Skip to main content
Log in

Hölder Distance Function and Measurement of Technical Efficiency

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we intend to establish relations between the way efficiency is measured in the literature on efficiency analysis, and the notion of distance in topology. In particular we study the Holder norms and their relationship to the shortage function (Luenberger (1995) and the directional distance function (Chambers, Chung and Färe (1995–96)). Along this line, we provide mathematical programs to compute the Holder distance function. However, this has a perverse property that undermines its attractiveness: it fails the commensurability condition suggested by Russell (1988). Thus, we introduce a commensurable Holder distance function invariant with respect to a change in the units of measurement. Among other things we obtain some continuity result and we prove that the well known Debreu-Farrell measure is a special case of the Holder distance function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afriat, S. (1972). “Efficiency Estimation of Production Function.” International Economic Review 13, 568–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. (1984). “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science 30, 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., and Morey. (1986). “Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs.” Operation Research 34, 513–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briec, W. (1995). Une nouvelle approche de la mesure de l'efficacité productive, PH.D dissertation, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales–GREQAM.

  • Briec, W. (1997). “A Graph Type Extension of Farrell Technical Efficiency Measure.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 8, 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briec, W. (1997). “Minimum Distance to the Complement of a Convex Set: Duality Result.” Journal of Optimisation Theory and Application 95, 301–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., Y. Chung, and R. Färe. (1995). “Benefit and Distance Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 70, 407–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., Y. Chung, and R. Fére. (1996). “Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, forthcoming.

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 3, 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1951). “The Coefficient of Resource Utilization.” Econometrica 19, 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichorn, W., and J. Voeller. (1976). Theory of Price Index: Fisher's Test Approach and Generalizations (Lecture Notes in Operations Research and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 140). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., and C. A. K. Lovell. (1978). “Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Production.” Journal of Economic Theory 19, 150–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fére, R., and S. Grosskopf. (1983). “Measuring Congestion in Production.” Zeitschrift für Nationalkönomie 43, 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. A. K. Lovell. (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Kluwer Nijhof Publishing.

  • Füre, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. A. K. Lovell. (1994). Production Frontier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120, 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, S. (1986). “The Role of the Reference Technology in Measuring Productive Efficiency.” The Economic Journal 96, 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1951). “Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities.” In T. C. Koopmans (ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation.

  • Luenberger, D. G. (1968). Optimization by Vector Space. Wiley and Sons.

  • Luenberger, D. G. (1992). “Benefit Function and Duality.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 21, 461–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D. G. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press.

  • Russell, R. R. (1985). “Measures of Technical Efficiency.” Journal of Economic Theory 35, 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. R. (1988). “On the Axiomatic Approach to the Measurement of Technical Efficiency.” In Measurement in Economics, Physica-Verlag Heidelberg.

  • Russell, R. R. (1990). “Continuity of Measures of Technical Efficiency.” Journal of Economic Theory 51, 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, R. (1986). “Constructing Higher-Dimensional Convex Hulls at Logarithmic Cost Per Face.” In Proc. 18th Annu. ACM Sympos. Theor. Comput., 404–413.

  • Seiford, L. M. (1989). “A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978–1989)--DEA Bibliography 5.0.” University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA: Dept. Industrial Engineering and Operations Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M. (1990). “Recent Development in DEA: The Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens, H., and P. Vanden Eeckaut. (1995). “Non-Parametric Efficiency Progress and Regress-Measures for Panel Data: Methodological Aspects.” European Journal of Operational Research 80, 474–499.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briec, W. Hölder Distance Function and Measurement of Technical Efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis 11, 111–131 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007764912174

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007764912174

Navigation