Abstract
This study looks at three popular works of short fiction, by Leo Tolstoy, Ambrose Bierce, and Katherine Anne Porter, in which the main character dies at the end. Some similarities between these deaths and recent near-death experience (NDE) accounts are that the characters experience various kinds of distancing from their bodies, light and darkness play a role, and two of the stories include a final life review. The principal contrast is that dying in these stories is a lonely and mostly grim business, unsupported by a process that transcends the individual or by progress toward an afterlife or otherworld. The comparison helps define the modern sensibility about dying that is part of the cultural context for interest in NDEs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bierce, A. (1946). The collected writings of Ambrose Bierce. New York, NY: Citadel Press.
Callanan, M., and Kelley, P. (1992). Final gifts: Understanding the special awareness, needs, and communications of the dying. New York, NY: Poseidon Press.
Givner, J. (1982). Katherine Anne Porter: A life. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Morris, R. (1995). Ambrose Bierce: Alone in bad company. New York, NY: Crown.
Osis, K., and Haraldsson, E. (1977). At the hour of death. New York, NY: Avon.
Porter, K. A. (1965). The collected stories of Katherine Anne Porter. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Straight, S. (1984). A wave among waves: Katherine Anne Porter's near-death experience. Anabiosis: The Journal of Near-Death Studies, 4, 107–123.
Tolstoy, L. (1960). The death of Ivan Ilych and other stories. New York, NY: Penguin.
Tolstoy, L. (1978). The portable Tolstoy. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
Zaleski, C. (1987). Otherworld journeys: Accounts of near-death experience in medieval and modern times. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haussamen, B. Three Fictional Deaths Compared with the Near-Death Experience. Journal of Near-Death Studies 19, 91–102 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007809005581
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007809005581