Skip to main content
Log in

Embedded Options in the Mortgage Contract

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loss mitigation is the process by which lenders attempt to minimize losses associated with foreclosure. As competition increases in the mortgage industry, lenders and servicers are under great pressure to adopt loss mitigation tactics rather than simply use foreclosure as the means of dealing with borrowers in default. This study presents a mortgage-pricing model that fully specifies all borrower options with respect to default, including the ability to reinstate the mortgage out of default. We document the impact of various loss mitigation programs, including forbearance and antideficiency judgments, as well as the value of credit on borrower default behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose, B. W., and C. A. Capone. (2000). “The Hazard Rates of First and Second Default,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 20(3) 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., and M. Scholes. (1973). “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozza, D. R., D. Kazarian, and T. A. Thomson. (1998). “The Conditional Probability of Mortgage Default,” Real Estate Economics 26(3), 359–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. C., J. E. Ingersoll, Jr., and S. A. Ross. (1985). “An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Model of Asset Prices,” Econometrica 53(2), 363–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D. F., and P. H. Hendershott. (1984), “Pricing FHA Mortgage Default Insurance,” Housing Finance Review 3, 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C., and R. Van Order. (1984). “An Option Based Model of Mortgage Default,” Housing Finance Review 3, 351–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, J., J. B. Kau, and C. Slawson. (1998). “Valuing Prepayment and Default in a Fixed Rate Mortgage: A Bivariate Binomial Pricing Technique,” Real Estate Economics 26(3), 431–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, J. E., A. L. Schwartz, and A. L. Tucker. (1996). “Bivariate Binomial Options Pricing with Generalized Interest Rate Processes,” Journal of Financial Research 19(4), 585–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, J. P., and J. S. Early. (1970). Home Mortgage Delinquency and Foreclosure. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., and D. Kasserman. (1980). “Default Risk on Home Mortgage Loans: A Test of Competing Hypotheses,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 3, 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., and D. C. Keenan. (1995). “An Overview of the Option-Theoretic Pricing of Mortgages,” Journal of Housing Research 6(2), 217–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, and T. Kim. (1993a). “Transaction Costs, Suboptimal Termination, and Default Probabilities,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 21(3), 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, and T. Kim. (1994). “Default Probabilities for Mortgages,” Journal of Urban Economics 35(3), 278–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., and T. Kim. (1994). “Waiting to Default: The Value of Delay,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 22(3), 539–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, W. J. Muller III, and J. F. Epperson. (1992). “A Generalized Valuation Model for Fixed-Rate Residential Mortgages,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 24, 279–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, W. J. Muller III, and J. F. Epperson. (1993b). “Option Theory and Floating-Rate Securities with a Comparison of Adjustable-and Fixed-Rate Mortgages,” Journal of Business 66, 595–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. B., and K. Ramaswamy. (1990). “Simple Binomial Processes as Diffusion Approximations in Financial Models,” Review of Financial Studies 3(3), 393–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quercia, R., and M. A. Stegman. (1992). “Residential Mortgage Default: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Housing 3, 341–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, J. M., and R. Van Order. (1995). “Explicit Tests of Contingent Claims Models of Mortgage Default,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 11(2), 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E. S., and W. N. Torous. (1992). “Prepayment, Default, and the Valuation of Mortgage Pass-Through Securities,” Journal of Business 65(2), 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Furstenberg, G. (1969). “Default Risk on FHA-Insured Home Mortgages as a Function of the Term of Financing: A Quantitative Analysis,” Journal of Finance 24, 459–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Furstenberg, G., and R. J. Green. (1974). “Home Mortgages Delinquency: A Cohort Analysis,” Journal of Finance 29, 1545–1548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. O., W. Beranek, and J. Kenkel. (1974). “Default Risk in Urban Mortgages: A Pittsburgh Prototype Analysis,” AREUEA Journal 2, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ambrose, B.W., Buttimer, R.J. Embedded Options in the Mortgage Contract. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 21, 95–111 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007819408669

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007819408669

Navigation