Skip to main content
Log in

Material And Value-Adding Inputs In Manufacturing Enterprises

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of the nature of assembly-line operations, one would expect technologies in manufacturing firms to differ in systematic ways from those in many other types of firms. Identifying such differences can therefore be useful in the formulation and testing of restrictions to flexible functional forms. In the present paper, I characterize a multiproduct manufacturing firm and use the characterization to formulate testable hypotheses about the firm's technology, cost function, and profit function. I argue that manufacturing enterprises exhibit a form of almost nonjointness in input quantities and prices in which the individual sub-technologies have quasi-fixed proportions. Substitution across product lines is responsible for the substitutability between material and value-adding inputs that we often observe in aggregate data. Neglecting the special structure of manufacturing technology can seriously bias estimates of aggregate productivity growth rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. J., L. Hurwicz, and H. Uzawa. (1961). “Constraint Qualifications in Maximization Problems.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 8, 175-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. (1971). “An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function.” Journal of Political Economy 79, 481-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., and S. Grosskopf. (1996). “Productivity and Intermediate Products: A Frontier Approach.” Economics Letters 50, 65-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., and F. Lichtenberg. (1984). “Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth: A Reexamination.” Review of Economics and Statistics 66, 324-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullickson,W., and M. J. Harper. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Personal communication.

  • Hall, R. E. (1973). “The Specification of Technology with Several Kinds of Output.” Journal of Political Economy 81, 879-892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. E. (1988). “The Characteristics Model, Hedonic Prices, and the Clientele Effect.” Journal of Political Economy 96, 551-567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W., F. M. Gollop, and B. Fraumeni. (1987). Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • Kohli, U. R. (1985). “Technology and Public Goods.” Journal of Public Economics 26, 379-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1975). “Socially Optimal Product Differentiation.” American Economic Review 65, 567-585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livernois, J. R., and D. L. Ryan. (1989). “Testing for Non-Jointness in Oil and Gas Exploration: A Variable Profit Function Approach.” International Economic Review 30, 479-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C. J. (1982). “Unraveling the Productivity Growth Slowdown in the United States, Canada, and Japan: The Effects of Subequilibrium, Scale Economies, and Markups.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74, 381-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrbin, Stefan C. (1993). “The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry: A Contradiction.” Journal of Political Economy 101, 1149-1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1974). “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 82, 34-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, R.J., B.M. Wilson, and J.J. Wann. (1989). “Some Tests of the Economic Theory of Cooperatives: Methodology and Application to Cotton Ginning.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14, 56-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgenant, M. (1989). “Demand for Farm Output in a Complete System of Demand Functions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71, 241-252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buccola, S.T. Material And Value-Adding Inputs In Manufacturing Enterprises. Journal of Productivity Analysis 13, 231–247 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007823025460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007823025460

Navigation