Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Buyer Market Power and Innovative Activities

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This empirical paper deals with the effects of supplier and buyer market concentration on the innovative behavior of suppliers within the German automobile industry. The data set contains firms from all size classes and covers measures of innovation input as well as innovation output. It can be shown that (a) firms' innovation and R & D-employment intensity will decline (increase) in buyer concentrations if supplier markets are low (high) concentrated; (b) buyers' pressure on input prices reduces suppliers' innovation expenditures and their incentive to develop new products; (c) a small number of competitors in suppliers markets and a large stock of customers stimulates innovative behavior; (d) small and medium sized suppliers invest more in their innovative activities but have less probability of realizing innovations than larger firms; and (e) higher technological capabilities lead to higher innovation input and output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J., and D. B. Audretsch (1990) Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1985)Advanced Econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, S., and H. Hollenstein (1994) 'Demand and Supply Factors in Explaining the Innovative Activity of Swiss Manufacturing Firms', Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, S., and H. Hollenstein (1996) 'Industrial Innovation in Switzerland: A Model-Based Analysis with Survey Data', in A. Kleinknecht, ed., Determinants of Innovation: The Message from New Indicators. London: Macmillan Press, pp. 13–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W., and J. Peters (1997a) 'Vertical Corporate Networks in the German Automobile Industry: Efficiency and Intra-Group R&D-Spillovers', International Studies of Management and Organization, 27(4), 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W., and J. Peters (1997b) 'University R&D-Spillovers and Innovation Activity – Evidence for the GermanManufacturing Industry', Paper Presented at The Annual Conference of the European Association of Evolutionary Political Economy, November 1997, Athens.

  • Brouwer E., and A. Kleinknecht (1996) 'Measuring the Unmeasurable: A Country's non R&DExpenditure on Product and Service Innovation', Research Policy, 25, 1235–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., and J. L. Bower (1996) 'Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms', Strategic Management Journal, 17, 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B., and T. Fujimoto (1991) Product Development Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. (1995) 'Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity', in Paul Stoneman, ed., Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., pp. 182–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., R. C. Levin, and D. C. Mowery (1987) 'Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Re-Examination', The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 543–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A. (1989) The Japanese Automobile Industry. London: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1969) 'Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint', Journal of Law and Economics, 12, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. (1996) 'Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry', Strategic Management Journal, 17, 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebers, M., and C. Jarillo (1997) 'Preface: The Construction, Forms, and Consequences of Industry Networks', International Studies of Management & Organization, 27, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, S. (1981) 'Buyer Market Structure and R&D Effort: A Simultaneous Equations Model', Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, 336–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, J., G. Licht, E. Nerlinger, and G. Stahl (1996) 'Appropriability, Opportunity, Firm Size and Innovation Activites', in A. Kleinknecht, ed., Determinants of Innovation: The Message from New Indicators. London: Macmillan Press, pp. 125–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1991) 'Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues', Research Policy, 20, 499–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, A. J. (1993) Unternehmensgröße und Innovation, [Firm Size and Innovation]. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1956) American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power, Revised Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A. (1990) 'Innovation, Technological Opportunity, and Market Structure', Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 586–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A. (1992) 'Vertical Relations Between Firms and Industrial Policy', The Economic Journal, 102, 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. J., and D. M. G. Newberry (1982) 'Preemptive Patenting and Persistence of Monopoly', American Economic Review, 72, 514–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, S., and G. Potkowik (1990) Patente und Wirtschaftszweige: Zusammenfùhrung der Internationalen Patentklassifikation und der Systematik der Wirtschaftszweige, [Patents and Industries: Unification of the International Patent Classification and the Systematics of Industries].Köln: Carl Heymanns Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D. (1996) 'Strategic Spillovers and Incentives for Research and Development', Management Science, 42, 907–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. C. (1995) Strategic Networks: Creating the Borderless Organization. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. I. (1992) 'Patent Licensing', in: R. J. Aumann and S. Hart, eds, Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers/North Holland, pp. 331–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. I., and N. L. Schwartz (1982) Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., R. Crawford, and A. Alchain (1978) 'Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process', Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 297–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A., and D. Bain (eds) (1993) New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S. (1996) 'Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle', American Economic Review, 86, 562–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klevorick, A. K., R. C. Levin, R. R. Nelson, and S. G. Winter (1995) 'On the Sources and Significance of Inter-Industry Differences in Technological Opportunity', Research Policy, 24, 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, H., and G. Licht (1995) 'Patents, R&D and Innovation: Evidence from the Mannheim Innovation Panel', ifo-Studien, 33, 521–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1969) 'Organizational or Frictional Equilibria, X-Efficiency and the Rate of Innovation', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83, 600–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. C. (1988) 'Appropriability, R&D-Spending, and Technological Performance', AEA Papers and Proceedings, 78, 424–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. C., W. M. Cohen, and D. C. Mowery (1985) 'R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses', AEA Papers and Proceedings, 75, 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K., R. R. Kamath, S. N. Wasti, and M. Nagamachi (1996) 'Supplier Involvement in Automotive Component Design: Are there Really Large US Japan Differences?', Research Policy, 25, 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustgarten, S. H. (1975) 'The Impact of Buyer Structure in Manufacturing Industries', Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. (1990) 'Managing Suppliers: Incentive Systems in Japanese and US Industry', California Management Review, 32, 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, H.-R., K. P. Kisker, U. Bochum, and J. Assmann (1994) Die Teile und die Herrschaft: die Reorganisation der Automobilproduktion und der Zulieferbeziehungen, [Parts and Power – The Reorganisation of Automobile Production and of Supply Relationships]. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendius, H. G. (1991) Zulieferer im Netz – Zwischen Abhängigkeit und Partnerschaft, [Supplier in Networks – Between Dependence and Partnership]. Köln: Bund-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer, F., and H. Wessels (1989) 'Intersektorale Verflechtung von Technologiegebern und Technologienehmern – Eine empirische Analyse für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, [Intersectoral Interweaving of Technology Givers and Technology Takers – An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Republic of Germany]', Jahrbuch für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 206, 563–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, B., B. Riess, and G. Theis (1989) Der Lieferant On Line, [The Supplier On Line]. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1959) 'The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research', Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1983) Nachfragemacht – Die Ausübung von Marktmacht durch marktstarke Nachfrager, [Demand Power – The Exercise of Market Power by Strong Buyers], FIW-Dokumentation, 4, Carl Heymann Verlag.

