Skip to main content
Log in

The environmental and ethical implications of lead shot contamination of rural lands in North America

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lead shot deposited in fields and woodlands near shooting rangesand intense, upland, hunting adds an enormous tonnage of lead toenvironments, worldwide. This contamination is not remedied bybanning lead shot use only for waterfowl hunting. Lead pelletsdisintegrate extremely slowly, during which time they may beingested from the soil by wild birds, livestock, or silage-makingmachinery, and cause sublethal or fatal lead poisoning. Leadpellet corrosion products contaminate soil, surface waters, andground waters, often exceeding permissible levels. Plants do notconcentrate much lead from the soil, except when grown in acidicsoils of heavily-contaminated shooting ranges. Inheavily-contaminated sites, earthworms ingest leadcompounds which are bioaccumulated in higher consumersof food webs. Non-toxic substitutes made from steelor bismuth are available internationally and areeffective for all types of hunting and targetshooting. Many nations are slow to require their use,despite the marked awareness of the problems of leadshot contamination and toxicosis. This is due tohunters and international sport shooting organizationsopposing the use of non-toxic substitutes and overtemphasis by government agencies on the burden ofscientific proof for every situation, rather thantaking preventative action according to thePrecautionary Principle. The ethical approach ofDenmark and The Netherlands, which banned all uses oflead shot, is advocated as a precedent for othernations to adopt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adriano, D.C., Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment(New York, N.Y.: Springer-Verlag, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W.L., "Legislation and Lawsuits in the United States and Their Effects on Nontoxic Shot Requirements," in D.J. Pain (ed.) Lead Poisoning in Waterfowl(Slimbridge, U.K.: International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, "Steel OK for Clays," Shooting Times and Country Magazine5 (1995), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, T.L., T.E. Garrison, and C.G. Schmitt, "Availability and Ingestion of Lead Shot by Mourning Doves (Zenaida macroura) in Southeastern New Mexico," Southwest Naturalist 37 (1992), 287–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, N.J., and V.G. Thomas, "The Solubility of Metallic Lead in Natural Waters and its Contribution to Pollution," Grucible27 (1995), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, A.C., "Fallout of Lead and Uptake by Crops," Atmospheric Environment17 (1983), 693–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B.E., and I. Thornton, Pathways of Lead into Food(London, U.K.: International Lead-Zinc Research Organization, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R., Contamination of Soil fromGun Shot: St. Thomas Gun Club (1993), Standards Development Branch, Phytotoxicology Section (Brampton, ONT.: Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada, PollutionPrevention: Towards aFederal Strategy forAction(Ottawa, ONT.: Department of the Environment, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, D., and J. van Vessem, Lead Poisoning in Waterfowl: International Update Report 1995(Slimbridge, U.K.: International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feierabend, J.S., Steel Shot and Lead Poisoning inWaterfowl. An Annotated Bibliography of Research 1976–1983. Science and Technology Series No. 8 (Washington, D.C.: National Wildlife Federation, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frape, D.L., and J.D. Pringle, "Toxic Manifestations in a Dairy Herd Consuming Haylage Contaminated by Lead," Veterinary Record114 (1984), 615–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada, It’s About Our Health: Towards Pollution Prevention, Report of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development (Ottawa, ONT.: Publishing, Public Works and Government Services, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregson, S.K., and B.J. Alloway, "Gel Permeation Chromatography Studies on the Speciation of Lead in Solutions of Heavily Polluted Soils," Journal of Soil Science35 (1984), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, G.B., "Lead Poisoning," Forest and Stream42 (1894), 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, G, "Lead-Shot Ban forWaterfowlers by 1997," Ontario Out of Doors, September Issue(1995), 43–44.

  • Howard, R.H., and R.A. Braum, "Lead Poisoning in a Dairy Herd," American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, 23rd Annual Proceedings(1980), 53–58.

