Abstract
Using cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiography, we investigated the effects of candesartan cilexetil, a specific angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, on left ventricular (LV) mass and hemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension. Ten patients (four men and six women) with essential hypertension received candesartan cilexetil 2–8 mg/day orally for 8–12 weeks. After drug administration, systolic blood pressure (BP) decreased from 178.9 ± 17.2 mmHg (mean ± SD) to 150.2 ± 14.3 mmHg (P < 0.0001) and diastolic BP from 101.4 ± 6.5 mmHg to 87.8 ± 11.9 mmHg (P = 0.0021). Both MRI and echocardiography revealed a significant decrease in LV mass index (LVMI) after candesartan cilexetil. MRI indicated that LVMI decreased from 111.3 ± 31.3 g/m2 to 102.6 ± 32.1 g/m2 (P = 0.0484) and echocardiography that LVMI decreased from 123.9 ± 31.1 g/m2 to 115.8 ± 31.4 g/m2 (P = 0.0316). Total systemic vascular resistance decreased significantly during treatment with candesartan cilexetil in both MRI and echocardiography assessment, from 1847.2 ± 636.3 dynes·s·cm−5 to 1540.4 ± 432.0 dynes·s·cm−5 (P = 0.0034) on MRI and from 1820.4 ± 318.8 dynes·s·cm−5 to 1659.0 ± 317.7 dynes·s·cm−5 (P = 0.0060) on echocardiography. These findings suggest that candesartan cilexetil 2–8 mg/day orally for 8–12 weeks is beneficial in the regression of cardiac hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kannel WB, Doyle JT, McNamara PM, et al. Precursors of sudden coronary death. Factors related to the incidence of sudden death. Circulation 1975;51:606-613.
McLenachan JM, Henderson E, Morris KI, Dargie HJ. Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. N Engl J Med 1987;317:787-792.
Dunn FG, Plingle SD. Left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial ischemia in systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:19I-22I.
Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham heart study. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1561-1566.
Kannel WB, Castelli WP, McNamara PM, et al. Role of blood pressure in the development of congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1972;287:781-787.
Dahlöf B: The importance of the renin-angiotensin system in reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy. J Hypertens 1993;11(Suppl. 3):S29-S35.
Morgan HE, Baker KM. Cardiac hypertrophy. Mechanical, neural, and endocrine dependence. Circulation 1991; 83:13-25.
Himmelmann A, Svensson A, Bergbrant A, Hansson L. Long-term effects of losartan on blood pressure and left ventricular structure in essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 1996;10:729-734.
Cheung B. Increased left-ventricular mass after losartan treatment. Lancet 1997;349:1743-1744.
Shibouta Y, Inada Y, Ojima M, et al. Pharmacological profile of a highly potent and long-acting angiotensin II receptor antagonist, 2-ethoxy-1-[[2′-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl] methyl]-1H-benzimidazole-7-carboxylic acid (CV-11974), and its prodrug, (±)-1-(cyclohexyloxycarbonyloxy)-ethyl 2-ethoxy-1-[[2′-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl]methyl]-1H-benzimidazole-7-carboxylate (TCV-116). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1993;266:114-120.
Yamaoka O, Yabe T, Okada M, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular mass: Comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and contrast left ventriculography. Am Heart J 1993;126:1372-1379.
Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, et al. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978;58:1072-1083.
Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: Echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 1976;37:7-11.
Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57: 450-458.
Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Kannel WB, et al. The spectrum of left ventricular hypertrophy in a general population sample: The Framingham Study. Circulation 1987;75(Suppl. I):I26-I33.
Tsunoda K, Abe K, Hagino T, et al. Hypotensive effect of losartan, a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1993;6:28-32.
Ogihara T, Higashimori K, Masuo K, Mikami H. Pilot study of a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, TCV-116: Effects of a single oral dose on blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Ther 1993;15:684-691.
Dahlöf B, Pennert K, Hansson L. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. A meta-analysis of 109 treatment studies. Am J Hypertens 1992;5:95-110.
Gottdiener JS, Reda DJ, Massie BM, et al. Effect of single-drug therapy on reduction of left ventricular mass in mild to moderate hypertension. Comparison of six antihypertensive agents. Circulation 1997;95:2007-2014.
Neaton JD, Grimm RH Jr., Prineas RJ, et al. Treatment of mild hypertension study. Final results. JAMA 1993; 270:713-724.
Savage DD, Drayer JIM, Henry WL, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac anatomy and function in hypertensive subjects. Circulation 1979;59:623-632.
Katz J, Milliken MC, Stray-Gundersen J, et al. Estimation of human myocardial mass with MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 169:495-498.
Germain P, Roul G, Kastler B, et al. Inter-study variability in left ventricular mass measurement. Comparison between M-mode echography and MRI. Eur Heart J 1992;13: 1011-1019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitsunami, K., Inoue, S., Maeda, K. et al. Three-Month Effects of Candesartan Cilexetil, an Angiotensin II Type 1 (AT1) Receptor Antagonist, on Left Ventricular Mass and Hemodynamics in Patients with Essential Hypertension. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 12, 469–474 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007754100351
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007754100351