Skip to main content
Log in

The Meaning of Size: Output? Scope? Capacity? The Case of Airline Hubs

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The “size” of a production facility has different specific meanings depending on the nature of the business decision at issue. We present a general theoretical model illustrating the profit-maximizing firm's interrelated choice of plant size in long-run, medium-run and short-run contexts. The model is then estimated for U.S. airline hubs. The results suggest that competition operates primarily via the capacity (long-run) size decision. A game-theoretic simulation based upon the results is consistent with the argument that the smaller of two hubs sharing an airport is at a significant competitive disadvantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, Elizabeth E., and John C. Panzar (1981) ‘The Contestability of Airline Markets During the Transition to Deregulation’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 44, 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Paul W. (1987) ‘Airline Hubs: A Study of Determining Factors and Effects’, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Review, 4, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, Severin (1989) ‘Hubs and High Fares: Airport Dominance and Market Power in the U.S. Airline Industry’, Rand Journal of Economics, 20, 344–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, Severin (1992) ‘The Evolution of U.S. Airline Competition’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 45–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, Jan K., and Pablo T. Spiller (1994) ‘Economies of Traffic Density in the Deregulated Airline Industry’, Journal of Law and Economics, 37, 379–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Richard V., and John H. Huston (1989a) ‘Merger Mania and Airline Fares’, Eastern Economic Journal, 15, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Richard V., and John H. Huston (1989b) ‘How Contestable are Airline Markets?’, Atlantic Economic Journal, 17, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Richard V., and John H. Huston (1990) ‘Airline Service to NonHub Airports Ten Years after Deregulation’, The Logistics and Transportation Review, 26, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, Kenneth J. (1996) ‘Aviation Deregulation in the European Union: Do Actors Learn in the Regulation Game?’, Contemporary Economic Policy, 14, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, William N., and Ioannis Kessides (1993), ‘Localized Market Power in the U.S. Airline Industry’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, John H., and Richard V. Butler (1988) ‘The Effect of “Fortress Hubs” on Airline Fares and Service: The Early Returns’, The Logistics and Transportation Review, 24, 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, John H., and Richard V. Butler (1991) ‘The Location of Airline Hubs’, Southern Economic Journal, 57, 975–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, John H., and Richard V. Butler (1993) ‘Airline Hubs in the Single European Market: A Benchmark Analysis’, Review of Industrial Organization, 8, 407–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Alfred E. (1988) ‘I Would Do It Again’, Regulation, 2, 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Steven A., and Clifford Winston (1986) The Economic Effects of Airline Deregulation. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butler, R.V., Huston, J.H. The Meaning of Size: Output? Scope? Capacity? The Case of Airline Hubs. Review of Industrial Organization 14, 51–64 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007764008391

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007764008391

Keywords

Navigation