Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding and Removing the Effects of Performance Cues on Behavioral Ratings

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that performance information (e.g., prior supervisor ratings) can bias behavioral ratings. However, research has not fully explored the effects of performance cues on raters' memory. In addition, no studies have attempted to eliminate this performance cue effect. This study addressed these deficiencies by collecting both free recall and recognition memory measures while testing an unstructured free recall intervention. Results indicate that performance cues do affect the recall of performance relevant behaviors from memory. Contrary to expectations, free recall did not prove to be an effective intervention. Implications of these findings for future attempts to remove the performance cue effect are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fix indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNisi, A. S., & Pritchard, R. D. (1978). Implicit theories of performance as artifacts in survey research: A replication and extension. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 358–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 Users' Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. R., Lingle, J. H., & Scerbo, M. (1984). The impact of performance cues on leaderbehavior ratings: The role of selective information availability and probabilistic response bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 323–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., Binning, J. F., Rush, M. C., & Thomas, J. C. (1978). The effects of performance cues and leader behavior ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, R. F., & Guzzo, R. A. (1991). The dynamics of implicit theories of work group performance: When and how do they operate? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, R. F., Guzzo, R. A., & Willis, C. E. (1995). A methodological and substantive note on the "performance-cue effect" in ratings of work group behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, R. F., & Willis, C. E. (1993). Effects of observers' performance expectations on behavior ratings of work groups: Memory or response bias? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae, M. B. (1994). Influence of sex role stereotypes on personnel decisions of black managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 306–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., Garcia, M., Kerkar, S., Martin, C., & Balzer, B. (1982). Relationship between observational accuracy and accuracy in evaluating performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 320–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. R., & Jones, A. (1993). The influences of performance cues and observational focus on performance rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1523–1545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewett-Livingston, A. J., Field, H. S., Veres, J. G., & Lewis, P. M. (1996). Effects of race on interview ratings in a situational panel interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 178–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuessler, K. (1971). Analyzing social data: A statistical orientation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srull, T. K. (1984). Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition. In R. Wyer and T. Srull (eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 1–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1963). Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire-Form XII. Columbus OH: Bureau of Business Research, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. J., & Gardiner, J. M. (1979). An appreciation of generate-recognize theory of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 687–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woehr, D. J., & Feldman, J. (1993). Processing objective and question order effects on the causal relation between memory and judgment in performance appraisal: Tip of the iceberg. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 232–241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baltes, B.B., Parker, C.P. Understanding and Removing the Effects of Performance Cues on Behavioral Ratings. Journal of Business and Psychology 15, 229–246 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007787010800

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007787010800

Keywords

Navigation