  • OECD (1993) Proposed Standard Practice For Surveys of Research and Experimental Development – Frascati Manual. Paris: OECD-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. (1996) 'Messung und Bewertung des Innovationsverhalten im deutschen Automobilzuliefersektor – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung, [Measurement and Evaluation of Innovative Behavior within the German Automobile Supply Industry – Evidence of an Empirical Study]', Working Paper Series of the Department of Economics, 151, University of Augsburg.

  • Reinganum, J. F. (1989) 'The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion', in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, eds, Handbook of Industrial Organization, I. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 849–908.

  • Riordan, M. H., and D. E. Sappington (1989) 'Second Sourcing', RAND Journal of Economics, 20, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P. L., and R. N. Langlois (1995) 'Innovation, Networks, and Vertical Integration', Research Policy, 24, 543–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966) Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1948) Capitalismus, Socialism and Democracy, Bern Scientific Consulting (1995) Restrukturierungstrends in der deutschen Automobilzulieferindustrie im internationalen Vergleich, [International Comparison of Trends in Restructuring in the German Automobile Supply Industry], Expert Opinion for the Federal Ministry of Economics, Köln.

  • Shapiro, C. (1985) 'Patent Licensing and R&D Rivalry',American Economic Review, 75, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smitka, M (1991) Competitive Ties: Subcontracting in the Japanese Automotive Industry. NewYork: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldatos, G. T. (1994) 'Buyer Power in Bilateral Duopoly Model', Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsund Sozialwissenschaften, 114, 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M., and W. J. Abernathy (1975) A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation, OMEGA, 6, 639–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1989) 'Transaction Cost Economics', in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, eds, Handbook of Industrial Organization, I. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers North-Holland, pp. 136–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., D. T. Jones, and D. Roos (1990) The Machine that Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsche Bahn AG, Corporate Development: Transport and Economics, Holzmarktstr. 17, D-10179, Berlin, Germany

    Jürgen Peters

Authors
  1. Jürgen Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peters, J. Buyer Market Power and Innovative Activities. Review of Industrial Organization 16, 13–38 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007731916317

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007731916317

Search

Navigation