Skip to main content
Log in

Mortality Risk Perceptions: A Bayesian Reassessment

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses a Bayesian learning model to assess the respective influence of different risk measurements on mortality risk perceptions. People form risk beliefs using several sources of information, including the actual population mean death risk level, the discounted lost life expectancy, and the age-specific hazard rate considered by Benjamin and Dougan (1997). The appropriate criterion for judging the validity of risk perceptions is not the perfect information case, but rather whether people form their risk beliefs in a rational manner given a world of costly and limited risk information. Although the statistical results support the overall conclusion that the learning process is rational, the character of the learning process differs depending on the risk level. Risk-related variables are much better predictors of larger risks than of small risks, which reflects the role of information costs and the benefits of learning about larger risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benjamin, Daniel K. and William R. Dougan. (1997). “Individuals' Estimates of the Risks of Death: Part I—A Reassessment of the Previous Evidence” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Sarah, Paul Slovic, Baruch Fischhoff, Mark Layman, and Barbara Combs. (1978). “Judged Frequency of Events,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4:6, 551–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. Granger (instructor), Engineering and Public Policy/Carnegie-Mellon University Graduate Research Methods Class. (1983). “On Judging the Frequency of Lethal Events: A Replication,” Risk Analysis 3:1, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (1994). Vital Statistics of the United States, 1990, Vol. II, Mortality, Part A. Washington: Public Health Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Safety Council. (1993). Accident Facts. Washington: National Safety Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip. (1992). Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for Risk. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip. (1993). “The Value of Risks of Life and Health,” Journal of Economic Literature 31:4, 1912–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, Jahn K. Hakes and Alan Carlin. (1997). “Measures of Mortality Risks,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14:3.

  • Viscusi, W. Kip and Michael J. Moore. (1989). “Rates of Time Preference and Valuations of the Duration of Life,” Journal of Public Economics 38, 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hakes, J., Viscusi, W.K. Mortality Risk Perceptions: A Bayesian Reassessment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15, 135–150 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007782217912

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007782217912

Navigation