  • Jaworski, J.F., Effects of Lead in the Environment. Quantitative Aspects.NRCC NO. 16763 (Ottawa, ONT.: National Research Council of Canada, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L.H.P., and C.R. Clement, "Lead Uptake by Plants and its Significance for Animals," in P. Hepple (ed.) Lead and the Environment(London, U.K.: Institute of Petroleum, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, S.S., and M. Willems, "The Fate of Lead in Soils: The Transformation of Lead Pellets in Shooting-Range Soils," Ambio16 (1987), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, R.J., T.E. Lacker, Jr., C. Bunck, B. Daniel, C. Driver, C.E. Grue, F. Leighton, W. Stansley, P.G. Watanabe, and M. Whitworth, "An Ecological Assessment of Lead Shot Exposure in Non-Waterfowl Avian Species: Upland Game Birds and Raptors," Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry15 (1996), 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, L.N., and M. Friend, "Lead Poisoning of Avian Species Other ThanWaterfowl," in D.J. Pain (ed.) Lead Poisoning in Waterfowl(Slimbridge, U.K.: International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W.C., "The Influence of Soil Properties and Worm-Related Factors on the Concentration of Heavy Metals in Earthworms," Pedobiologia24 (1982), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W.C., "Heavy Metal Accumulation in the Mole, Talpa europea, and Earthworms as an Indicator of Metal Bioavailability inTerrestrial Environments," Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology39 (1987), 933–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W.C., "Effect of Soil Pollution with Metallic Lead Pellets on Lead Bioaccumulation and Organ/Body Weight Alterations in Small Mammals," Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology18 (1989), 617–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manninen, S., and N. Tanskanen, "Transfer of Lead from Shotgun Pellets to Humus and Three Plant Species in a Finnish Shooting Range," Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology24 (1993), 410–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, M.R., and V.G. Thomas, "Economic Analyses of Crippling Losses of North AmericanWaterfowl and Their Policy Implications forManagement," Environmental Conservation 21 (1994), 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nriagu, J.O., "Lead in Soils, Sediments, and Major Rock Groups," in J.O. Nriagu (ed.) Biogeochemistry of Lead in the Environment: Part A, Ecological Cycles(New York, N.Y.: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nriagu, J.O., and J. Pacyna, "Quantitative Assessment of Worldwide Contamination of Air, Water and Soils by Trace Metals," Nature333 (1988), 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Risk Reduction Monograph No. 1: Lead. Environment Directorate. Paris (France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy, Rationale for the Development of Soil, Drinking Water, and Air Quality Criteria for Lead. Hazardous Contaminants Branch (Toronto, ONT.: Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, D.J., "Lead poisoning of waterfowl," in D.J. Pain (ed.) Lead Poisoning in Waterfowl(Slimbridge, U.K.: International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, D.J., "Lead in the environment," in D.J. Hoffman, B.A. Rattner, G.A. Burton, Jr., and J. Cairns, Jr. (eds.) Handbook of Ecotoxicology(Boca Raton, FL.: Lewis Publishers, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain,.J., C. Amiard-Triquet, C. Bavoux, G. Burneleau, L. Eon, and P. Nicolau-Guillaumet, "Lead Poisoning in Wild Marsh Harriers (Circus aeruginosus) in the Camargue and Charente-Maritime," France. Ibis135 (1993), 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.C., and F.C. Lincoln, American Waterfowl(New York, N.Y.: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D.A., M.F. McLoughlin, W.J. Blanchflowers, and T.R. Thompson, "Chronic Lead Poisoning in Steers Eating Silage Contaminated with Lead Shot–Diagnostic Criteria," Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology39 (1987), 622–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, D.E., L. Widjeskog, and W. Stansley, "Lead Poisoning of Northern Pintail Ducks Feeding in a Tidal Meadow Contaminated with Shot from a Trap and Skeet Range," Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology42 (1989), 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuhammer, A.M., and S.L. Norris, A Review of the Environmental Impacts of Lead Shotshell Ammunition and Lead Fishing Weights in Canada. Occasional Paper No. 88. Canadian Wildlife Service (Ottawa, ONT.: Environment Canada, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedden, C.B., "The BritishHunter’s Perspective on Lead and Steel Shot," in D.J. Pain (ed.) Lead Poisoning in Waterfowl(Slimbridge, U.K.: International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V.G., "Lead Shot in the Environment: Its Role in Toxicosis and Remediation of the Problem. Issues Paper No. 5. Session A, Shot and Sinkers," Report of the OECD Workshop on Lead Products. Environment Directorate (Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V.G., "Why the U.S. and Canada Aren’t Adopting Non-Toxic Shot and Fishing Sinkers," International Journal of Environmental Affairs7 (1995), 364–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V.G., "Attitudes and Issues Preventing Bans on Toxic Lead Shot and Sinkers in North America and Europe," Environmental Values6 (1997), 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V.G., and M. Owen, "Transition Towards Use of Non-Toxic Shot in the United Kingdom," Wildfowl46 (1995), 157–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V.G., and M. Owen, "Preventing Lead Toxicosis of European Waterfowl by Regulatory and Non-Regulatory Means," Environmental Conservation23 (1996), 358–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V.G., and M.A. Pokras, "International Analysis of Non-Toxic Shot Adoption for Waterfowling," in I.D. Thompson (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st International Union of Game Biologists Congress Vol. 2(Chalk River, ONT.: Canadian Forest Service, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, I., and P. Abrahams, "Role of Soil Ingestion in the Intake of Metals by Livestock," Trace Substances in Environmental Health15 (1981), 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, "The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development," in Earth Summit ’92. The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development(London, U.K.: The Regency Press Corporation, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Final Supplemental Impact Statement on the Use of Lead Shot for Hunting Migratory Birds(Washington, D.C.: Department of the Interior, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyndham, M., and K.M. Dickson (Editors), Migratory Game Birds in Canada: Proposals for 1996 Hunting Regulations–December, 1995. Canadian Wildlife Service (Ottawa, ONT.: Environment Canada, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, V. The environmental and ethical implications of lead shot contamination of rural lands in North America. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10, 41–54 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007757607468

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007757607468

Navigation