1975). “Socially Optimal Product Differentiation.” American Economic Review 65, 567-585.
Livernois, J. R., and D. L. Ryan. (1989). “Testing for Non-Jointness in Oil and Gas Exploration: A Variable Profit Function Approach.” International Economic Review 30, 479-504.
Morrison, C. J. (1982). “Unraveling the Productivity Growth Slowdown in the United States, Canada, and Japan: The Effects of Subequilibrium, Scale Economies, and Markups.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74, 381-393.
Norrbin, Stefan C. (1993). “The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry: A Contradiction.” Journal of Political Economy 101, 1149-1164.
Rosen, S. (1974). “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 82, 34-55.
Sexton, R.J., B.M. Wilson, and J.J. Wann. (1989). “Some Tests of the Economic Theory of Cooperatives: Methodology and Application to Cotton Ginning.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14, 56-66.
Wohlgenant, M. (1989). “Demand for Farm Output in a Complete System of Demand Functions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71, 241-252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buccola, S.T. Material And Value-Adding Inputs In Manufacturing Enterprises. Journal of Productivity Analysis 13, 231–247 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007823025460
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007823025460