Skip to main content
Log in

Equilibrium Versus the Invisible Hand

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twentieth century equilibrium modeling depicts an end state toward which an economy tends, whereas the invisible hand, as Adam Smith depicted it, suggests an economy continually progressing as an increased division of labor is produced by growing markets. Thus, there is an inherent tension between the concepts of an equilibrium outcome versus the invisible hand process. The paper discusses different concepts of equilibrium, and relates entrepreneurship to the invisible hand. The paper concludes that the invisible hand concept provides a more fruitful framework for economic analysis than the twentieth century equilibrium framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A.A. and Demsetz, H. (1972) “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review, 62: 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchon, G. (1985) The Invisible Hand of Planning: Capitalism, Social Science, and the State in the 1920s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armentano, D.T. (1972) The Myths of Antitrust: Economic Theory and Legal Cases. New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armentano, D.T. (1982) Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1996) “Democracy and Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth, 1: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, F.M. (1957) “The Simple Analytics of Welfare Maximization.” American Economic Review, 67: 22–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1937) “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica, 4: 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C.E. (1969) Microeconomic Theory (revised edition) Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, H. (1889) Progress and Poverty: An Inquiry into the Cause of Industrial Depressions, and of Increase of Want with Increase of Wealth—The Remedy. London: K. Paul, Trench.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaf, J. de V. (1957) Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J. and Lawson, R. (1997) Economic Freedom of the World: 1997 Report. Vancouver: Faser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F.H. (1984) Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D.A. (1996) Entrepreneurship and the Market Process. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1945) “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review, 35: 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1949) “Economics and Knowledge,” In: F.A. Hayek (Ed.) Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R.G. (1989) Economic Models and Methodology. New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R.G. (1998) “Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth.” Quarterly Review of Austrian Economics, 1: 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1972) “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics.” Economic Journal, 82: 1237–1255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1963) Market Theory and the Price System. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1979) Perception, Opportunity and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A.O. (1993) The Political Economy of Policy Reform in Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, P. (1997) “Hayekian Equilibrium and Change.” Journal of Economic Methodology, 4: 245–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E., Jr. (1988) “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. von (1966) Human Action (3rd revised edition) Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. von (1998) “Monopoly Prices.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1986) “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy, 94: 1002–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1990) “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy, 98: S71–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, M.N. (1962) Man, Economy, and State. Los Angeles: Nash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. and Solow, R.M. (1960) “Analytical Aspects of Antiinflation Policy.” American Economic Review, 50: 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, G.W. (1988) “The Institutional Framework and Economic Development.” Journal of Political Economy, 96: 652–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. [1937 (1776)] The Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House, Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. (1956) “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70: 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1987) “The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price.” Journal of Economic Literature, 25: 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1994) Whither Socialism? Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A.A. (1928) “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal, 38: 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holcombe, R.G. Equilibrium Versus the Invisible Hand. The Review of Austrian Economics 12, 227–243 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007820310502

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007820310502

Keywords

Navigation